Volume 11, Issue 5 pp. 441-447

A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures; five-years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants

Henny J. A. Meijer

Henny J. A. Meijer

Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;

Search for more papers by this author
Gerry M. Raghoebar

Gerry M. Raghoebar

Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;

Search for more papers by this author
Martin A. Van 't Hof

Martin A. Van 't Hof

Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen;

Search for more papers by this author
Anita Visser

Anita Visser

Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;

Search for more papers by this author
Mariëlle E. Geertman

Mariëlle E. Geertman

Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Robert P. Van Oort

Robert P. Van Oort

Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen;

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 December 2001
Citations: 35
Dr H. J. A. Meijer, Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
Tel.: 31 (0) 50 3612167
Fax: 31 (0) 50 3611136

Abstract

The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate a set of clinical items and prosthetic aftercare of edentulous patients with a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 IMZ implants or 2 Brånemark implants during a 5-years' period. Patients were allocated to the IMZ group (n=29) or the Brånemark group (n=32) by a computerized balancing method. In the IMZ group 4 implants were lost during the 5-years' follow-up (survival rate: 93%). In the Brånemark group 9 implants were lost (survival rate: 86%). All patients were re-operated successfully. Multiple prosthetic revisions were necessary in both groups, especially the precision attachment system in the overdenture was subject to frequent fracture or loosening. From this study can be concluded that there is no difference in clinical state, radiographical state, survival rate and clinical implant performance between the IMZ implant system and the Brånemark implant system supporting an overdenture on 2 implants after 5 years of follow-up.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.