Quality of Life and Medico-Legal Implications Following Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injuries
Deepak Hariharan
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, NG7 2UH Nottingham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorEmmanouil Psaltis
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, NG7 2UH Nottingham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorJohn H. Scholefield
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, NG7 2UH Nottingham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dileep N. Lobo
- [email protected]
- (+44)-115-8231149
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, NG7 2UH Nottingham, UK
Tel.: (+44)-115-8231149, [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDeepak Hariharan
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, NG7 2UH Nottingham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorEmmanouil Psaltis
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, NG7 2UH Nottingham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorJohn H. Scholefield
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, NG7 2UH Nottingham, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dileep N. Lobo
- [email protected]
- (+44)-115-8231149
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, NG7 2UH Nottingham, UK
Tel.: (+44)-115-8231149, [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In this review we aimed to evaluate quality of life after bile duct injury and the consequent medico-legal implications. A comprehensive English language literature search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index and Google™ Scholar databases for articles published between January 2000 and April 2016. The last date of search was 11 April 2016. Key search words included bile duct injury, iatrogenic, cholecystectomy, prevention, risks, outcomes, quality of life, litigation and were used in combination with the Boolean operators AND, OR and NOT. Long-term survival after bile duct injury is significantly impaired (all-cause long-term mortality approximately 21 %) along with the quality of life (especially psychological/mental state remains affected). Bile duct injury is associated with high rates of litigation. Monetary compensation varied from £2500 to £216,000 in the UK, €9826–€55,301 in the Netherlands and $628,138–$2,891,421 in the USA. Bile duct injuries have profound implications for patients, medical personnel and healthcare providers as they cause significant morbidity and mortality, high rates of litigation and raised healthcare expenditure.
References
- 1KeusF, de JongJA, GooszenHG, van LaarhovenCJ Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2006) 4: CD006231
- 2LauWY, LaiEC, LauSH Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review. ANZ J Surg (2010) 80(1–2): 75–8110.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05205.x20575884
- 3TornqvistB, StrombergC, PerssonG, NilssonM Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ (2012) 345: e645710.1136/bmj.e645723060654
- 4HalbertC, AltieriMS, YangJ et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with common bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc (2016)
- 5RoyPG, SoonawallaZF, GrantHW Medicolegal costs of bile duct injuries incurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) (2009) 11(2): 130–13410.1111/j.1477-2574.2008.00023.x
- 6FlumDR, CheadleA, PrelaC, DellingerEP, ChanL Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA (2003) 290(16): 2168–217310.1001/jama.290.16.216814570952
- 7WaageA, NilssonM Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg (2006) 141(12): 1207–121310.1001/archsurg.141.12.120717178963
- 8NuzzoG, GiulianteF, GiovanniniI et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg (2005) 140(10): 986–99210.1001/archsurg.140.10.98616230550
- 9MassarwehNN, DevlinA, SymonsRG, Broeckel ElrodJA, FlumDR Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk-taking preference, and common bile duct injuries. J Am Coll Surg (2009) 209(1): 17–2410.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.06319651059
- 10HumesDJ, AhmedI, LoboDN The pedicle effect and direct coupling: delayed thermal injuries to the bile duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg (2010) 145(1): 96–9810.1001/archsurg.2009.23620083761
- 11DekkerSW, HughTB Laparoscopic bile duct injury: understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ J Surg (2008) 78(12): 1109–111410.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04761.x19087053
- 12HughTB Laparoscopic bile duct injury: some myths. ANZ J Surg (2002) 72(2): 164–16710.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02311.x12074074
- 13StrasbergSM, EagonCJ, DrebinJA The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomyߝthe danger of the false infundibulum. J Am Coll Surg (2000) 191(6): 661–66710.1016/S1072-7515(00)00717-111129816
- 14StrasbergSM, BruntLM Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg (2010) 211(1): 132–13810.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.05320610259
- 15FlumDR, DellingerEP, CheadleA, ChanL, KoepsellT Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA (2003) 289(13): 1639–164410.1001/jama.289.13.163912672731
- 16MassarwehNN, FlumDR Role of intraoperative cholangiography in avoiding bile duct injury. J Am Coll Surg (2007) 204(4): 656–66410.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.03817382226
- 17TörnqvistB, StrömbergC, AkreO, EnochssonL, NilssonM Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg (2015) 102(8): 952–95810.1002/bjs.983225919401
- 18SheffieldKM, RiallTS, HanY, KuoYF, TownsendCMJr, GoodwinJS Association between cholecystectomy with vs without intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common duct injury. JAMA (2013) 310(8): 812–82010.1001/jama.2013.27620523982367
- 19SanjayP, KulliC, PolignanoFM, TaitIS Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-wide survey in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl (2010) 92(4): 302–30610.1308/003588410X1262881245861720501016
- 20SicklickJK, CampMS, LillemoeKD et al. Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg (2005) 241(5): 786–79210.1097/01.sla.0000161029.27410.7115849514(discussion 793-795)
- 21StewartL, WayLW Laparoscopic bile duct injuries: timing of surgical repair does not influence success rate. A multivariate analysis of factors influencing surgical outcomes. HPB (Oxford) (2009) 11(6): 516–522
- 22WalshRM, HendersonJM, VogtDP, BrownN Long-term outcome of biliary reconstruction for bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery (2007) 142(4): 450–45610.1016/j.surg.2007.07.00817950335(discussion 456-457)
- 23AbdelRafeeA, El-ShobariM, AskarW, SultanAM, El NakeebA Long-term follow-up of 120 patients after hepaticojejunostomy for treatment of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg (2015) 18: 205–21010.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.00425965917
- 24BarbierL, SoucheR, SlimK, Ah-SouneP Long-term consequences of bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. J Visc Surg (2014) 151(4): 269–27910.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.05.00624954866
- 25BoermaD, RauwsEA, KeulemansYC et al. Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg (2001) 234(6): 750–75710.1097/00000658-200112000-0000611729381
- 26MeltonGB, LillemoeKD, CameronJL, SauterPA, ColemanJ, YeoCJ Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life. Ann Surg (2002) 235(6): 888–89510.1097/00000658-200206000-0001812035047
- 27MooreDE, FeurerID, HolzmanMD et al. Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life. Arch Surg (2004) 139(5): 476–48110.1001/archsurg.139.5.47615136346(discussion 481–482)
- 28SarmientoJM, FarnellMB, NagorneyDM, HodgeDO, HarringtonJR Quality-of-life assessment of surgical reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-induced bile duct injuries: what happens at 5 years and beyond?. Arch Surg (2004) 139(5): 483–48810.1001/archsurg.139.5.48315136347(discussion 488–489)
- 29HoganAM, HotiE, WinterDC et al. Quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a case control study. Ann Surg (2009) 249(2): 292–29519212184
- 30de ReuverPR, SprangersMA, RauwsEA et al. Impact of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life: a longitudinal study after multidisciplinary treatment. Endoscopy (2008) 40(8): 637–64310.1055/s-2008-107744418680076
- 31Dominguez-RosadoI, MercadoMA, KauffmanC, Ramirez-del ValF, Elnecavé-OlaizA, Zamora-ValdésD Quality of life in bile duct injury: 1-, 5-, and 10-year outcomes after surgical repair. J Gastrointest Surg (2014) 18(12): 2089–209410.1007/s11605-014-2671-525305036
- 32EjazA, SpolveratoG, KimY et al. Long-term health-related quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury repair. J Am Coll Surg (2014) 219(5): 923–932.e1010.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.04.02425127511
- 33LandmanMP, FeurerID, MooreDE, ZaydfudimV, PinsonCW The long-term effect of bile duct injuries on health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) (2013) 15(4): 252–259
- 34ChandlerJG, VoylesCR, FlooreTL, BartholomewLA Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps. J Gastroint Surg (1997) 1(2): 138–14510.1016/S1091-255X(97)80101-1(discussion 145)
- 35AlkhaffafB, DecadtB 15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Ann Surg (2010) 251(4): 682–68510.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc99fd20224377
- 36PereraMT, SilvaMA, ShahAJ et al. Risk factors for litigation following major transectional bile duct injury sustained at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg (2010) 34(11): 2635–264110.1007/s00268-010-0725-820645094
- 37de ReuverPR, WindJ, CremersJE, BuschOR, van GulikTM, GoumaDJ Litigation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evaluation of the Dutch arbitration system for medical malpractice. J Am Coll Surg (2008) 206(2): 328–33410.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.08.00418222388
- 38McLeanTR Monetary lessons from litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg (2005) 71(7): 606–61216089128
- 39 General Medical Council (2015) Guidance on duty of candour 2015. https://www.gmc-uk.org/DoC_guidance_english.pdf_61618688.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2016