Volume 9, Issue 5 pp. 294-308

Socio-economic and locational determinants of accessibility and utilization of primary health-care

Ken S. Field Bsc PhD FBCart.S

Corresponding Author

Ken S. Field Bsc PhD FBCart.S

University College Northampton, Park Campus, Boughton Green Road, Northampton NN2 7AL and

CorrespondenceKen S. Field University College Northampton Park Campus Boughton Green Road Northampton NN2 7AL UK E-mail:[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
David J. Briggs BA PhD

David J. Briggs BA PhD

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 December 2001
Citations: 125

Abstract

Differences in levels of utilization vary and are a function of socio-economic and geographical factors. This paper presents the results of a questionnaire study involving twelve GP practices in Northamptonshire, UK, of factors which affect access and utilization in asthmatics and diabetics; these groups were selected to control for differences in utilization behaviour, as a result of different aetiologies. The questionnaire sought data on: residential location of patients, utilization characteristics of primary health-care, personal circumstances and mobility and hindrances to access and utilization. Key themes were identified relating to age, gender, social class, employment, ethnicity and proximity to the GP surgery. The young, elderly and females report higher rates of utilization, as do nonmanual workers and those who are unemployed. However, accessibility and utilization vary greatly in response to mobility and locational characteristics; these variations tend to be masked by data on overall rates of usage. Optimal scaling techniques were used to investigate the interactions between the factors affecting accessibility and utilization, and to characterize patients in terms of their levels of utilization. Results confirmed that current service provision afforded a differential level of service to patients, which does not directly reflect their level of need.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.