Social–psychological profiles of identity styles: attitudinal and social-cognitive correlates in late adolescence
Corresponding Author
Bart Soenens
Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
B. Soenens is a Research Assistant at the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO).
Corresponding author. Tel.: +32-16325962.Search for more papers by this authorBart Duriez
Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Search for more papers by this authorLuc Goossens
Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Bart Soenens
Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
B. Soenens is a Research Assistant at the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO).
Corresponding author. Tel.: +32-16325962.Search for more papers by this authorBart Duriez
Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Search for more papers by this authorLuc Goossens
Department of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This study examined the relationships between three identity styles (i.e. the information style, the normative style, and the diffuse/avoidant style) and a number of social-cognitive and attitudinal variables (including empathy, prejudice, and conservatism). Discriminant analysis on a sample of late adolescents (N=393) led to the conclusion that two classes of variables differentiate between the three identity styles. Maladaptive coping strategies and, to a lesser extent, low empathy distinguished mainly between the information style and the normative style on the one hand and the diffuse/avoidant style on the other hand. Need for closure and measures of prejudice and conservatism differentiated primarily between the normative style and the two other styles. These two classes of variables can be related to two basic dimensions in current theory on adolescents’ identity styles, that is, active vs. superficial processing of information and adherence to traditional opinions vs. openmindedness.
References
- G.R. Adams, J.H. Ryan, J.J. Hoffman, W.R. Dobson, E.C. Nielson. Ego identity status, conformity behavior, and personality in late adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985; 47: 1091–1104.
- T.W. Adorno, E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D.J. Levinson, R.N. Sanford. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper. 1950.
- B. Altemeyer. Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press. 1981.
- B. Altemeyer, M.P. Zanna. The other “authoritarian personality”. In Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 1998, 47–92 Vol. 30.
- Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, Whole No. 416.
- A.M. Berman, S.J. Schwartz, W.M. Kurtines, S.L. Berman. The process of exploration in identity formation. the role of style and competence Journal of Adolescence. 2001; 24: 513–528.
- M.D. Berzonsky. Identity style. conceptualization and measurement Journal of Adolescent Research. 1989; 4: 268–282.
10.1177/074355488943002 Google Scholar
- M.D. Berzonsky. Self-construction over the life-span. a process perspective on identity formation Advances in Personal Construct Psychology. 1990; 1: 155–186.
- M.D. Berzonsky. Identity style inventory (ISI3): revised version. In Unpublished measure. Cortland, NY: State University of New York. 1992a.
- M.D. Berzonsky, G.R. Adams, T.P. Gullotta, R. Montemayor. A process perspective on identity and stress management. In Adolescent identity formation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1992, 193–215.
- M.D. Berzonsky. Identity style and coping strategies. Journal of Personality. 1992; 60: 771–788.
- M.D. Berzonsky. Self-identity. the relationships between process and content Journal of Research in Personality. 1994; 28: 453–460.
- M.D. Berzonsky. Identity styles and hypothesis-testing strategies. Journal of Social Psychology. 1999; 139: 784–789.
- Berzonsky, M. D. (2002). Identity processing styles, self construction, and personal epistemic assumptions: a social-cognitive perspective. Paper presented at the workshop “Social cognition in adolescence: its developmental significance”, Groningen, The Netherlands, June 28–30, 2002.
- M.D. Berzonsky, G.R. Adams. Reevaluating the identity status paradigm. still useful after 35 years Developmental Review. 1999; 19: 557–590.
- M.D. Berzonsky, J.R. Ferrari. Identity orientation and decisional strategies. Personality and Individual Differences. 1996; 20: 597–606.
- M.D. Berzonsky, L.S. Kuk. Identity status, identity processing style, and the transition to university. Journal of Adolescent Research. 2000; 15: 81–98.
- M.D. Berzonsky, G.J. Niemeyer. Ego identity status and identity processing orientation. the moderating role of commitment Journal of Research in Personality. 1994; 28: 425–435.
- M.D. Berzonsky, J. Nurmi, A. Kinney, K. Tammi. Identity processing style and cognitive attributional strategies. similarities and difference across different contexts European Journal of Personality. 1999; 13: 105–120.
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199903/04)13:2<105::AID-PER325>3.0.CO;2-H Google Scholar
- M.D. Berzonsky, C. Sullivan. Social-cognitive aspects of identity style. need for cognition, experiential openness, and introspection Journal of Adolescent Research. 1992; 7: 140–155.
10.1177/074355489272002 Google Scholar
- J. Billiet, H. De Witte. Naar racisme neigende houdingen in Vlaanderen. typologie en maatschappelijke achtergronden [Attitudes tending towards racism in Flanders: typology and societal background] Cultuur en Migratie. 1991; 1: 25–62.
- H.A. Bosma, E.S. Kunnen. Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development. a review and synthesis Developmental Review. 2001; 21: 39–66.
- R.B. Cattell. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1966; 1: 140–161.
- J.E. Côté, C. Levine. A critical examination of the ego identity status paradigm. Developmental Review. 1988; 8: 147–184.
- P. Cramer. Identity, narcissism, and defense mechanisms in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality. 1995; 29: 341–361.
- Cratylus. Need for closure (Dutch version). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Free University of Amsterdam, Department of Social Psychology. 1996.
- M.H. Davis. Measuring individual differences in empathy. evidence for a multidimensional approach Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983; 44: 113–126.
- H. De Witte. Conformisme, radicalisme en machteloosheid. In een onderzoek naar de sociaal-culturele en sociaal-economische opvattingen van arbeiders in Vlaanderen [Conformism, radicalism and powerlesness: in search of socio-cultural and socio-economical attitudes among workers in Flanders]. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University of Leuven, HIVA. 1990.
- S.M.C. Dollinger. Identity styles and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality. 1995; 29: 475–479.
- J. Duckitt, M.P. Zanna. A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 2001, 41–113 Vol. 33.
- J. Duckitt, C. Wagner, I. du Plessis, I. Birum. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice. testing a dual process model Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002; 83: 75–93.
- B. Duriez. Are religious people nicer people?. In Taking a closer look at the religion-empathy relationship, Mental Health, Religion & Culture (in press). in press.
- B. Duriez. A research note on the relation between religiosity and racism. the importance of the way in which religious contents are being processed The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2004; 14: 175–189.
- B. Duriez, J.R.J. Fontaine, D. Hutsebaut. A further elaboration of the Post-Critical Belief scale. evidence for the existence of four different approaches to religion in Flanders-Belgium Psychologica Belgica. 2000; 40: 153–181.
- B. Duriez, D. Hutsebaut. The relation between religion and racism. the role of post-critical beliefs Mental Health, Religion and Culture. 2000; 3 1: 85–102.
10.1080/13674670050002135 Google Scholar
- B. Duriez, P. Luyten, B. Snauwaert, D. Hutsebaut. The importance of religiosity and values in predicting political attitudes. evidence for the continuing importance of religion in Flanders (Belgium) Mental Health, Religion and Culture. 2002; 5: 35–54.
10.1080/13674670110066831 Google Scholar
- B. Duriez, B. Soenens, W. Beyers. Personality identity styles and religiosity. an integrative study among late adolescents in Flanders (Belgium) Journal of Personality. 2004; 72: 877–910.
- B. Duriez, A. Van Hiel. The march of modern fascism. a comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism Personality and Individual Differences. 2002; 32: 1199–1213.
- Duriez, B., Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (in press). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: the importance of the socio-political context and political involvement. Political Psychology, in press.
- D.M. Erlanger. Identity status and empathic response patterns. a multidimensional investigation Journal of Adolescence. 1998; 21: 323–335.
- A.S. Fulton. Identity status, religious orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1997; 26: 1–11.
- C.J. Huberty, L.L. Lowman. Discriminant analysis via statistical packages. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1997; 57: 759–784.
- J.L. Kerpelman, J.F. Pittman, L.K. Lamke. Toward a microprocess perspective on adolescent identity development. an identity control theory approach Journal of Adolescent Research. 1997; 12: 325–346.
- M.E. Kite, K. Deaux. Attitudes towards homosexuality. assessment and behavioral consequences Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1986; 7: 137–162.
- W.R. Klecka. Discriminant analysis. London: Sage. 1980.
- R.S. Lazarus, S. Folkman. Stress, coping and adaptation. New York: Springer. 1984.
- R. Lippa, S. Arad. Gender, personality, and prejudice. the display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women Journal of Research in Personality. 1999; 33: 463–493.
- J.E. Marcia. Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966; 3: 551–558.
- J.E. Marcia. Ego identity status. relationship to change in self-esteem, general maladjustment, and authoritarianism Journal of Personality. 1967; 35: 119–133.
- J.E. Marcia. Ego identity status in college women. Journal of Personality. 1970; 38: 249–263.
- J.E. Marcia, J. Adelson. Identity in adolescence. In Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley. 1980, 159–187.
- J.E. Marcia, H.A. Bosma, T.L.G. Graafsma. Identiteitsstatus in de late adolescentie beschrijving en enkele klinische implicaties [Identity status in late adolescence: description and some clinical implications]. In De ontwikkeling van identiteit in de adolescentie. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Dekker & van de Vegt. 1982, 50–64.
- McFarland, S.G. (1998). Toward a typology of prejudiced persons. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
- McFarland, S.G. (1999). Personality, values, and latent prejudice: a test of a causal model. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- McFarland, S.G. (2001). Prejudiced persons. Submitted for publication.
- McFarland, S.G., & Adelson, S. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Vancouver, Canada.
- W. Meeus, K. Hurrelman, S.F. Hamilton. Toward a psychosocial analysis of adolescent identity an evaluation of the epigenetic theory (Erikson) and the identity status model (Marcia). In Social problems and social contexts in adolescence perspectives across boundaries. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. 1996, 83–104.
- J.D. Meloen, P. Scheepers, R. Eisinga. Inventarisatie Nederlandse F-schalen 1959–1990 [Inventarisation of Dutch F-scales]. In Onderdanig en intolerant lacunes en controverses in autoritarisme-studies. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ITS. 1991, 186–222.
- C. Middendorp. Progressiveness and conservatism. In the fundamental dimensions of ideological controversy and their relationship to social class. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Mouton. 1978.
10.1515/9783110800340 Google Scholar
- S. Milgram. Dynamics of obedience. In experiments in social psychology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. 1961.
- P.R. Nail, H.C. Harton, B.P. Decker. Political orientation and modern versus aversive racism. tests of Dovidio and Gaertner' (1998) integrated model Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 84: 754–770.
- M.H. Podd. Ego-identity status and morality. Developmental Psychology. 1972; 6: 497–507.
- F. Pratto, J. Sidanius, L.M. Stallworth, B.F. Malle. Social dominance orientation. a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994; 67: 741–763.
- S.J. Schwartz, R.L. Mullis, A.S. Waterman, R.M. Dunham. Ego identity status, identity style, and personal expressiveness. an empirical investigation of three convergent constructs Journal of Adolescent Research. 2000; 15: 504–521.
- Soenens, B., Berzonsky, M.D., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., & Goossens, L. (2004). Identity styles and causality orientations: in search of the motivational underpinnings of the identity exploration process. Submitted for publication.
- J. Streitmatter. Identity status and identity style. a replication study Journal of Adolescence. 1993; 16: 211–215.
- H. Tajfel, J.C. Turner, S. Worchel, W.C. Austin. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson–Hall. 1986, 7–24.
- A. Van Hiel, B. Duriez. Een meetinstrument voor individuele verschillen in sociale dominantie oriëntatie [A scale to measure individual differences in social dominance orientation]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie. 2002; 57: 114–116.
- A. van Hoof. The identity status field re-reviewed. an update of unresolved and neglected issues with a view on some alternative approaches Developmental Review. 1999; 19: 497–556.
- A. Vingerhoets. Psychosocial stress. In an experimental approach. Life events, coping, and psychobiological functioning. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. 1985.
- A. Vingerhoets, P. Flohr. Type A behaviour and self-reports of coping preferences. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 1984; 57: 15–21.
- A.S. Waterman. Identity development from adolescence to adulthood. an extension of theory and a review of research Developmenal Psychology. 1982; 18: 341–358.
- D.M. Webster, W. Kruglanski. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994; 67: 1049–1062.
- J.M.G. Williams, F.N. Watts, C. MacLeod, A. Mathews. Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. 2nd. New York: Wiley. 1997.