Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Dysplastic Barrett’s Esophagus
Corresponding Author
Sheraz R. Markar
Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St. Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, South Wharf Road, W2 1NY London, UK
[email protected]Search for more papers by this authorGeorge Hanna
Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St. Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, South Wharf Road, W2 1NY London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sheraz R. Markar
Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St. Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, South Wharf Road, W2 1NY London, UK
[email protected]Search for more papers by this authorGeorge Hanna
Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St. Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, South Wharf Road, W2 1NY London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
A substantial portion of patients diagnosed preoperatively with high grade dysplasia (HGD) alone will have occult esophageal adenocarcinoma on analysis of the surgical specimen. Therefore, because of an increased risk of disease progression and malignancy, patients with HGD should be referred for esophagectomy promptly when endoscopic therapy has failed. The required extent of lymphadenectomy in this cohort of patients is unknown because of the variable incidence of submucosal cancer observed. Improvements in perioperative care, adoption of a minimally invasive surgical approach, and centralization of esophageal cancer services have substantially reduced the rates of mortality and morbidity associated with esophagectomy in recent years. Minimally invasive esophagectomy should be considered the treatment of choice in patients with dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus that is refractory to endoscopic therapy or those at high risk of invasive cancer.
References
- 1SimardEP, WardEM, SiegelR et al. Cancers with increasing incidence trends in the United States: 1999 through 2009. CA Cancer J Clin (2012) 62: 118–12910.3322/caac.2014122281605
- 2LagergrenJ, BergstromR, NyrenO Association between body mass and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Intern Med (1999) 130: 883–89010.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-0000310375336
- 3LagergrenJ, BergstromR, LindgrenA et al. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med (1999) 340: 825–83110.1056/NEJM19990318340110110080844
- 4KorstRJ, AltorkiNK High grade dysplasia: surveillance, mucosal ablation, or resection?. World J Surg (2003) 27: 1030–103410.1007/s00268-003-7057-x12917761
- 5ReidBJ, HaggittRC, RubinCE et al. Observer variation in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Hum Pathol (1988) 19: 166–17810.1016/S0046-8177(88)80344-73343032
- 6RastogiA, PuliS, El-SeragHB et al. Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc (2008) 67: 394–39810.1016/j.gie.2007.07.01918045592
- 7Downs-KellyE, MendelinJE, BennettAE et al. Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett’s esophagus biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol (2008) 103: 2333–234010.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02020.x18671819
- 8BennettC, VakilN, BergmanJ et al. Consensus statements for management of Barrett’s dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process. Gastroenterology (2012) 143: 336–34610.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.03222537613
- 9OverholtBF, LightdaleCJ, WangKK et al. Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial. Gastrointest Endosc (2005) 62: 488–49810.1016/j.gie.2005.06.04716185958
- 10ShaheenNH, SharmaP, OverholtBF et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med (2009) 360: 2277–228810.1056/NEJMoa080814519474425
- 11WuJ, PanYM, WangTT et al. Endotherapy versus surgery for early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc (2014) 79: 233–24110.1016/j.gie.2013.08.00524079410
- 12VargheseTKJr, WoodDE, FarjahF et al. Variation in esophagectomy outcomes in hospitals meeting Leapfrog volume outcome standards. Ann Thorac Surg (2011) 91: 1003–100910.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.00621440116
- 13FinksJF, OsbourneNH, BirkmeyerJD Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med (2011) 364: 2128–213710.1056/NEJMsa101070521631325
- 14BriezN, PiessenG, TorresF et al. Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Surg (2012) 99: 1547–155310.1002/bjs.893123027071
- 15BiereSS, van Berge HenegouwenMI, MaasKW et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2012) 379: 1887–189210.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-922552194
- 16AnconaE, RampadoS, CassaroM et al. Prediction of lymph node status is superficial esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol (2008) 15: 3278–328810.1245/s10434-008-0065-118726651
- 17LorenzD, OrigerJ, PauthnerM et al. Prognostic risk factors of early esophageal adenocarcinomas. Ann Surg (2014) 259: 469–47610.1097/SLA.000000000000021724096754
- 18LeersJM, DeMeesterSR, OezcelikA et al. The prevalence of lymph node metastases in patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma a retrospective review of esophagectomy specimens. Ann Surg (2011) 253: 271–27810.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fbad4221119508
- 19LiuL, HofstetterW, RashidA et al. Significance of the depth of tumor invasion in early (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol (2005) 29: 1079–108516006804
- 20BergergonEJ, LinJ, ChangAC et al. Endoscopic ultrasound is inadequate to determine which T1/T2 esophageal tumors are candidates for endoluminal therapies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2014) 147: 765–77310.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.003
- 21KondaVJ, RossAS, FergusonMK et al. Is the risk of concomitant invasive esophageal cancer in high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus overestimated?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2008) 6: 159–16410.1016/j.cgh.2007.09.01318096439
- 22ButtarNS, WangKK, SeboTJ et al. Extent of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus correlates with risk of adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology (2001) 120: 1630–163910.1053/gast.2001.2511111375945
- 23KondaVJ, FergusonMK Esophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: when and how?. World J Gastroenterol (2010) 16: 3786–379210.3748/wjg.v16.i30.378620698041
- 24HuntBM, LouieBE, DunstCM et al. Esophagectomy for failed endoscopic therapy in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus (2014) 27: 362–36710.1111/dote.1209623795720
- 25HulscherJB, TijssenJG, ObertopH et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg (2001) 72: 306–31310.1016/S0003-4975(00)02570-411465217
- 26ChangAC, JiH, BirkmeyerNJ et al. Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg (2008) 85: 424–42910.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.00718222237
- 27DarMS, GoldblumJR, RiceTW et al. Can extent of high grade dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus predict the presence of adenocarcinoma in oesophagectomy?. Gut (2003) 52: 486–48910.1136/gut.52.4.48612631655
- 28FernandoHC, LuketichJD, BuenaventuraPO et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (2002) 22: 1–610.1016/S1010-7940(02)00173-212103364
- 29KarivR, PlesecTP, GoldblumJR et al. The Seattle protocol does not more reliably predict the detection of cancer at the time of esophagectomy than a less intensive surveillance protocol. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2009) 7: 653–65810.1016/j.cgh.2008.11.02419264576
- 30MirnezamiR, RohatgiA, SutcliffeRP et al. Transhiatal oesophagectomy: treatment of choice for high-grade dysplasia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (2009) 36: 364–36710.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.04219464917
- 31PrasadGA, ButtarNS, WongkeesongLM et al. Significance of neoplastic involvement of margins obtained by endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol (2007) 102: 2380–238610.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01419.x17640326
- 32RomagnoliR, CollardJM, GutschowC et al. Outcomes of dysplasia arising in Barrett’s esophagus: a dynamic view. J Am Coll Surg (2003) 197: 365–37110.1016/S1072-7515(03)00417-412946790
- 33ReedMR, TolisGJr, EdilBH et al. Surgical treatment of esophageal high-grade dysplasia. Ann Thorac Surg (2005) 79: 1110–111510.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.09.00615797034
- 34RiceTW, BlackstoneEH, GoldblumJR et al. Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc (2001) 122: 1077–109010.1067/mtc.2001.113749
- 35SujendranV, SicaG, WarrenB et al. Oesophagectomy remains the gold standard for treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (2005) 28: 763–76610.1016/j.ejcts.2005.08.01816188449
- 36ThomsonBN, CadeRJ Oesophagectomy for early adenocarcinoma and dysplasia arising in Barrett’s oesophagus. ANZ J Surg (2003) 73: 121–12410.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02646.x12608973
- 37TsengEE, WuTT, YeoCJ et al. Barrett’s esophagus with high grade dysplasia: surgical results and long-term outcome–an update. J Gastrointest Surg (2003) 7: 164–17110.1016/S1091-255X(02)00153-112600440
- 38WangVS, HornickJL, SepulvedaJA et al. Low prevalence of submucosal invasive carcinoma at esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: a 20-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc (2009) 69: 777–78310.1016/j.gie.2008.05.01319136106
- 39WaxmanI, RajuGS, CritchlowJ et al. High-frequency probe ultrasonography has limited accuracy for detecting invasive adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma: a case series. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 101: 1773–177910.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00617.x16780561
- 40WilliamsVA, WatsonTJ, HerbellaFA et al. Esophagectomy for high grade dysplasia is safe, curative and results in good alimentary outcome. J Gastrointest Surg (2007) 11: 1589–159710.1007/s11605-007-0330-917909921
- 41ZaninottoG, ParentiAR, RuolA et al. Oesophageal resection for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Br J Surg (2000) 87: 1102–110510.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01470.x10931058
- 42HolscherAH, BollscweillerE Frequency of lymph node metastasis in submucosal esophageal cancer (letter). Ann Surg (2014) 259: e8410.1097/SLA.000000000000029824169170
- 43MamidannaR, BottleA, AylinP et al. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg (2012) 255: 197–20310.1097/SLA.0b013e31823e39fa22173202
- 44 National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (2013) http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/media/docs/press_releases/national-oesophago-gastric-cancer-audit-2013
- 45FinksJF, OsbourneNH, BirkmeyerJD Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med (2011) 364: 2128–213710.1056/NEJMsa101070521631325
- 46MarkarSR, KarthikesalingamA, ThrumurthyS et al. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011. J Gastrointest Surg (2012) 16: 1055–106310.1007/s11605-011-1731-322089950
- 47NguyenNT, SchauerP, LuketichJD Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Surgery (2000) 127: 284–29010.1067/msy.2000.10348910715983
- 48PerryKA, EnestvedtCK, PhamT et al. Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma. Arch Surg (2009) 144: 679–68410.1001/archsurg.2009.11319620549
- 49BoshierPR, AndersonO, HannaGB Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg (2011) 254: 894–90610.1097/SLA.0b013e318226378121785341
- 50JacobsM, MacefieldRC, ElbersRG et al. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res (2013) 23: 1097–111510.1007/s11136-013-0545-z24129668
- 51SundaramA, GeronimoJC, WillerBL et al. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc (2012) 26: 168–17610.1007/s00464-011-1850-721853394
- 52ParameswaranR, BlazebyJM, HughesR et al. Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg (2010) 97: 525–53110.1002/bjs.690820155792