Article
Hypothesis: Research in Otolaryngology Is Essential for Continued Improvement in Health Care†
Robert H. Mathog MD,
Corresponding Author
Robert H. Mathog MD
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.
Robert H. Mathog, MD, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 4201 St. Antoine, 5E-UHC, Detroit, MI 48201, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorRobert H. Mathog MD,
Corresponding Author
Robert H. Mathog MD
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.
Robert H. Mathog, MD, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 4201 St. Antoine, 5E-UHC, Detroit, MI 48201, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author†
Presented as Guest of Honor Lecture at the Meeting of the Middle Section of the Triological Society, Oklahoma City, OK, January 20, 2002.
Abstract
The present report, in the form of a research proposal, is based on the hypothesis that research in otolaryngology is essential for continued improvement in health care. Examples of advances in otolaryngology as a result of research are noted, but for continued success, otolaryngology must maintain and find better ways to train clinically directed researchers. Traditional methods of training such as hands-on experience, courses in the basic principles of research, protected time, and mentoring are discussed and evaluated. Barriers to success such as age, time, and debt are noted. Potential solutions are presented with an emphasis on integration of the research and clinical training. Success of faculty will continue to depend on laboratory and financial support, technical assistance, protected time, salary equivalent to other faculty, and accessibility of research funds. For research to gain support and enthusiasm and to keep it strong and productive, cost-effectiveness and value must be recognized.
References
- 1 Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Blumenthal D. Relationship between market competition and the activities and attitudes of medical school faculty. JAMA 1997; 278: 222–226.
- 2 Weissman JS, Saglam D, Campbell EG, Causino N, Blumenthal D. Market forces and unsponsored research in academic health centers. JAMA 1999; 281: 1093–1098.
- 3 Moy E, Mazzaschi AJ, Levin RJ, Blake DA, Griner PF. Relationship between National Institutes of Health research awards to U.S. medical schools and managed care penetration. JAMA 1997; 278: 217–221.
- 4 Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Moy E, Blumenhai D. Status of clinical research in academic health centers: views from the research leadership. JAMA 2001; 286: 800–806.
- 5 Association of American Medical Colleges. Breaking the Scientific Bottlenecks, Clinical Research: A National Call to Action. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2000. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/news-room/clinrs/start.htm. Accessed July 2, 2001.
- 6 Wyngaarden JB. The clinical investigator as an endangered species. N Engl J Med 1979; 301: 1254–1259.
- 7 Naclerio RM, Saengpanich S, Spainhour M, Baroody FM. The otolaryngology research paradox. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127: 1181–1184.
- 8 Presented as a report from the Committee on Resident Education at the Annual Meeting of the Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head Neck Surgeons, Oakbrook, IL, November 14, 1992.
- 9 Gates GA. First National Conference on Research Goals and Methods in Otolaryngology: recommendations of the writing groups. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1982; 100: 1–24.
- 10 Bordley JE. History of research training. Arch Otolaryngol 1982; 108: 612–615.
- 11 Mathog RH. Presented as a report from the Committee on Resident Education. Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons, Boston, MA, 1994.
- 12 Nadol JB. Training the physician-scholar in otolaryngology- head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121: 214–219.
- 13 Shambaugh GE. Surgery of the Ear. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1967: 369–400, 447–473, 475–499.
- 14 Wever EG, Lawrence M. Physiological Acoustics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959.
- 15 Davis H, Derbyshire AJ, Lurie MH, Saul LJ. Electrical response of the cochlea. Am J Physiol 1934; 107: 311–332.
- 16 von Békésy G, Rosenblith WA. The mechanical properties of the ear. In: SS Stevens, ed. Handbook of Experimental Physiology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1951.
- 17 House WF, Berliner KI, Eisenberg LS. Present stature and future directions of the Ear Research Institute cochlear implant program. Acta Otolaryngol 1979; 87: 176–184.
- 18 Shea JJ Jr. Fenestration of the oval window. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1958; 67: 932.
- 19 Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand P, de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 1985; 227: 194–196.
- 20 Kelsell DP, Dunlop J, Stevens HP, et al. Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature 1997; 387: 80–83.
- 21 Brunger JW, Mathews AL, Smith RHJ, Robin N. Genetic testing and genetic counseling for deafness: the future is here. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 715–718.
- 22 Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri S, et al. Chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: Phase III Randomized Intergroup Study 0099. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 1310–1317.
- 23 Calais G, Alfonsi M, Bardet E, et al. Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma. JNatl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 2081–2086.
- 24 Wolf GT, Hong WK, Fisher SG, et al. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer: the Department of Veteran's Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group. NEnglJMed 1991; 324: 1685–1690.
- 25 Lefabvre JL, Chevalier D, Luboinski B, Kirkpatrick A, Collette L, Sahmoud T. Larynx preservation in pyriform sinus cancer: preliminary results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase III Trial. EORTC Head Neck Cancer Cooperative Group J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 890–899.
- 26 Pressman JJ. Physiology of the vocal cords in phonation and respiration. Arch Otolaryngol 1942; 35: 355–398.
- 27 Isshiki N, Morita H, Okamura H, Hirameto M. Thyroplasty as new phonosurgical technique. Ada Otolaryngol 1974; 78: 451–457.
- 28 King EA. Clinical study of functioning of the maxillary sinus mucosa. Ann Otol 1935; 44: 480–482.
- 29 Hilding AC. Experimental sinus surgery: effects of operative windows on normal sinuses. Ann Otol 1941; 50: 379–392.
- 30 Messerklinger W. über die drainage der menschlichen nasennebenhohler unter normalen and pathologischen bendi-hgunger II mitterlung: Die stirnhohole and ihr ausfu-hrungssystem. Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol 1967; 101: 313–326.
- 31 Ishizaka K, Ishizaka T, Hornbrook MH. Physiochemical properties of reagenic antibody, V: correlation of reagenic activity with the E-globulin antibody. J Immunol 1966; 97: 840–853.
- 32 Wide L, Bennich H, Johansson SGO. Diagnosis of allergy by an in-vitro test for allergen antibiotics. Lancet 1967; 2: 1105–1107.
- 33 Daniel R, Taylor GI. Distant transfer of island flap by microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 52: 111–117.
- 34 Taylor GI, Miller GPH, Hain FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 55: 533–544.
- 35 Ganz R, Perren SM, Reuter A. Machinishe induktion der knochenresorption. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 1975; 19: 45–48.
- 36 Schenk RK, Willenegger H. Morphological findings in primary fracture healing. Symp Biol Hung 1967; 7: 75–86.
- 37 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Program Requirements: program requirements for resident education in otolaryngology,. Available at: http://www.acg-me.org/req/280pr797.asp. Accessed July 13, 2000.
- 38 Abramson M. Improving resident education: what does resident research really have to offer? Trans Am Acad Oph-thalmol Otolaryngol 1977; 84: 984–985.
- 39 Davis WK, Kelly WN. Factors influencing decisions to enter careers in clinical investigation. J Med Educ 1982; 57: 275–281.
- 40 Neinstein LS, MacKenzie RG. Prior training and recommendations for future training of clinical research faculty members. Acad Med 1989; 64: 32–35.
- 41 Naunton RF. Clinical research in otolaryngology at the University of Chicago. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1983; 102: 30–31.
- 42 Lenfant C. Report of the Task Forces for the Review of National Institutes of Health Biomédical Research Training Programs. Internal document of National Institutes of Health; Washington, DC; October 6, 1998.
- 43 Miller ED. Clinical investigators: the endangered species revisited. JAMA 2001; 286: 845–846.
Citing Literature
