Volume 333, Issue 4 pp. 961-968

The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the amplitudes of fluctuations in the 2dFGRS and the CMB, and implications for galaxy biasing

Ofer Lahav

Corresponding Author

Ofer Lahav

Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Sarah L. Bridle

Sarah L. Bridle

Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA

Search for more papers by this author
Will J. Percival

Will J. Percival

Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ

Search for more papers by this author
John A. Peacock

John A. Peacock

Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ

Search for more papers by this author
George Efstathiou

George Efstathiou

Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA

Search for more papers by this author
Carlton M. Baugh

Carlton M. Baugh

Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
Joss Bland-Hawthorn

Joss Bland-Hawthorn

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Terry Bridges

Terry Bridges

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Russell Cannon

Russell Cannon

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Shaun Cole

Shaun Cole

Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew Colless

Matthew Colless

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Collins

Chris Collins

Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Birkenhead L14 1LD

Search for more papers by this author
Warrick Couch

Warrick Couch

Department of Astrophysics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Gavin Dalton

Gavin Dalton

Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH

Search for more papers by this author
Roberto De Propris

Roberto De Propris

Department of Astrophysics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Simon P. Driver

Simon P. Driver

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY6 9SS

Search for more papers by this author
Richard S. Ellis

Richard S. Ellis

Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos S. Frenk

Carlos S. Frenk

Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
Karl Glazebrook

Karl Glazebrook

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218-2686, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Carole Jackson

Carole Jackson

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ian Lewis

Ian Lewis

Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH

Search for more papers by this author
Stuart Lumsden

Stuart Lumsden

Department of Physics, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT

Search for more papers by this author
Steve Maddox

Steve Maddox

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD

Search for more papers by this author
Darren S. Madgwick

Darren S. Madgwick

Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Moody

Stephen Moody

Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA

Search for more papers by this author
Peder Norberg

Peder Norberg

Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce A. Peterson

Bruce A. Peterson

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Will Sutherland

Will Sutherland

Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ

Search for more papers by this author
Keith Taylor

Keith Taylor

Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 July 2002
Citations: 59

1 As shown in P01, the likelihood analysis gives a second (non-standard) solution, with Ωmh∼0.6, and the baryon fraction Ωbm=0.4, which generates baryonic ‘wiggles’. We ignore this case in the present analysis and use the likelihood function over the range 0.1<Ωmh<0.3, 0.0<Ωbm<0.4, 0.4<h<0.9 and . We also note that, even if there are features in the primordial power spectrum, they would get washed out by the 2dFGRS window function ( Elgaroy, Gramann & Lahav 2002).

2 We emphasize again that here σ8g is the linear-theory normalization, not the observed non-linear σ8gNL. For example, the 2dFGRS correlation function of Norberg et al. (2001a) can be translated to a non-linear , at an effective redshift of approximately 0.07. In practice, non-linear corrections to σ8 are expected to be relatively small for CDM-like spectra (see Fig. 1).

3 More precisely, the redshift-space distortion factor depends on the auto power spectra Pmm(k) and Pgg(k) for the mass and the galaxies, and on the mass–galaxies cross power spectrum Pmg(k) ( Pen 1998; Dekel & Lahav 1999; Tegmark et al. 2001). The model of equations (3)–(5) is only valid for a scale-independent bias factor b that obeys Pgg(k)=bPmg(k)=b2Pmm(k).

Abstract

We compare the amplitudes of fluctuations probed by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) and by the latest measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. By combining the 2dFGRS and CMB data, we find the linear-theory rms mass fluctuations in 8 h−1 Mpc spheres to be σ8m=0.73±0.05 (after marginalization over the matter density parameter Ωm and three other free parameters). This normalization is lower than the COBE normalization and previous estimates from cluster abundance, but it is in agreement with some revised cluster abundance determinations. We also estimate the scale-independent bias parameter of present-epoch Ls=1.9L APM-selected galaxies to be b(Ls,z=0)=1.10±0.08 on comoving scales of 0.02<k<0.15 h Mpc-1. If luminosity segregation operates on these scales, L∗ galaxies would be almost unbiased, b (L*, z=0)≈0.96. These results are derived by assuming a flat ΛCDM Universe, and by marginalizing over other free parameters and fixing the spectral index n=1 and the optical depth due to reionization τ=0. We also study the best-fitting pair (Ωm, b), and the robustness of the results to varying n and τ. Various modelling corrections can each change the resulting b by 5–15 per cent. The results are compared with other independent measurements from the 2dFGRS itself, and from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), cluster abundance and cosmic shear.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.