The responsibility to care for single homeless people
Corresponding Author
Maureen Crane
RGN RMN MSc PhD
Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing, University of Sheffield, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
CorrespondenceLeverhulme Research Fellow Maureen Crane Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing University of Sheffield Community Sciences Centre Northern General Hospital Sheffield S5 7AU UK E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAnthony M. Warnes
BA PhD AcSS
Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing, University of Sheffield, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Maureen Crane
RGN RMN MSc PhD
Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing, University of Sheffield, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
CorrespondenceLeverhulme Research Fellow Maureen Crane Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing University of Sheffield Community Sciences Centre Northern General Hospital Sheffield S5 7AU UK E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAnthony M. Warnes
BA PhD AcSS
Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing, University of Sheffield, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper examines the reasons why in contemporary Britain many single homeless people with severe physical and mental health problems and welfare needs do not receive the treatment, care and financial support that they manifestly need, and in particular considers the interaction between their personal characteristics and the organisation and the obligations of services. Homelessness is a complex concept associated with problems of housing, health, social care and income. The greatest weaknesses of the service system are that no single agency has a statutory responsibility to ensure that vulnerable homeless people are served, and none of the generalist welfare agencies have a duty to seek out those who do not present. As a result, single homeless people fall between the housing, health and social services and amass exceptional unmet needs. The paper appraises the approaches to single homeless people’s problems that have recently been introduced by the Rough Sleepers’ Unit (RSU), and discusses the ways in which current reforms of the welfare services may impact on the situation of homeless people. With the possibility that the RSU’s prime responsibility for commissioning single homeless people’s services will transfer to local authorities in 2002, the paper concludes by specifying the implications for voluntary and statutory providers and makes recommendations about the attribution of the responsibility to care for this vulnerable group.
References
- Anderson P. (1992) Primary care physicians and alcohol. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 85, 478 – 482.
- Audit Commission (1998) Home Alone: the Role of Housing in Community Care. Audit Commission, London.
- Barwood A. (2000) Towards a Common Cause –‘A Compact of Care’: Inspection of Local Authority Social Services and Voluntary Sector Working Relationships. Department of Health, London.
- Cohen C., Ramirez M., Teresi J., Gallagher M. & Sokolovsky J. (1997) Predictors of becoming redomiciled among older homeless women. Gerontologist 37 (1), 67 – 74.
- Cohen C. & Sokolovsky J. (1989) Old Men of the Bowery: Strategies for Survival among the Homeless. Guilford Press, New York.
- Crane M. (1999) Understanding Older Homeless People: Their Circumstances, Problems and Needs. Open University Press, Buckingham.
- Crane M. & Warnes A.M. (1997) Homeless Truths: Challenging the Myths about Older Homeless People. Help the Aged and Crisis, London.
- Crane M. & Warnes A.M. (2000a) Lessons from Lancefield Street: Tackling the Needs of Older Homeless People. National Homeless Alliance, London.
- Crane M. & Warnes A.M. (2000b) An Evaluation of the Housing Teams. Report for Thames Reach Housing Association. Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
- Crane M. & Warnes A.M. (2001a) Single Homeless People in London: Profiles of Service Users and Perceptions of Needs. Report for Bondway, St Mungo’s and Thames Reach. Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
- Crane M. & Warnes A.M. (2001b) Older people and homelessness: prevalence and causes. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 16 (4), 1 – 14.
- Crane M. & Warnes A.M. (2001c) Primary health-care services for single homeless people: defects and opportunities. Family Practice 18 (3), 272 – 276.
- Deehan A., Taylor C. & Strang J. (1997) The general practitioner, the drug misuser, and the alcohol misuser: major differences in general practitioner activity, therapeutic commitment, and ‘shared care’ proposals. British Journal of General Practice 47, 705 – 709.
- Department of Health (1998) Deprived Areas to Benefit from a £25 Million Boost. Circular 98/584. Department of Health, London.
- Department of Health (1999) National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service Models. Department of Health, London.
- Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1999) Annual Report on Rough Sleeping. DETR, London.
- Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR) and Department of Social Security (DSS) (2000) Quality and Choice: A Decent Home for All: The Way Forward for Housing. DETR and DSS, London.
- Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, Department of Health, Department of Social Security (DSS), HM Treasury, The Home Office, the Scottish Office, The Welsh Office & The Women’s Unit (1998) Supporting People: A New Policy and Funding Framework for Support Services. DSS, Hayes, Middlesex.
- Edgar B., Doherty J. & Mina-Coull A. (1999) Services for Homeless People: Innovation and Change in the European Union. Policy Press, Bristol.
- Fisher K. & Collins J. (1993) Access to health care. In: K. Fisher & J. Collins (Eds) Homelessness, Health Care and Welfare Provision, pp. 32 – 50. Routledge, London.
- Gelberg L., Linn L. & Mayer-Oakes S.A. (1990) Differences in health status between older and younger homeless adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 38, 1220 – 1229.
- Harrison M. (1996) Emergency Hostels: Direct Access Accommodation in London 1996. Single Homelessness in London and the London Borough Grants Committee, London.
- Hewitt K. (1999) Back on the Streets: A Study into Eviction from Direct Access Hostels. Novas-Ouvertures Group, London.
- Holmes C. (2001) Caught before they fall. Inside Housing, 12 January, pp. 20 – 21.
- Housing Services Agency (1999) The Outreach Directory Annual Statistics 1998–99. Housing Services Agency, London.
- Kershaw A., Singelton N. & Meltzer H. (2000) Survey of the Health and Well-Being of Homeless People in Glasgow. Office for National Statistics, London.
- Kutza E. (1987) A Study of Undomiciled Elderly Persons in Chicago: A Final Report. Retirement Research Foundation, Chicago.
- Lowe S. (1997) Homelessness and the law. In: R. Burrows, N. Pleace & D. Quilgars (Eds) Homelessness and Social Policy, pp. 19 – 34. Routledge, London.
- Maldonado J.L. & Romano M.T.L. (1997) European Observatory on Homelessness: Annual Report on Homelessness in Spain 1997. European Federation of National Organisations Working With the Homeless (FEANTSA), Brussels.
- National Health Service Executive (1999) Allocation of DDRB £60 Million to GPs. Health Service Circular 1999/107. Department of Health, Wetherby, Yorkshire.
- Niner P. (1989) Homelessness in Nine Local Authorities: Case Studies of Policy and Practice. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
- North C., Ritchie J. & Ward K. (1993) Factors Influencing the Implementation of the Care Programme Approach. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
- Office of National Statistics (2000) Britain 2001: The Official Yearbook of the United Kingdom. Stationery Office, London.
- Pannell J. & Parry S. (1999) Implementing ‘joined-up thinking’: multi-agency services for single homeless people in Bristol. In: P. Kennett & A. Marsh (Eds) Homelessness: Exploring the New Terrain, pp. 239 – 265. Policy Press, Bristol.
- Pleace N., Jones A. & England J. (2000) Access to General Practice for People Sleeping Rough. Centre for Housing Policy, University of York, York.
- Pleace N. & Quilgars D. (1996) Health and Homelessness in London: A Review. King’s Fund, London.
- Rough Sleepers Unit (2000) Coming in from the Cold: Progress Report on the Government’s Strategy on Rough Sleeping. DETR, London.
- Rummery K. & Glendinning C. (2000) Access to services as a civil and social rights issue: the role of welfare professionals in regulating access to and commissioning services for disabled and older people under New Labour. Social Policy and Administration 34 (5), 529 – 550.
- Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health (1998) Keys to Engagement: Review of Care for People with Severe Mental Illness who are Hard to Engage with Services. The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, London.
- Vázquez C., Muñoz M. & Rodriguez-Gonzales A. (1999) Spain. In: C. Helvie & W. Kunstmann (Eds) Homelessness in the United States, Europe and Russia, pp. 169 – 205. Bergin and Garvey, Westport, Connecticut.
- Warnes A.M. & Crane M. (2000a) Meeting Homeless People’s Needs: Service Development and Practice for the Older Excluded. King’s Fund, London.
- Warnes A.M. & Crane M. (2000b) The achievements of a multiservice project for older homeless people. Gerontologist 40 (5), 618 – 626.
- Williams S. (1995) Review of Primary Care Projects for Homeless People. Final Report for the Department of Health. Department of Health, London.