Volume 119, Issue 3 pp. 720-725

The prospective evaluation of a nested polymerase chain reaction assay for the early detection of Aspergillus infection in patients with leukaemia or undergoing allograft treatment

R. Bridget Ferns

R. Bridget Ferns

Department of Virology, and

Search for more papers by this author
Helen Fletcher

Helen Fletcher

Centre for Infectious Diseases, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Windeyer Institute of Medical Sciences, London,

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Bradley

Susan Bradley

Department of Haematology, and

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Mackinnon

Stephen Mackinnon

Department of Haematology, and

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Hunt

Chris Hunt

Department of Bacteriology, University College Hospital London Trust, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Richard S. Tedder

Richard S. Tedder

Department of Virology, and

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 November 2002
Citations: 35
R. Bridget Ferns, Department of Virology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Windeyer Institute of Medical Sciences, 46 Cleveland Street, London, W1T 4JF, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Summary. Patients with acute leukaemia or undergoing allogenic bone marrow transplantation at University College London Hospital Trust were screened for the presence of aspergillosis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Aspergillus DNA, from whole blood samples, was amplified by nested PCR to detect a 135 bp fragment in the mitochondrial region of Aspergillus fumigatus or A. flavus (121 bp). One colony-forming unit (CFU) per 2 ml of blood or 1–10 fg DNA could be detected. Patients at risk of aspergillosis were classified as probable or possible based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer definitions. Antifungal drugs given were recorded. In four of 17 patients studied, infection was not suspected and the PCR was negative. Four patients were considered to have possible aspergillosis infection and were PCR positive on at least one occasion. Of the three patients in the probable group, four of the nine samples tested PCR positive from one patient and in another patient only one of nine samples tested positive. The remaining six patients were not suspected of having fungal infection but each had one or two PCR-positive results. In summary, six of seven patients thought to have clinical evidence of infection were PCR positive on at least one occasion and treatment with antifungals may have reduced infection below detectable levels.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.