An empirical study of the impact of e-business technologies on organizational collaboration and performance
Corresponding Author
Nada R. Sanders
Information Systems and Operations Management, Raj Soin College of Business, 271 Rike Hall, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, United States
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nada R. Sanders
Information Systems and Operations Management, Raj Soin College of Business, 271 Rike Hall, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, United States
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The use of e-business technologies between supply chain organizations has been thematic in recent literature. Organizational collaboration, the foundation of supply chain management, has been enabled by the development and use of e-business technologies. Organizational collaboration and information sharing, in turn, are expected to improve organizational performance. We propose and test a model of the relationship between organizational use of e-business technologies, organizational collaboration, and performance, using empirical data. Our model differs from past studies in that collaboration is viewed as two unique constructs, differentiating between intra- and inter-organizational collaboration. Our findings show that use of e-business technologies impacts performance both directly and indirectly by promoting both measures of collaboration. Intra-firm collaboration is also found to have a direct impact on organizational performance. However, the impact of inter-organizational collaboration on performance is found to be only indirect, through the impact of intra-organizational collaboration. These findings reveal the complexity of organizational collaboration, underscore the importance for companies to promote internal collaboration, and invest in information technologies that facilitate it.
References
- J.C. Anderson, D.W. Gerbing. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin. 1988; 103(3): 411–423.
- M.F. Anderson, P.B. Katz. Strategic sourcing. International Journal of Logistics Management. 1998; 9(1): 1–13.
10.1108/09574099810805708 Google Scholar
- J.C. Andraski. Leadership and the realization of supply chain collaboration. Journal of Business Logistics. 1998; 19(2): 9–11.
- J.S. Armstrong, T.S. Overton. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research. 1977; 14(3): 396–402.
10.2307/3150783 Google Scholar
- R.P. Bagozzi, Y. Yi. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science. 1998; 6(1): 74–93.
- J. Bailey, P.E. Rabinovich. In Internet retailers’ dilemma of operational and market efficiencies. R. Ganeshan, T. Boone, eds. New Directions in Supply Chain Management: Technology, Strategy, and Implementation. New York: AMACOM. 2001, 39–57.
- J.Y. Bakos. Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science. 1997; 43(12): 1676–1692.
- H. Barki, S. Rivard, J. Talbot. A keyword classification scheme for IS research literature: an update. MIS Quarterly. 1993; 17(1): 209–226.
10.2307/249802 Google Scholar
- P.M. Bentler. EQS: Structural Equation Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.. 1997.
- W.C. Benton, M. Maloni. The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management. 2005; 23(1): 1–22.
- A.S. Bharadwaj. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly. 2000; 24(1): 169–196.
10.2307/3250983 Google Scholar
- A.S. Bharadwaj, S.G. Bharadwaj, B.R. Konsynski. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Science. 1999; 45(7): 1008–1024.
10.1287/mnsc.45.7.1008 Google Scholar
- D.J. Bowersox, D.J. Closs, T.P. Stank. Ten mega-trends that will revolutionize supply chain logistics. Journal of Business Logistics. 2000; 21(2): 1–16.
- E. Brynjolfsson, L. Hitt. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science. 1996; 42(4): 541–558.
- E. Brynjolfsson, M.D. Smith. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science. 2000; 46(4): 563–585.
- E. Buffa. Meeting the Competitive Challenge. Homewood, IL: Irwin Publishing. 1984.
- T. Byrd, D. Turner. An exploratory analysis of the value of the skills of IT personnel: their relationship to IS infrastructure and competitive advantage. Decision Sciences. 2001; 32(1): 21–54.
10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00952.x Google Scholar
- B.M. Byrne. Structural Equation Models with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 1994.
- R.B. Chase, R.B. Jacobs, N.J. Aquilano. Operations Management for Competitive Advantage. 11th ed.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin. 2006.
- T. Choi, J. Hartley. An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management. 1996; 14(4): 333–343.
10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00091-5 Google Scholar
- E. Clemons, M.C. Row. Information technology and industrial cooperation: the changing economics of coordination and ownership. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1992; 9(2): 9–28.
10.1080/07421222.1992.11517956 Google Scholar
- E. Clemons, S. Reddi, M. Row. The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: the ‘move to the middle’ hypothesis. Journal of Management Information System. 1993; 10(2): 9–35.
10.1080/07421222.1993.11517998 Google Scholar
- S. Chopra, D. Dougan, G. Taylor. B2B e-commerce opportunities. Supply Chain Management Review. 2001; 5(3): 50–58.
- R.H. Coase. The nature of the firm. Economica. 1937; 4(3): 386–405.
10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x Google Scholar
- Compass Group. The Compass World IT Strategy Census 1998–2000. Rotterdam: Compass Publishing. 1998.
- T.H. Davenport. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 1993.
- S. Deveraj, R. Kohli. Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2000; 16(4): 41–76.
10.1080/07421222.2000.11518265 Google Scholar
- R.F. DeVellis. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 1991.
- D.R. Dillman. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 2000.
- B. Dos Santos, L. Sussman. Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity Paradox. International Journal of Information Management. 2000; 20(6): 429–440.
10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00037-2 Google Scholar
- M.J. Earl. Experiences in strategic information systems planning: editor's comments. MIS Quarterly. 1993; 17(1): 5.
- D. Feeny. Making business sense of the e-opportunity. Sloan Management Review. 2001; 45–51
- J.W. Forrester. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1961.
- M.T. Frohlich. e-Integration in the supply chain: barriers performance. Decision Sciences. 2002; 33(4): 537–556.
10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01655.x Google Scholar
- M.T. Frohlich, R. Westbrook. Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management. 2001; 19(2): 185–200.
- J. Gilbert. Resellers, click here. Sales and Marketing Management. 2002; 154(9): 25.
- V. Grover, M. Malhotra. Business process reengineering: a tutorial on the concept, evolution, method, technology, and application. Journal of Operations Management. 1997; 15(3): 193–213.
10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00104-0 Google Scholar
- K. Gutman. How GM is accelerating vehicle deployment. Supply Chain Management Review. 2003; 7(3): 34–39.
- T.R. Hammel, L.R. Kopczak. Tightening the supply chain. Production and Inventory Management Journal. 1993; 63–70
- M. Hammer, G.E. Mangurian. The changing value of communications technology. Sloan Management Review. 1987; 28(2): 65–71.
- R.B. Handfield, E.L. NicholsJr.. Introduction to Supply Chain Management, Prentice-Hall. 1999.
- R.H. Hayes, S.C. Wheelwright. Restoring our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1984.
- T. Hill. Manufacturing Strategy: Text and Cases. 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill. 2000.
10.1007/978-1-349-14018-3 Google Scholar
- P. Hines, N. Rich, J. Bicheno, D. Brunt, D. Taylor, C. Butterworth, J. Sullivan. Value stream management. International Journal of Logistics Management. 1998; 9(1): 24–42.
- L.M. Hitt, E. Brynjolfsson. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly. 1996; 1(2): 121–141.
10.2307/249475 Google Scholar
- Q. Hu, R.T. Plant. An empirical study of the causal relationship between IT investment and firm performance. Information Resources Management Journal. 2001; 14(3): 15–26.
10.4018/irmj.2001070102 Google Scholar
- L. Hu, P.M. Bentler. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999; 6(1): 1–55.
- B. Ives, S. Jarvenpaa. Applications of global information technology: key issues for management. MIS Quarterly. 1991; 15(2): 33–49.
10.2307/249433 Google Scholar
- J.L. Johnson. Strategic integration in distribution channels: managing the interfirm relationship as a strategic asset. Academy of Marketing Science Journal. 1999; 27(1): 4–18.
- K.B. Kahn, J.T. Mentzer. Logistics and interdepartmental integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 1996; 26(8): 6–14.
10.1108/09600039610182753 Google Scholar
- R. Kathuria, M. Anandarajan, M. Igbaria. Linking IT applications with manufacturing strategy: an intelligent decision support system approach. Decision Sciences. 1999; 30(4): 959–992.
10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00915.x Google Scholar
- G.S. Kearns, A.L. Lederer. A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: how knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage. Decision Sciences. 2003; 34(1): 1–29.
10.1111/1540-5915.02289 Google Scholar
- K.E. Kendall. The significance of information systems research on emerging technologies: seven information technologies that promise to improve managerial effectiveness. Decision Sciences. 1997; 28(4): 775–792.
- J.L. Kent, J.T. Mentzer. The effect of investment in interorganizational information technology in a retail supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics. 2003; 24(2): 155–176.
10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00050.x Google Scholar
- H.L. Lee. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review. 2004; 82(10): 102–112.
- H.L. Lee, C. Billington. Managing supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management Review. 1992; (Spring): 65–73.
- H.L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, S. Whang. Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Science. 1997; 43(4): 546–558.
10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546 Google Scholar
- R.R. Lummus, R.J. Vokurka, K.L. Albert. Strategic supply chain planning. Production and Inventory Management Journal. 1998; 39(3): 49–58.
- J.H. Lim, V.J. Richardson, T.L. Roberts. Information technology investment and firm performance: a meta-analysis. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 2004; 1–11
- V.A. Mabert, M.A. Venkataramanan. Special research focus on supply chain linkages: challenges for design and management in the 21st century. Decision Sciences. 1998; 29(3): 537–552.
- A. McAfee. The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: an empirical investigation. Production and Operations Management. 2002; 11(1): 33–53.
10.1111/j.1937-5956.2002.tb00183.x Google Scholar
- R. Metters. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management. 1997; 15: 89–110.
10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00098-8 Google Scholar
- J. Mohr, J. Nevin. Communication strategies in marketing channels: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing. 1990; 50: 36–51.
10.1177/002224299005400404 Google Scholar
- R. Monczka, K. Petersen, R. Handfield, G. Ragatz. Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective. Decision Sciences. 1998; 29(3): 553–578.
- R. Narasimhan, A. Das. An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing on manufacturing flexibility and performance. Decision Sciences. 1999; 30(3): 683–713.
10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00903.x Google Scholar
- R. Narasimhan, A. Das. The impact of purchasing integration and practices on manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management. 2001; 19(1): 593–609.
10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00055-9 Google Scholar
- R. Narasimhan, J. Jayaram. Casual linkages in supply chain management: an exploratory study of North American manufacturing firms. Decision Sciences. 1998; 29(3): 579–606.
10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01355.x Google Scholar
- R. Narasimhan, S.W. Kim. Information system utilization strategy for supply chain integration. Journal of Business Logistics. 2001; 22(2): 51–75.
10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00003.x Google Scholar
- B. Nooteboom. Information technology, transaction costs and the decision to ‘make or buy’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1992; 4(4): 339–350.
10.1080/09537329208524105 Google Scholar
- L.W. Phillips. Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: a methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981; 18(1): 395–415.
10.1177/002224378101800401 Google Scholar
- M. Porter. Competitive Strategy. New York, NY: Free Press. 1980.
- M. Porter. Competitive Advantage. New York, NY: Free Press. 1985.
- C. Prahinski, W.C. Benton. Supplier evaluations: communication strategies to improve supplier performance. Journal of Operations Management. 2004; 22(1): 39–62.
- E. Rabinovich, J.P. Bailey, C.R. Carter. A transaction-efficiency analysis of an Internet retailing supply chain in the music CD industry. Decision Sciences. 2003; 34(1): 131–172.
10.1111/1540-5915.02276 Google Scholar
- S. Raghunathan. Interorganizational collaborative forecasting and replenishment systems and supply chain implications. Decision Sciences. 1999; 30(4): 1053–1072.
10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00918.x Google Scholar
- A. Rai, R. Patnayakuni, N. Patnayakuni. Refocusing where and how IT value is realized: an empirical investigation. Omega. 1996; 24(4): 399–412.
10.1016/0305-0483(96)00009-6 Google Scholar
- A. Roth, J.G. Miller. In Manufacturing strategy, manufacturing strength, managerial success and economic outcomes. J.E. Ettlie, M.C. Burnstein, A. Feigenbaum, eds. Manufacturing Strategy: The Research Agenda for the Next Decade. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher. 1990.
- R.E. Sabath, J. Fontanella. The unfulfilled promise of supply chain collaboration. Supply Chain Management Review. 2002; 24–29
- R. Sabherwal. The relationship between information system planning sophistication and information system success: an empirical assessment. Decision Sciences. 1999; 30(1): 137–167.
10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01604.x Google Scholar
- R. Santhanam, E. Hartono. Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly. 2003; 27(1): 125–153.
10.2307/30036521 Google Scholar
- T. Scannell, V. Shawnee, C. Dröge. Upstream supply chain management and competitive performance in the automotive supply industry. Journal of Business Logistics. 2000; 2(1): 23–48.
- M. Schrage. Shared Minds: The New Technologies of Collaboration. New York: Random House. 1990.
- S. Sengupta. B2B exchanges anyone? New paths to success. Supply Chain Management Review. 2001; 5(6): 68–73.
- V. Shankar, T. O’Driscoll. How wireless networks are reshaping the supply chain. Supply Chain Management Review. 2002; 6(4): 44–51.
- S. Sircar, J.L. Turnbow, B. Bordoloi. A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2000; 16(4): 69–97.
10.1080/07421222.2000.11518266 Google Scholar
- W. Skinner. Manufacturing—missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review. 1969; 47(3): 136–145.
- V. Sriram, R. Stump. Information technology investment in purchasing: an empirical investigation of communications, relationships and performance outcomes. Omega. 2004; 32(1): 41–55.
10.1016/j.omega.2003.09.008 Google Scholar
- T.P. Stank, S.B. Keller, P.J. Daugherty. Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance. Journal of Business Logistics. 2001; 22(1): 29–47.
10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00158.x Google Scholar
- H. Steerman. A practical look at CPFR: the Sears–Michelin experience. Supply Chain Management Review. 2003; 7(4): 46–53.
- J. Stevens. Integrating the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management. 1989; 19(8): 3–8.
10.1108/EUM0000000000329 Google Scholar
- T. Stratopoulos, B. Dehning. Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox?. Information & Management. 2000; 38(2): 103–117.
10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00058-6 Google Scholar
- J.H.M. Stoeken. Information technology, innovation and supply chain structure. International Journal of Technology Management. 2000; 20(1/2): 156–175.
10.1504/IJTM.2000.002861 Google Scholar
- M. Subramani. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships?. MIS Quarterly. 2004; 28(1): 45–73.
10.2307/25148624 Google Scholar
- M. Subramani, N. Venkatraman. Safeguarding investment in asymmetric interorganizational relationships: theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal. 2003; 46(1): 46–62.
- A. Takeishi. Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: the case of automotive product development. Organizational Science. 2002; 12(3): 321–338.
10.1287/orsc.13.3.321.2779 Google Scholar
- K. Tan, V. Kannan, R. Handfield. Supply chain management supplier performance and firm performance. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. 1998; 34(3): 2–9.
- T. Teo, W. King. Integration between business planning and information systems planning: an evolutionary-contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1997; 14(1): 185–214.
10.1080/07421222.1997.11518158 Google Scholar
- A.J. Vakharia. e-Business and supply chain management. Decision Sciences. 2002; 33(4): 495–504.
10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01653.x Google Scholar
- S. Vickery, K. Calantone, R.C. Dröge. Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study. The Journal of Supply Chain Management. 1999; (Summer): 16–24.
10.1111/j.1745-493X.1999.tb00058.x Google Scholar
- S.K. Vickery, J. Jayaram, C. Dröge, R. Calantone. The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management. 2003; 21(5): 523–539.
10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.002 Google Scholar
- P. Ward, K.G. Leong, D.L. Snyder. Manufacturing strategy: an overview of current process and content models. J.E. Ettlie, M.C. Burnstein, A. Fiegenbaum Manufacturing Strategy: The Research Agenda for the Next Decade. Proceedings of the Joint Industry University Conference on Manufacturing Strategy Ann Arbor, Michigan 1990; 189–199
- H.J. Wen, D.C. Yen, B. Lin. Methods for measuring information technology investment payoff. Human Systems Management. 1998; 17(2): 145–153.
- O.E. Williamson. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press. 1975.
10.2307/2391875 Google Scholar
- J.D. Wisner. A structural equation model of supply chain management strategies and firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics. 2003; 24(1): 1–26.
10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00030.x Google Scholar
- A. Zaheer, V. McEvily, V. Perrone. The strategic value of buyer–supplier relationships. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. 1995; 3(3): 20–26.