Volume 108, Issue 11 pp. 1692-1696
Independent Papers

Bilateral radical neck dissection with unilateral internal jugular vein reconstruction

Pavel Dulguerov MD

Corresponding Author

Pavel Dulguerov MD

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, 24, rue Micheli-du-Crest, Geneva. CH 1205, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this author
Christian Soulier MD

Christian Soulier MD

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Jean Maurice MD

Jean Maurice MD

Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Bernard Faidutti MD

Bernard Faidutti MD

Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Abdelkarim S. Allal MD

Abdelkarim S. Allal MD

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Willy Lehmann MD

Willy Lehmann MD

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 October 2009
Citations: 30

Abstract

Objective: To describe and evaluate the functional and oncologic results of one internal jugular vein replacement after bilateral radical neck dissection (RND). Study Design: A retrospective historical cohort study. Methods: Since 1972 all patients (n = 9) undergoing bilateral RND with resection of both internal jugular veins had a reconstruction of one internal jugular vein. In six cases the RNDs were staged, and in three cases the RNDs were performed simultaneously. In every case a vascular reconstruction was performed with an autologous vein graft. All patients received radiation therapy, in five patients before and in four patients after the vein grafting. Functional results were evaluated in terms of postoperative head and neck and neurologic complications. In some patients a Doppler scan was performed to assess vein patency. Oncologic results are reported as relapse-free survival and mortality intervals. Results: In all patients the postoperative course was uneventful, without neurologic complications. Facial edema was noted in four patients, mild in three and moderate in one. Two patients are alive, with follow-ups of 8 and 18 years. Seven patients are dead, two without evidence of recurrence, four with cervical recurrence after a mean survival of 10 months, and one after distant metastasis after a survival of 7 years. In patients with long-term survival a Doppler scan confirmed the patency of the vein graft. Conclusion: The lack of operative complications and the absence of postoperative neurologic complications make a unilateral internal jugular vein replacement after bilateral RND attractive, although the oncologic results remain poor. Laryngoscope, 108:1692–1696, 1998

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.