Volume 3, Issue 8 pp. 697-705
Original Research

Ultrasound Measurement of Transversus Abdominis During Loaded, Functional Tasks in Asymptomatic Individuals: Rater Reliability

Todd Watson DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT

Corresponding Author

Todd Watson DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT

Department of Physical Therapy, 319 Moore Bldg, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28715

Disclosure: nothing to discloseAddress correspondence to: T.W.Search for more papers by this author
Sue McPherson PhD

Sue McPherson PhD

Department of Physical Therapy, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC

Disclosure: nothing to discloseSearch for more papers by this author
Sherry Fleeman MD

Sherry Fleeman MD

Asheville Radiology Associates, Asheville, NC

Disclosure: nothing to discloseSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 13 July 2011
Citations: 17
Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org
Peer reviewers and all others who control content have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
This CME activity is designated for 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ and can be completed online at me.aapmr.org. Log on to www.me.aapmr.org, go to Lifelong Learning (CME) and select Journal-based CME from the drop down menu. This activity is FREE to AAPM&R members and $25 for non-members.

Abstract

Objective

To examine the ability of 2 clinicians to consistently measure recorded contractions of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle via ultrasound imaging (USI) during lifting and reaching tasks typical of everyday or work-related activities.

Design

Methodologic survey that measured inter- and intrarater reliability.

Setting

University laboratory.

Participants

A subset of 54 cine-loop images that were randomly selected from 6 randomly selected asymptomatic adults from a larger study that consisted of a sample of convenience of 20 asymptomatic adults, with a mean (SD) age of 18.8 ± 2.5 years and mean (SD) body mass index of 25.5 ± 3.5 kg/m2.

Main Outcome Measures

Thickness changes in the TrA muscle at rest and during contraction while performing 5 functional, loaded tasks. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to estimate reliability. ICC model 2,1 was used for all reliability analyses on 3 TrA muscle measures: minimum thickness, maximum thickness, and percentage change in muscle thickness. Percentage thickness change of TrA muscle was calculated as ([thicknessmax − thicknessmin]/thicknessmin) × 100.

Results

Two clinicians both scored 9 trials of 6 randomly selected participants (54 cine loops). Rater 1 scored these images again 28 days later. All image information (participant, trial, task, and testing session) was masked. Interrater ICC (2,1) for TrA muscle measures were moderate (0.71 rested state, 0.83 contracted state, 0.81 percentage change of muscle thickness); and high for intrarater ICC (2,1) (0.97 rested state, 0.99 contracted state, and 0.95% change in muscle thickness).

Conclusion

This study provides data for ensuring acceptable reliability of USI measures of TrA muscle thickness and thickness changes taken during loaded and functional activities. This study is the first to examine interrater and intrarater reliability of recorded cine loop images of asymptomatic adults in upright positions on 3 measures of TrA muscle activation (minimum, maximum, and percent change in muscle thickness). Reliable USI measures of TrA muscle thickness changes meet the ongoing need for clinicians' knowledge of proper and sufficiently adequate muscle activation in the clinical setting to assist progression of lumbar stabilization exercises.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.