Volume 11, Issue 8 pp. 713-719
Original Article

RDP58 is a novel and potentially effective oral therapy for ulcerative colitis

Simon Travis FRCP

Corresponding Author

Simon Travis FRCP

Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this author
Lee Min Yap FRACP

Lee Min Yap FRACP

Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Hawkey DM

Chris Hawkey DM

Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Bryan Warren FRCPath

Bryan Warren FRCPath

Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Mirella Lazarov PhD

Mirella Lazarov PhD

Serbia, Bulgaria, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
Tim Fong PhD

Tim Fong PhD

SangStat Medical Corporation, Fremont, California

Search for more papers by this author
R J Tesi MD

R J Tesi MD

SangStat Medical Corporation, Fremont, California

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 December 2006
Citations: 16

Abstract

Background: RDP58 is a novel anti-inflammatory d-amino acid decapeptide that inhibits synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines by disrupting cell signaling at the pre-MAPK MyD88-IRAK-TRAF6 protein complex. We therefore evaluated its efficacy and safety in parallel multicenter, double-blind, randomized concept studies in ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods: In the first trial, 34 patients with mild to moderate active UC were randomized (1:2) to placebo (n = 13) or RDP58 100 mg (n = 21). In the second trial, 93 similar patients were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo (n = 30) RDP58 200 mg (n = 31), or RDP 300 mg (n = 32). In both studies, treatment success was defined as a simple clinical colitis activity index score of no more than 3 at 28 days. Sigmoidoscopy and rectal biopsy (at baseline and 28 days) and safety measures (baseline and 28 and 56 days) were other endpoints.

Results: Treatment success on RDP 100 mg was 29% versus 46% on placebo (P = 0.46). There were no significant differences in sigmoidoscopy or histology score. In the second study, treatment success on the higher doses of RDP58 (200 and 300 mg) was 71% and 72%, respectively, versus 43% on placebo (P = 0.016). Improvements in sigmoidoscopy scores (41% on 200 mg and 46% on 300 mg versus 32% on placebo) did not reach significance, but histology scores improved significantly (P = 0.002) versus placebo. Overall, adverse events were no different between placebo (3.3 ± 2.4) and RDP58 (2.7 ± 1.4, 300-mg group).

Conclusions: RDP58 at a dose of 200 or 300 mg, but not 100 mg, was effective in mild-to-moderate UC. RDP58 was safe and well tolerated, and its novel action makes it an attractive potential therapy.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.