Volume 36, Issue 3 1 pp. 497-510
Article

Surgical Strategies for Management of the Open Abdomen

Justin L. Regner

Justin L. Regner

Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Leslie Kobayashi

Leslie Kobayashi

Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Raul Coimbra

Corresponding Author

Raul Coimbra

Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 August 2011
Citations: 115

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s the surgical community has seen a surge in the prevalence of open abdomens (OAs) reported in the surgical literature and in clinical practice. The OA has proven to be effective in decreasing mortality and immediate postoperative complications; however, it may come at the cost of delayed morbidity and the need for further surgical procedures. Indications for leaving the abdomen open have broadened to include damage control surgery, abdominal compartment syndrome, and abdominal sepsis. The surgical options for management of the OA are now more diverse and sophisticated, but there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials demonstrating the superiority of any particular method. Additionally, critical care strategies for optimization of the patient with an OA are still being developed. Review of the literature suggests a bimodal distribution of primary closure rates, with early closure dependent on postoperative intensive care management and delayed closure more affected by the choice of the temporary abdominal closure technique. Invariably, a small fraction of patients requiring OA management fail to have primary fascial closure and require some form of biologic fascial bridge with delayed ventral hernia repair in the future.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.