Volume 43, Issue 4 1 pp. 981-987
Original Scientific Report

Understanding Disparities in Surgical Outcomes for Medicaid Beneficiaries

Jake Claflin

Jake Claflin

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2110 Taubman Center, 48109 Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Justin B. Dimick

Justin B. Dimick

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2110 Taubman Center, 48109 Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Darrell A. Campbell

Darrell A. Campbell

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2110 Taubman Center, 48109 Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michael J. Englesbe

Michael J. Englesbe

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2110 Taubman Center, 48109 Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kyle H. Sheetz

Corresponding Author

Kyle H. Sheetz

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2110 Taubman Center, 48109 Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Tel.: 412-759-5141, [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 December 2018
Citations: 16

Abstract

Background

Few studies have evaluated whether outcome disparities between Medicaid and private insurance beneficiaries are driven by the hospital at which the patient receives care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the hospital on surgical outcomes in Medicaid beneficiaries.

Methods

We identified 139,566 non-elderly Medicaid and private insurance beneficiaries undergoing general, vascular, or gynecological surgery between 2012 and 2017 using a statewide clinical registry in Michigan. We calculated risk-adjusted rates of complications, readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and post-acute care utilization using multivariable logistic regression, accounting for patient and procedural factors. We then evaluated whether, and to what extent, the hospital influenced outcome disparities between Medicaid and privately insured beneficiaries.

Results

Risk-adjusted rates for all outcomes were higher in Medicaid beneficiaries. For example, overall post-discharge ED visit rates were 14.3% (95% CI 13.7% to 14.9%) for Medicaid compared to 7.5% (95% CI 7.1% to 7.9%, P < 0.01) for private insurance beneficiaries. Hospital factors explained 3.9% of the observed difference in complication rates between Medicaid and private insurance beneficiaries. In contrast, hospital factors explained a greater proportion of the disparities in readmissions (30.6%), ED visits (33.0%), and post-acute care utilization (16.1%). Results were similar when restricting the study population to elective cases only.

Conclusions

Hospital factors account for a significant proportion of the disparities in post-discharge resource utilization between Medicaid and private insurance beneficiaries. Policies aiming to improve the quality and equity of surgical care for Medicaid beneficiaries should focus on the post-discharge period.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.