Volume 11, Issue 6 pp. 631-632
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Free Access

Influence of gender of physicians and patients on guideline-recommended treatment of chronic heart failure in a cross-sectional study: reply

Magnus Baumhäkel

Corresponding Author

Magnus Baumhäkel

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of the Saarland, Kirrbergerstr, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany

Tel: +49 6841 16 23289 Fax: +49 6841 16 23381 Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Ulrike Müller

Ulrike Müller

AWD.pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Wasastraße 50, 01445 Radebeul, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Böhm

Michael Böhm

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of the Saarland, Kirrbergerstr, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 May 2009
Citations: 2

We thank Drs Duvernoy and Meier for their comments on our study.1 Evaluation of the influence of physicians' gender on quality of medical treatment is difficult to perform. You are right with the suggestion that controlled trials cannot be applied to this question. Thus, we chose an observational survey with all of its disadvantages. However, we tried to consider the possible confounders in the multivariate analysis. Nevertheless, we think that there might be an influence of physicians' gender on medical treatment of chronic heart failure in the population evaluated. Furthermore, there could be country-specific differences in health care systems or even education of physicians. Therefore, we suggest that similar studies should be performed in different countries and health care systems, because our results will not necessarily be valid in other countries.

Prescription of beta-blockers might be biased by higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in male patients. However, all patients should be treated with a beta-blocker regarding their history of heart failure. Thus, CAD should not influence beta-blocker treatment. As we discussed in the manuscript, aetiology of heart failure was not documented in the study. There might have been a gender-related difference in the incidence of diastolic heart failure that may have had an influence on our results, but nevertheless, we evaluated ‘real-life’ treatment of patients by GPs or specialists.

The population of the study, as well as the design (cross sectional), was too small for evaluation of clinical outcomes. Several publications have demonstrated a similar clinical outcome for female and male patients with chronic heart failure. This could imply that female patients might have a better outcome than male patients when treated similarly. We agree that this suggestion cannot be concluded from our study, but might attract attention for future trials.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.