Volume 342, Issue 3 pp. 725-737

The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the luminosity function of cluster galaxies

Roberto De Propris

Corresponding Author

Roberto De Propris

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Department of Astrophysics and Optics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Matthew Colless

Matthew Colless

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Simon P. Driver

Simon P. Driver

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Warrick Couch

Warrick Couch

Department of Astrophysics and Optics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
John A. Peacock

John A. Peacock

Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ

Search for more papers by this author
Ivan K. Baldry

Ivan K. Baldry

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Carlton M. Baugh

Carlton M. Baugh

Department of Physics, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
Joss Bland-Hawthorn

Joss Bland-Hawthorn

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Terry Bridges

Terry Bridges

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Russell Cannon

Russell Cannon

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Shaun Cole

Shaun Cole

Department of Physics, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Collins

Chris Collins

Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead, L14 1LD

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas Cross

Nicholas Cross

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gavin B. Dalton

Gavin B. Dalton

Department of Physics, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH

Search for more papers by this author
George Efstathiou

George Efstathiou

Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard S. Ellis

Richard S. Ellis

Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos S. Frenk

Carlos S. Frenk

Department of Physics, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
Karl Glazebrook

Karl Glazebrook

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Edward Hawkins

Edward Hawkins

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD

Search for more papers by this author
Carole Jackson

Carole Jackson

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ofer Lahav

Ofer Lahav

Department of Physics, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH

Search for more papers by this author
Ian Lewis

Ian Lewis

Department of Physics, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH

Search for more papers by this author
Stuart Lumsden

Stuart Lumsden

Department of Physics and Astronomy, E C Stoner Building, Leeds LS2 9JT

Search for more papers by this author
Steve Maddox

Steve Maddox

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD

Search for more papers by this author
Darren S. Madgwick

Darren S. Madgwick

Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA

Search for more papers by this author
Peder Norberg

Peder Norberg

Department of Physics, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
Will Percival

Will Percival

Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce Peterson

Bruce Peterson

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Will Sutherland

Will Sutherland

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Keith Taylor

Keith Taylor

Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 June 2003
Citations: 45

ABSTRACT

We have determined the composite luminosity function (LF) for galaxies in 60 clusters from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey. The LF spans the range −22.5 < Murn:x-wiley:00358711:media:MNR6510:tex2gif-sub-1 < −15, and is well fitted by a Schechter function with M*urn:x-wiley:00358711:media:MNR6510:tex2gif-sub-3=−20.07 ± 0.07 and α=−1.28 ± 0.03 (H0= 100 km s−1 Mpc−1, ΩM= 0.3, ΩΛ= 0.7). It differs significantly from the field LF, having a characteristic magnitude that is approximately 0.3 mag brighter and a faint-end slope that is approximately 0.1 steeper. There is no evidence for variations in the LF across a wide range of cluster properties: the LF is similar for clusters with high and low velocity dispersions, for rich and poor clusters, for clusters with different Bautz–Morgan types, and for clusters with and without substructure. The core regions of clusters differ from the outer parts, however, in having an excess of very bright galaxies. We also construct the LFs for early (quiescent), intermediate and late (star-forming) spectral types. We find that, as in the field, the LFs of earlier-type galaxies have brighter characteristic magnitudes and shallower faint-end slopes. However, the LF of early-type galaxies in clusters is both brighter and steeper than its field counterpart, although the LF of late-type galaxies is very similar. The trend of faint-end slope with spectral type is therefore much less pronounced in clusters than in the field, explaining why variations in the mixture of types do not lead to significant differences in the cluster LFs. The differences between the field and cluster LFs for the various spectral types can be qualitatively explained by the suppression of star formation in the dense cluster environment, together with mergers to produce the brightest early-type galaxies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.