Volume 7, Issue 1 pp. 51-60

Developing community mental health services: an evaluation of Glasgow’s mental health resource centres

Claudia J. Martin MA, PhD

Claudia J. Martin MA, PhD

Scottish Health Feedback, 5 Leamington Terrace, Edinburgh, UK,,

Search for more papers by this author
Linda De Caestecker MBChB, MRCOG, MFPHM

Linda De Caestecker MBChB, MRCOG, MFPHM

Department of Public Health, Greater Glasgow Health Board, Glasgow, UK,,

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Hunter BSc, MBChB, MD, MRCPsych

Robert Hunter BSc, MBChB, MD, MRCPsych

Community and Mental Health Services NHS Trust, Glasgow, UK,,

Search for more papers by this author
Alan Gilloran MA, PhD

Alan Gilloran MA, PhD

Department of Management and Social Sciences, Queen Margaret College, Edinburgh, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Allsobrook BA

Daniel Allsobrook BA

Scottish Health Feedback, 5 Leamington Terrace, Edinburgh, UK,,

Search for more papers by this author
Lyn M. Jones MA

Lyn M. Jones MA

Scottish Health Feedback, 5 Leamington Terrace, Edinburgh, UK,,

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 February 2002
Citations: 8
Dr Claudia J. Martin Research Director Scottish Health Feedback 5 Leamington Terrace Edinburgh EH10 4JW UK

Abstract

Greater Glasgow Health Board’s strategy for the development of community mental health services includes the establishment, over a 7-year period, of multi-disciplinary community mental health resource centres throughout Glasgow. An evaluation of the first phase of the development was carried out in three resource centres. This focused on three key themes: the establishment of multi-disciplinary teams, targeting of those with the most severe illnesses and the participation of users in the care process. The evaluation exercise comprised five substantive elements: analysis of the clinical database; interviews with staff within each of those centres, interviews with representatives of key external agencies associated with each centre; a survey of general practitioners; and a survey of the views of clients, their carers, their key workers, and their general practitioners (GPs). Clients were generally very satisfied with the services and felt that the resource centres met all their mental health needs. Although the majority of current centre cases had severe mental illnesses and those with the more severe conditions had the highest contact rates there was evidence that in the absence of a clear framework for referral the centres were also providing services for those with less severe illnesses. Despite a wish by centre staff to move towards modes of working less dominated by health professionals and more inclusive of other resources and especially of clients themselves, these goals remained to be achieved: there was a lack of clarity in the definition of the appropriate target groups for the centres; access to crisis support was regarded as problematic; the concept of multi-disciplinary team working had yet to be fully realized with evidence suggesting that some psychiatrists working in the resource centres had not embraced many aspects of the new approach to service delivery including a focus on the severely ill; and progress towards the ideal of active client involvement had been slow.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.