Volume 14, Issue 5 pp. 401-404

Urinary leukotriene E4 levels in children with allergic rhinitis treated with specific immunotherapy and anti-IgE (Omalizumab)

Matthias Volkmar Kopp

Matthias Volkmar Kopp

University Children Hospital, Freiburg

Search for more papers by this author
Ertan Mayatepek

Ertan Mayatepek

Düsseldorf

Search for more papers by this author
Eva Engels

Eva Engels

University Children Hospital, Freiburg

Search for more papers by this author
Jens Brauburger

Jens Brauburger

Novartis Pharma GmbH Research Group, Nuernberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Frank Riedinger

Frank Riedinger

Novartis Pharma GmbH Research Group, Nuernberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Gabriele Ihorst

Gabriele Ihorst

University Children Hospital, Freiburg

Search for more papers by this author
Ulrich WahnJoachim Kuehr

Joachim Kuehr

University Children Hospital, Freiburg

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 October 2003
Citations: 11
Matthias V. Kopp, University Children's Hospital, Mathildenstraße 1, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
Tel.: +49 761 270 4301
Fax: +49 761 270 4450
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Recently, we were able to demonstrate that Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, reduces in vitro leukotriene (LT) release of peripheral leukocytes stimulated with allergen in children with allergic rhinitis undergoing allergen immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of anti-IgE in combination with specific immunotherapy (SIT) on urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) levels. Children and adolescents with sensitization to birch and grass pollens and suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis were included in a phase III, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical study. Within the four-arm study, patients were randomized to receive SIT for either birch or grass pollen and to receive either subcutaneous anti-IgE or placebo for 24 weeks during the pollen season. From a total population of 225 children, we collected three urine samples in a subgroup of 19 children [n = 12 boys (63%); mean age 11.8 years; range 7.2–17.5 years; Group A (n = 10): SIT (grass or birch) + anti-IgE; Group B (n = 9): SIT (grass or birch) + placebo]. Urine samples were collected before, during and at the end of treatment. Endogenous urinary LTE4 was separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and determined by enzyme immunoassay with a specific antibody. No differences in urinary LTE4 concentrations were observed between the anti-IgE and the placebo groups before (A: 35.2; B: 36.5 nmol/mol creatinine), during (A: 27.0; B: 29.3) and after treatment (A: 28.9; B: 26.5 nmol/mol creatinine). We conclude that urinary LTE4 levels are not helpful in monitoring patients treated with anti-IgE and SIT.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.