Volume 2, Issue 2 pp. 81-90
Full Access

The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth

T. Berglundh

T. Berglundh

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
J. Lindhe

J. Lindhe

Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;

Search for more papers by this author
I. Ericsson

I. Ericsson

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
C. P. Marinello

C. P. Marinello

Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;

Search for more papers by this author
B. Liljenberg

B. Liljenberg

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
P. Thornsen

P. Thornsen

Department of Anatomy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: April‐June 1991
Citations: 617
Tord Berglundh, Department of Periodontology, School of Dentisty, University of Gothenburg, Box 33070, S-40033 Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract

In the present animal experiment. analyses and comparisons were made between the structure and composition of clinically healthy supraalveolar soft tissues adjacent to implants and teeth. 5 beagle dogs were used. The right mandibular premolar region was selected in each dog for placement of titanium implants. while the left mandibular premolar region served as control. Extractions of the mandibular premolars were performed. healing allowed, following which titanium fixtures were installed in the edentolous premolar region. Abutment connection was carried out 3 months later. After another 2 months of healing. plaque control was initiated and maintained for 8 weeks. At the end of the plaque control period. clinical examinations were performed and biopsies harvested from the implant site and the contralateral premolar tooth region. Following fixation and decalcification, all tissue samples were embedded in EPON and examined by histometric and morphometric means. The result from the analyses demonstrated that the peri-implant mucosa which formed at titanium implants following abutment connection had many features in common with gingival tissue at teeth. Thus, like the gingiva. the peri-implant mucosa established a cuff-like barrier which adhered to the surface of the titanium abutment. Further. both the gingiva and the peri-implant mucosa had a well-keratinized oral epithelium which was continuous with a junctional epithelium that faced the enamel or the titanium surface. In the periimplant mucosa. the collagen fibers appeared to commence at the marginal bone and were parallel with the abutment surface. All gingival and peri-implant units examined were free from infiltrates of inflammatory cells. It was suggested that under the conditions of study. both types of soft tissues. gingiva and peri-implant mucosa. have a proper potential to prevent subgingival I plaque formation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.