Volume 7, Issue 3 pp. 216-221

Iron Management in Hemodialysis Patients: Optimizing Outcomes in Vicenza, Italy

C. Crepaldi

Corresponding Author

C. Crepaldi

Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation and

Correspondence to:
Carlo Crepaldi, MD, Nephrology Department, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy 36100.
email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
A. Brendolan

A. Brendolan

Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation and

Search for more papers by this author
V. Bordoni

V. Bordoni

Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation and

Search for more papers by this author
M. R. Carta

M. R. Carta

Clinical Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.

Search for more papers by this author
V. D'Intini

V. D'Intini

Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation and

Search for more papers by this author
F. Gastaldon

F. Gastaldon

Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation and

Search for more papers by this author
P. Inguaggiato

P. Inguaggiato

Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation and

Search for more papers by this author
C. Ronco

C. Ronco

Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation and

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The management of anemia in uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis requires the appropriate combination of erythropoietin treatment, iron supplementation, and on occasion androgen therapy.

Identifying and correcting functional iron deficiency is crucial to optimizing erythropoietin efficiency. Recently, however, the trend to administer maintenance iron with resultant high serum ferritin and high transferrin saturation has led to an increase in reports of iron overload.

Oral iron supplementation is inexpensive and safe, but poor patient compliance and reduced intestinal absorption may limit its efficacy. Intravenous iron, on the other hand, is effective, and its safety is related to the iron salt used. Currently available data suggest that iron saccharate may be the safest iron salt available for intravenous administration, although iron gluconate is safer than the dextran forms of intravenous iron. It should be kept in mind, however, that all forms of intravenous iron may have the potential of inducing iron overload.

At this time, the levels of ferritin that define iron overload are not clearly established. The side effects of iron overload are well recognized (infections, malignancies, vascular diseases); however, no guidelines exist for safe practice. There are many markers of iron deficiency, with serum ferritin and hypochromic red cell percentage currently the best markers available in clinical practice.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.