Volume 14, Issue 6 pp. 539-544
Original Article

Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 levels for the evaluation of curability and resectability in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Shuichi Fujioka

Corresponding Author

Shuichi Fujioka

Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan

Department of Surgery, Jikei Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1 Izumi-honcho, Komae, Tokyo 201-8601, JapanSearch for more papers by this author
Takeyuki Misawa

Takeyuki Misawa

Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tomoyoshi Okamoto

Tomoyoshi Okamoto

Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takeshi Gocho

Takeshi Gocho

Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yasuro Futagawa

Yasuro Futagawa

Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yuichi Ishida

Yuichi Ishida

Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Katsuhiko Yanaga

Katsuhiko Yanaga

Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 November 2007
Citations: 2

Abstract

Background Purpose

Although carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) are the most studied serum tumor markers that have been evaluated for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer, little is known of the value of these markers for the prediction of curability and resectability.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA 19–9 in 244 consecutive patients with pancreatic operations.

Results

Although 159 pancreatic operations seemed “resectable”, 93 of them were judged curative (R0) and the other 66 turned out to be noncurative (R1/2). The remaining 85 failed resection because of unexpected metastasis or locally advanced disease (LD), which was unresectable compared with levels in those patients without liver metastasis or LD. CEA levels were significantly higher in patients with liver metastasis and LD, while CA 19–9 levels were correlated with liver and peritoneal metastases. When both markers were negative, curative (R0) and respectable (R0 + R1/2) operation were performed in 70% and 85% of patients, respectively. Logistic regression analysis indicated that under conditions where both CEA and CA 19-9 were negative, the odds ratios for curative and respectable operations were 4.43 and 3.58, respectively.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that combined preoperative CEA and CA 19–9 levels are suitable for assessing expected curability and resectability in patients with pancreatic cancer.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.