Volume 9, Issue 8 pp. 743-750
Original Research—CME

A Randomized Dose Escalation Study of Intravenous Baclofen in Healthy Volunteers: Clinical Tolerance and Pharmacokinetics

Natalie S. Schmitz PharmD

Natalie S. Schmitz PharmD

Center for Orphan Drug Research, Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Disclosures related to this publication: grants, Paralyzed Veterans of America, Allaysis LLC; nonfinancial support, Allaysis LLC

Search for more papers by this author
Linda E. Krach MD

Linda E. Krach MD

Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, Part of Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN

Disclosures related to this publication: other, Allaysis (potential future royalties)

Search for more papers by this author
Lisa D. Coles PhD

Lisa D. Coles PhD

Center for Orphan Drug Research, Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Disclosure: nothing to disclose

Search for more papers by this author
Usha Mishra MS

Usha Mishra MS

Center for Orphan Drug Research, Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Disclosure: nothing to disclose

Search for more papers by this author
Suresh K. Agarwal PhD

Suresh K. Agarwal PhD

Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Abbvie Inc, North Chicago, IL

Disclosures related to this publication: grants, Paralyzed Veterans of America and Allaysis (money to institution)

Search for more papers by this author
James C. Cloyd PharmD

James C. Cloyd PharmD

Center for Orphan Drug Research, Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Disclosures related to this publication: grants, Allaysis (payment to the University of Minnesota for technical services provided to Allaysis) and Paralyzed Veterans of America

Search for more papers by this author
Robert L. Kriel MD

Corresponding Author

Robert L. Kriel MD

Center for Orphan Drug Research, Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, 2001 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Disclosures related to this publication: contract to University of Minnesota from Allaysis LLC; other, potential future royalties

Address correspondence to: R.L.K.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 November 2016
Citations: 17
This journal-based CME activity is designated for 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ and can be completed online at www.me.aapmr.org. This activity is FREE to AAPM&R members and available to nonmembers for a nominal fee. For assistance with claiming CME for this activity, please contact (847) 737-6000.
Presented in part to the annual meetings of the American Academy of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation in Boston, MA, October 1-4, 2015; and of the Child Neurology Society in Washington, DC, October 7-15, 2015.
The study was done under Investigational New Drug (IND) application study number 116025, and is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT01931319.
Peer reviewers and all others who control content have no financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract

Background

Abrupt discontinuation of baclofen can result in a potentially severe withdrawal syndrome. The current treatment for baclofen withdrawal is inadequate, resulting in a critical need to develop an alternative method to prevent or treat this withdrawal syndrome.

Objective

To evaluate the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of oral (PO) and investigational intravenous (IV) baclofen formulations at clinically relevant doses.

Design

Randomized, open-label, dose-escalation, crossover study.

Setting

Contract Research Organization (CRO).

Methods

Three cohorts of 12 healthy adults received single doses of PO baclofen (10 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg) and 10-minute infusions of IV baclofen (7.5 mg, 11.5 mg, or 15 mg) with a minimum 48-hour wash-out period. The third cohort also received a 60-minute infusion of 15 mg IV baclofen after an additional 48-hour wash-out period.

Main Outcome Measures

Subjects were observed in a CRO for 24 hours after each dose of baclofen, and were assessed for nystagmus, ataxia, and sedation. Blood samples were collected from 0 to 24 hours and analyzed for baclofen concentration using high-performance liquid chromatography−mass spectroscopy. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. Dose linearity and proportionality was assessed using 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance and a power model analysis.

Results

None of the PO or IV doses resulted in significant sedation compared to baseline. All subjects could perform tandem gait after each baclofen dose. The most common side effect, transient mild nystagmus, was noted in 4 of 36 and in 13 of 36 subjects after PO and IV administration, respectively. This was likely related to increased maximum concentrations (Cmax). After the 20 mg PO and 15 mg IV doses, mean Cmax levels were 255 and 722 ng/mL and half-lives were 5.24 and 5.79 hours for PO and IV baclofen, respectively. The mean oral bioavailability for the 20-mg PO dose was approximately 80%.

Conclusions

All PO and IV doses of baclofen were well tolerated clinically. The 80% bioavailability suggests that a 20% reduction in IV dose will produce comparable total drug exposures to that of the PO dose. When PO therapy is interrupted, bridging with IV baclofen may be feasible.

Level of Evidence

II

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.