Volume 36, Issue 11 1 pp. 2692-2698
Article

High Risk of Biliary Fistula After Isolated Segment VIII Liver Resection

Safi Dokmak

Safi Dokmak

Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Julie Agostini

Julie Agostini

Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Alexandre Jacquin

Alexandre Jacquin

Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
François Cauchy

François Cauchy

Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Olivier Farges

Olivier Farges

Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jacques Belghiti

Corresponding Author

Jacques Belghiti

Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France

Tel.: +33 1 40 87 58 95, Fax: +33 1 40 87 17 24, [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 August 2012
Citations: 9

Abstract

Background

For tumors deeply located in segment VIII (S8), right hepatectomy (RH) often is thought to solve the issue of technical accessibility. Yet, the common existence of an associated underlying diseased liver raises the question of parenchymal-sparing resection.

Methods

From 2002 to 2011, 34 patients underwent isolated S8 resection, and their operative and postoperative characteristics were compared to 34 matched patients who underwent RH for lesions located in S8.

Results

Indications and preoperative characteristics were comparable between the two groups except for larger tumors in RH patients compared with S8 patients (48 vs. 40 mm; p = 0.001). Achieving S8 resection required significantly longer clamping time (45 vs. 37 min, p = 0.011), more additional biliostasis because of obvious biliary leak (65 vs. 18 %, p < 0.001), and subsequently increased application of sealant material (56 vs. 9 %, p < 0.001) compared with RH. The overall complication rate was similar between the two groups (59 vs. 62 %, p = 0.804), although a trend toward a higher rate of biliary fistula was observed in S8 patients (20 vs. 6 %, p = 0.07). Routine CT scan performed on postoperative day 7 found significantly more subphrenic collections in S8 patients compared with RH patients (53 vs. 9 %, p = 0.003). On pathological examination, surgical margin width was comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions

Anatomical S8 resection remains a technically demanding procedure with an elevated risk of postoperative biliary fistula but allows achieving adequate carcinologic resection. Increasing consideration for parenchymal sparing resection should lead to favor this approach as a treatment of choice for small and medium-sized tumors located in this segment.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.