Volume 47, Issue 5 1 pp. 1247-1252
Original Scientific Report

High-Risk Breast Lesions Diagnosed by Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision

Ping He

Ping He

Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yu-Tao Lei

Yu-Tao Lei

Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Hong-Mei Zhao

Hong-Mei Zhao

Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Wen Chen

Wen Chen

Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Wei-Wei Shen

Wei-Wei Shen

Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Peng Fu

Peng Fu

Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191 Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Li-Gang Cui

Corresponding Author

Li-Gang Cui

Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191 Beijing, China

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 February 2023
Citations: 2

Copyright comment: Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyze the role of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (US-guided VAE) in the treatment of high-risk breast lesions and to evaluate the clinical and US features of the patients associated with recurrence or development of malignancy.

Materials and methods

Between April 2010 and September 2021, 73 lesions of 73 patients underwent US-guided VAE and were diagnosed with high-risk breast lesions. The incidence of recurrence or development of malignancy for high-risk breast lesions was evaluated at follow-up period. The clinical and US features of the patients were analyzed to identify the factors affecting the recurrence or development of malignancy rate.

Results

Only benign phyllodes tumors on US-guided VAE showed recurrences, while other high-risk breast lesions that were atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ), radial scar, and flat epithelial atypia did not show recurrences or malignant transformation. The recurrence rate of the benign phyllodes tumor was 20.8% (5/24) in a mean follow-up period of 34.3 months. The recurrence rate of benign phyllodes tumor with distance from nipple of less than 1 cm was significantly higher than that of lesions with distance from nipple of more than 1 cm (75% vs. 10%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Benign phyllodes tumors without concurrent breast cancer could be safely followed up instead of surgical excision after US-guided VAE when the lesions were classified as BI-RADS 3 or 4A by US.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.