Volume 13, Issue 11 pp. 1419-1427

Alosetron relieves pain and improves bowel function compared with mebeverine in female nonconstipated irritable bowel syndrome patients

Jones

Jones

Department of General Practice, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Holtmann

Holtmann

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Essen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Rodrigo

Rodrigo

Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ehsanullah

Ehsanullah

Gastroenterology Clinical Development, Stockley Park, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Crompton

Crompton

Clinical Statistics, Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Stockley Park, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Jacques

Jacques

Gastroenterology Clinical Development, Stockley Park, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Mills

Mills

Gastroenterology Clinical Development, Stockley Park, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 December 2001
Citations: 96
Jane Mills Gastroenterology Clinical Development Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1BT, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

: Irritable bowel syndrome is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders, yet no therapy convincingly controls the multiple symptoms of this syndrome.

Aim

: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the new 5-HT3-receptor antagonist alosetron and the smooth muscle relaxant mebeverine in a double-blind, multicentre, randomized trial.

Methods

: Six hundred and twenty-three nonconstipated females with irritable bowel syndrome were randomized to receive alosetron 1 mg twice daily (n=319) or mebeverine 135 mg three times daily (n=304) for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week post-treatment period. The primary efficacy end-point was monthly responders for adequate relief of irritable bowel syndrome related abdominal pain and discomfort (defined as patients reporting adequate relief on at least 2 out of 4 weeks). Secondary end-points included assessments of bowel function, including urgency, stool frequency and stool consistency.

Results

: There were significantly more responders in the alosetron group compared with mebeverine at months 2 and 3 (P < 0.01). Compared with mebeverine, the alosetron group experienced significant decreases in proportion of days with urgency and mean stool frequency, and had firmer stools within 1 week of starting treatment. A similar proportion of patients reported adverse events in the two treatment groups.

Conclusions

: In nonconstipated female irritable bowel syndrome patients, alosetron is significantly more effective than mebeverine in improving symptoms.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.