Volume 5, Issue 4 pp. 189-206
Original Article

The governance of professional soccer: Five case studies – Algeria, China, England, France and Japan

Mahfoud Amara

Mahfoud Amara

Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy, Loughborough University, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Ian Henry

Corresponding Author

Ian Henry

Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy, Loughborough University, Japan

Correspondence: Ian Henry, Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE, 11 3TU, UK Phone: 44 1509 223262/63 44 1509 223935 E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jin Liang

Jin Liang

Tianjin Institute of Physical Education, PRC

Search for more papers by this author
Kazuo Uchiumi

Kazuo Uchiumi

Hitotsubashi University, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 August 2006
Citations: 26

Abstract

Although there has been a rapid growth in the globalisation of sport and its delivery to world markets, nevertheless there is a variety of models of sport-business whose characteristics are the product of local histories, local political and sporting cultures, local economic conditions and so on. This paper does not seek to deny the increasingly obvious impact of globalisation on professional sport, but rather it seeks to articulate the ways in which such global phenomena are locally mediated in professional soccer systems in five countries, to identify and to explain local responses to global pressures. The five examples include the oldest professional football system, that of England, and a second contrasting European system, France, together with three relatively recently established professional football systems in Japan a developed capitalist economy, Algeria, which is developing a post-socialist sports economy, and China which is experimenting in sport as in other areas with a ‘socialist market economy’. The resultant evolution of professional sporting systems represents distinctive configurations of stakeholders in what are in effect contrasting business models, and reflects a situation of ‘diminishing varieties and increasing contrasts’, in contrast to the claims made by Elias in relation to global cultural phenomena.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.