Volume 107, Issue s179 pp. 52-76

A critical discussion of the role of neuroimaging in mild cognitive impairment*

Henrike Wolf

Henrike Wolf

Karolinska Institutet, Neurotec, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Vesna Jelic

Vesna Jelic

Karolinska Institutet, Neurotec, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Hermann-Josef Gertz

Hermann-Josef Gertz

Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Agneta Nordberg

Agneta Nordberg

Karolinska Institutet, Neurotec, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Per Julin

Per Julin

Karolinska Institutet, Neurotec, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Lars-Olof Wahlund

Lars-Olof Wahlund

Karolinska Institutet, Neurotec, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 February 2003
Citations: 158
Henrike Wolf, Karolinska Institutet, Neurotec, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Huddinge Sjukhus, B84, S-14186 Huddinge, Sweden
e-mail: [email protected]
*

Throughout this paper, the designation mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is used as a generic term for all cognitive changes observed in ageing that are insufficient to meet dementia criteria. When reference is made to one of the specific concepts named MCI (such as MCI according to Zaudig, MCI according to Petersen), this is made clear in the text.

Abstract

Objective – In this paper, the current neuroimaging literature is reviewed with regard to characteristic findings in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Particular attention is drawn to the possible value of neuroimaging modalities in the prediction and early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Methods – First, the potential contribution of neuroimaging to an early, preclinical diagnosis of degenerative disorders is discussed at the background of our knowledge about the pathogenesis of AD. Second, relevant neuroimaging studies focusing on MCI are explored and summarized. Neuroimaging studies were found through Medline search and by systematically checking through the bibliographies of relevant articles.

Results – Structural volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET)/single photon emission tomography (SPECT) are currently the most commonly used neuroimaging modalities in studies focusing on MCI. There were considerable variations in demographical and clinical characteristics across studies. However, significant hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volume reductions were consistently found in subjects with MCI as compared with cognitively unimpaired controls. While hippocampal and entorhinal cortex atrophy in subjects with MCI are also well-established risk factors for the development of AD, these measures cannot be regarded as being of high predictive value in an individual case. Evidence for other typical neuroimaging changes in MCI is still scarce. In PET and SPECT studies, reduced blood flow and/or glucose metabolism in temporoparietal association areas, posterior cingulate and hippocampus were associated with a higher risk of progressive cognitive decline in MCI. In quantitative electroencephalogram (QEEG), low beta, high theta, low alpha and slowed mean frequency were associated with development of dementia.

Conclusions – Existing studies suggest that neuroimaging measures have the potential to become valuable tools in the early diagnosis of AD. To establish their value in routine use, larger studies, preferably with long prospective follow-up are needed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.