Surgical Strategies for Management of the Open Abdomen
Justin L. Regner
Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorLeslie Kobayashi
Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Raul Coimbra
Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA
[email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJustin L. Regner
Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorLeslie Kobayashi
Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Raul Coimbra
Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8896, 92103-8896 San Diego, CA, USA
[email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Since the mid-1990s the surgical community has seen a surge in the prevalence of open abdomens (OAs) reported in the surgical literature and in clinical practice. The OA has proven to be effective in decreasing mortality and immediate postoperative complications; however, it may come at the cost of delayed morbidity and the need for further surgical procedures. Indications for leaving the abdomen open have broadened to include damage control surgery, abdominal compartment syndrome, and abdominal sepsis. The surgical options for management of the OA are now more diverse and sophisticated, but there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials demonstrating the superiority of any particular method. Additionally, critical care strategies for optimization of the patient with an OA are still being developed. Review of the literature suggests a bimodal distribution of primary closure rates, with early closure dependent on postoperative intensive care management and delayed closure more affected by the choice of the temporary abdominal closure technique. Invariably, a small fraction of patients requiring OA management fail to have primary fascial closure and require some form of biologic fascial bridge with delayed ventral hernia repair in the future.
References
- 1StoneHH, StromPR, MullinsRJ Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg (1983) 197: 532–535684727210.1097/00000658-198305000-00005
- 2RotondoMF, SchwabCW, McGonigalMD et al. ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma (1993) 35: 375–382837129510.1097/00005373-199309000-00008
- 3RaeburnCD, MooreEE, BifflWL et al. The abdominal compartment syndrome is a morbid complication of postinjury damage control surgery. Am J Surg (2001) 182: 542–5461183931410.1016/S0002-9610(01)00821-2
- 4IvaturyRR, PorterJM, SimonRJ et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension after life-threatening penetrating abdominal trauma: prophylaxis, incidence, and clinical relevance to gastric mucosal pH and abdominal compartment syndrome. J Trauma (1998) 44: 1016–1021963715710.1097/00005373-199806000-00014
- 5OffnerPJ, de SouzaAL, MooreEE et al. Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in damage-control laparotomy after trauma. Arch Surg (2001) 136: 676–6811138700710.1001/archsurg.136.6.676
- 6NicholasJM, RixEP, EasleyKA et al. Changing patterns in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: the more things change, the more they stay the same. J Trauma (2003) 55: 1095–11081467665710.1097/01.TA.0000101067.52018.42
- 7AsensioJA, PetroneP, RoldanG et al. Has evolution in awareness of guidelines for institution of damage control improved outcome in the management of the posttraumatic open abdomen?. Arch Surg (2004) 139: 209–2141476958210.1001/archsurg.139.2.209
- 8BaloghZ, McKinleyBA, CocanourCS et al. Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome is an elusive early complication of traumatic shock resuscitation. Am J Surg (2002) 184: 538–5431248816010.1016/S0002-9610(02)01050-4
- 9BaloghZ, McKinleyBA, HolcombJB et al. Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome can be predicted early and are harbingers of multiple organ failure. J Trauma (2003) 54: 848–8591277789810.1097/01.TA.0000070166.29649.F3
- 10De WaeleJJ, HosteE, BlotSI et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Crit Care (2005) 9: R452–R4571613736010.1186/cc3754
- 11CheathamML, SafcsakK Is the evolving management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome improving survival?. Crit Care Med (2010) 38: 402–4072009506710.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b9e9b1
- 12Garcia-SabridoJL, TalladoJM, ChristouNV et al. Treatment of severe intra-abdominal sepsis and/or necrotic foci by an ‘open-abdomen’ approach: zipper and zipper-mesh techniques. Arch Surg (1988) 123: 152–156327758210.1001/archsurg.1988.01400260032002
- 13IvaturyRR, NallathambiM, RaoPM et al. Open management of the septic abdomen: therapeutic and prognostic considerations based on APACHE II. Crit Care Med (1989) 17: 511–517272120910.1097/00003246-198906000-00005
- 14TsiotosGG, Luque-de LeonE, SoreideJA et al. Management of necrotizing pancreatitis by repeated operative necrosectomy using a zipper technique. Am J Surg (1998) 175: 91–98951552210.1016/S0002-9610(97)00277-8
- 15OzgucH, YilmazlarT, GurlulerE et al. Staged abdominal repair in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection: analysis of 102 patients. J Gastrointest Surg (2003) 7: 646–6511285067810.1016/S1091-255X(02)00051-3
- 16AdkinsAL, RobbinsJ, VillalbaM et al. Open abdomen management of intra-abdominal sepsis. Am Surg (2004) 70: 137–14015011916
- 17RadenkovicDV, BajecDD, TsiotosGG et al. Planned staged reoperative necrosectomy using an abdominal zipper in the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. Surg Today (2005) 35: 833–8401617546410.1007/s00595-005-3045-0
- 18BesselinkMG, de BruijnMT, RuttenJP et al. Surgical intervention in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg (2006) 93: 593–5991652117310.1002/bjs.5287
- 19OelschlagerBK, BoyleEMJr, JohansenK et al. Delayed abdominal closure in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Am J Surg (1997) 173: 411–415916807810.1016/S0002-9610(97)00081-0
- 20RasmussenTE, HallettJWJr, NoelAA et al. Early abdominal closure with mesh reduces multiple organ failure after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: guidelines from a 10-year case-control study. J Vasc Surg (2002) 35: 246–2531185472110.1067/mva.2002.120384
- 21DjavaniK, WanhainenA, BjorckM Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome following surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2006) 31: 581–5841645854710.1016/j.ejvs.2005.12.007
- 22 Open Abdomen Advisory PanelCampbellA, ChangM, FabianT et al. Management of the open abdomen: from initial operation to definitive closure. Am Surg (2009) 75: S1–S2219998714
- 23BarkerDE, GreenJM, MaxwellRA et al. Experience with vacuum-pack temporary abdominal wound closure in 258 trauma and general and vascular surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg (2007) 204: 784–7921748148410.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.039
- 24AydinC, AytekinFO, YeniseyC et al. The effect of different temporary abdominal closure techniques on fascial wound healing and postoperative adhesions in experimental secondary peritonitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg (2008) 393: 67–731753028410.1007/s00423-007-0189-y
- 25SchecterWP, IvaturyRR, RotondoMF et al. Open abdomen after trauma and abdominal sepsis: a strategy for management. J Am Coll Surg (2006) 203: 390–3961693131110.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.001
- 26HirshbergA, WallMJJr, MattoxKL Planned reoperation for trauma: a two year experience with 124 consecutive patients. J Trauma (1994) 37: 365–369808389410.1097/00005373-199409000-00005
- 27WyrzykowskiAD, FelicianoDV DV Feliciano, KL Mattox, EE Moore Trauma damage control. Trauma (2008) 6New YorkMcGraw-Hill 851–870
- 28AsensioJA, McDuffieL, PetroneP et al. Reliable variables in the exsanguinated patient which indicate damage control and predict outcome. Am J Surg (2001) 182: 743–7511183935110.1016/S0002-9610(01)00809-1
- 29GarrisonJR, RichardsonJD, HilakosAS et al. Predicting the need to pack early for severe intra-abdominal hemorrhage. J Trauma (1996) 40: 923–927865647810.1097/00005373-199606000-00010
- 30CosgriffN, MooreEE, SauaiaA et al. Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidosis revisited. J Trauma (1997) 42: 857–861919166710.1097/00005373-199705000-00016
- 31SharpKW, LociceroRJ Abdominal packing for surgically uncontrollable hemorrhage. Ann Surg (1992) 215: 467–474161638310.1097/00000658-199205000-00009
- 32DiazJJJr, CullinaneDC, DuttonWD et al. The management of the open abdomen in trauma and emergency general surgery. Part 1. Damage control. J Trauma (2010) 68: 1425–14382053918610.1097/TA.0b013e3181da0da5
- 33MalbrainML, CheathamML, KirkpatrickA et al. Results from the international conference of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. I. Definitions. Intensive Care Med (2006) 32: 1722–17321696729410.1007/s00134-006-0349-5
- 34CheathamML, MalbrainML, KirkpatrickA et al. Results from the international conference of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. II. Recommendations. Intensive Care Med (2007) 33: 951–9621737776910.1007/s00134-007-0592-4
- 35JohnsonJW, GraciasVH, SchwabCW et al. Evolution in damage control for exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma (2001) 51: 261–2691149378310.1097/00005373-200108000-00007
- 36WittmannDH, AprahamianC, BergsteinJM Etappenlavage: advanced diffuse peritonitis managed by planned multiple laparotomies utilizing zippers, slide fastener, and Velcro analogue for temporary abdominal closure. World J Surg (1990) 14: 218–226218348510.1007/BF01664876
- 37Van RulerO, MahlerCW, BoerKR et al. Comparison of on-demand vs. planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA (2007) 298: 865–8721771207010.1001/jama.298.8.865
- 38SmithPC, TweddellJS, BesseyPQ Alternative approaches to abdominal wound closure in severely injured patients with massive visceral edema. J Trauma (1992) 32: 16–20173256710.1097/00005373-199201000-00004
- 39TremblayLN, FelicianoDV, SchmidtJ et al. Skin only or silo closure in the critically ill patient with an open abdomen. Am J Surg (2001) 182: 670–6751183933610.1016/S0002-9610(01)00805-4
- 40KirshteinB, Roy-ShapiraA, LantsbergL et al. Use of the “Bogota bag” for temporary abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis. Am Surg (2007) 73: 249–25217375780
- 41Brox-JimenezA, Ruiz-LuqueV, Torres-ArcosC et al. Experience with the Bogota bag technique for temporary abdominal closure. Cir Esp (2007) 82: 150–1541791628510.1016/S0009-739X(07)71690-1
- 42BatacchiS, MatanoS, NellaA et al. Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures. Crit Care (2009) 13: R1941996161410.1186/cc8193
- 43HowdieshellTR, YehKA, HawkinsML et al. Temporary abdominal wall closure in trauma patients: indications, technique, and results. World J Surg (1995) 19: 154–158774080410.1007/BF00317004
- 44DoyonA, DevroedeG, ViensD et al. A simple, inexpensive, life-saving way to perform iterative laparotomy in patients with severe intra-abdominal sepsis. Colorectal Dis (2001) 3: 115–1211279100410.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00214.x
- 45FoyHM, NathensAB, MaserB et al. Reinforced silicone elastomer sheeting, an improved method of temporary abdominal closure in damage control laparotomy. Am J Surg (2003) 185: 498–5011272757410.1016/S0002-9610(03)00059-X
- 46HowdieshellTR, ProctorCD, SternbergE et al. Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen. Am J Surg (2004) 188: 301–3061545083810.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.03.007
- 47BeeTK, CroceMA, MagnottiLJ et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma (2008) 65: 337–3421869546810.1097/TA.0b013e31817fa451
- 48MayberryJC, BurgessEA, GoldmanRK et al. Enterocutaneous fistula and ventral hernia after absorbable mesh prosthesis closure for trauma: the plain truth. J Trauma (2004) 57: 157–1621528456710.1097/01.TA.0000102411.69521.80
- 49JerniganTW, FabianTC, CroceMA et al. Staged management of giant abdominal wall defects: acute and long-term results. Ann Surg (2003) 238: 349–35514501501
- 50TonsC, SchachtruppA, RauM et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome: prevention and treatment. Chirurg (2000) 71: 918–9261101381110.1007/s001040051156
- 51SugrueM, JonesF, JanjuaKJ et al. Temporary abdominal closure: a prospective evaluation of its effects on renal and respiratory physiology. J Trauma (1998) 45: 914–921982070310.1097/00005373-199811000-00013
- 52VertreesA, KellicutD, OttmanS et al. Early definitive abdominal closure using serial closure technique on injured soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. J Am Coll Surg (2006) 202: 762–7721664801610.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.02.008
- 53VertreesA, GreerL, PickettC et al. Modern management of complex open abdominal wounds of war: a 5-year experience. J Am Coll Surg (2008) 207: 801–8091918352510.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.014
- 54WittmannDH Staged abdominal repair: development and current practice of an advanced operative technique for diffuse suppurative peritonitis. Acta Chir Austriaca (2000) 32: 171–178
10.1007/BF02949258 Google Scholar
- 55HadeedJG, StamanGW, SariolHS et al. Delayed primary closure in damage control laparotomy: the value of the Wittmann Patch. Am Surg (2007) 73: 10–1217249448
- 56KeramatiM, SrivastavaA, SakabuS et al. The Wittmann Patch is a temporary abdominal closure device after decompressive celiotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome following burn. Burns (2008) 34: 493–4971794991610.1016/j.burns.2007.06.024
- 57WeinbergJA, GeorgeRL, GriffinRL et al. Closing the open abdomen: improved success with Wittmann Patch staged abdominal closure. J Trauma (2008) 65: 345–3481869546910.1097/TA.0b013e31817fa489
- 58TieuBH, ChoSD, LuemN et al. The use of the Wittmann Patch facilitates a high rate of fascial closure in severely injured trauma patients and critically ill emergency surgery patients. J Trauma (2008) 65: 865–8701884980410.1097/TA.0b013e31818481f1
- 59SmithLA, BarkerDE, ChaseCW et al. Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a four-year experience. Am Surg (1997) 63: 1102–11079393260discussion 1107–1108
- 60BarkerDE, KaufmanHJ, SmithLA et al. Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients. J Trauma (2000) 48: 201–2061069707510.1097/00005373-200002000-00001
- 61GarnerGB, WareDN, CocanourCS et al. Vacuum-assisted wound closure provides early fascial reapproximation in trauma patients with open abdomens. Am J Surg (2001) 182: 630–6381183932910.1016/S0002-9610(01)00786-3
- 62MillerPR, ThompsonJT, FalerBJ et al. Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management. J Trauma (2002) 53: 843–8491243593310.1097/00005373-200211000-00007
- 63NavsariaPH, BuntingM, Omoshoro-JonesJ et al. Temporary closure of open abdominal wounds by the modified sandwich-vacuum pack technique. Br J Surg (2003) 90: 718–7221280862110.1002/bjs.4101
- 64SuliburkJW, WareDN, BaloghZ et al. Vacuum-assisted wound closure achieves early fascial closure of open abdomens after severe trauma. J Trauma (2003) 55: 1155–11601467666510.1097/01.TA.0000100218.03754.6A
- 65MillerPR, MeredithJW, JohnsonJC et al. Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen: planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced. Ann Surg (2004) 239: 608–6141508296410.1097/01.sla.0000124291.09032.bf
- 66StonePA, HassSM, FlahertySK et al. Vacuum-assisted fascial closure for patients with abdominal trauma. J Trauma (2004) 57: 1082–10861558003610.1097/01.TA.0000149248.02598.9E
- 67MillerRS, MorrisJAJr, DiazJJJr et al. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma (2005) 59: 1365–13711639491010.1097/01.ta.0000196004.49422.af
- 68OettingP, RauB, SchlagPM Abdominal vacuum device with open abdomen. Chirurg (2006) 77(586): 588–593
- 69CothrenCC, MooreEE, JohnsonJL et al. One hundred percent fascial approximation with sequential abdominal closure of the open abdomen. Am J Surg (2006) 192: 238–2421686063710.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.04.010
- 70PerezD, WildiS, DemartinesN et al. Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg (2007) 205: 586–5921790373410.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.015
- 71TeixeiraPG, SalimA, InabaK et al. A prospective look at the current state of open abdomens. Am Surg (2008) 74: 891–89718942608
- 72WondbergD, LarussonHJ, MetzgerU et al. Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate. World J Surg (2008) 32: 2724–27291883676210.1007/s00268-008-9762-y
- 73OzgucH, PaksoyE, OzturkE Temporary abdominal closure with the vacuum pack technique: a 5-year experience. Acta Chir Belg (2008) 108: 414–41918807592
- 74KritayakiranaK, MaggioPM, BrundageS et al. Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients. J Emerg Trauma Shock (2010) 3: 118–1222060678610.4103/0974-2700.62106
- 75AcostaS, BjarnasonT, PeterssonU et al. Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Br J Surg (2011) 98: 735–7432146217610.1002/bjs.7383
- 76MacLeanAA, O’KeeffeT, AugensteinJ Management strategies for the open abdomen: survey of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma membership. Acta Chir Belg (2008) 108: 212–21818557146
- 77RutherfordEJ, SkeeteDA, BraselKJ Management of the patient with an open abdomen: techniques in temporary and definitive closure. Curr Probl Surg (2004) 41: 811–87610.1067/j.cpsurg.2004.08.002
- 78MattoxKL Introduction, background, and future projections of damage control surgery. Surg Clin North Am (1997) 77: 753–759929197810.1016/S0039-6109(05)70581-8
- 79GhimentonF, ThomsonSR, MuckartDJ et al. Abdominal content containment: practicalities and outcome. Br J Surg (2000) 87: 106–1091060692010.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01337.x
- 80NagyKK, FildesJJ, MahrC et al. Experience with three prosthetic materials in temporary abdominal wall closure. Am Surg (1996) 62: 331–3358615556
- 81Boele van HensbroekP, WindJ, DijkgraafMG et al. Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg (2009) 33: 199–2071908949410.1007/s00268-008-9867-3
- 82BrockWB, BarkerDE, BurnsRP Temporary closure of open abdominal wounds: the vacuum pack. Am Surg (1995) 61: 30–357832378
- 83Sammons A, Delgado A, Cheatham ML (2009) In vitro pressure manifold distribution evaluation of ABThera active abdominal therapy, V.A.C. abdominal dressing system, and the Barker’s vacuum packing technique, conducted under dynamic conditions, pp 1–4. http://openabdomen.com, 2010
- 84VogelTR, DiazJJ, MillerRS et al. The open abdomen in trauma: do infectious complications affect primary abdominal closure?. Surg Infect (Larchmt) (2006) 7: 433–44110.1089/sur.2006.7.433
- 85CottonBA, GuyJS, MorrisJAJr et al. The cellular, metabolic, and systemic consequences of aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies. Shock (2006) 26: 115–1211687801710.1097/01.shk.0000209564.84822.f2
- 86CottonBA, GunterOL, IsbellJ et al. Damage control hematology: the impact of a trauma exsanguination protocol on survival and blood product utilization. J Trauma (2008) 64: 1177–11821846963810.1097/TA.0b013e31816c5c80
- 87HolcombJB, JenkinsD, RheeP et al. Damage control resuscitation: directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma. J Trauma (2007) 62: 307–3101729731710.1097/TA.0b013e3180324124
- 88FoucheY, SikorskiR, DuttonRP Changing paradigms in surgical resuscitation. Crit Care Med (2010) 38: S411–S4202072487410.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ec5bdf
- 89CottonBA, AuBK, NunezTC et al. Predefined massive transfusion protocols are associated with a reduction in organ failure and postinjury complications. J Trauma (2009) 66: 41–481913180410.1097/TA.0b013e31819313bb
- 90De LaetI, HosteE, VerholenE et al. The effect of neuromuscular blockers in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Intensive Care Med (2007) 33: 1811–18141759407210.1007/s00134-007-0758-0
- 91AbouassalyCT, DuttonWD, ZaydfudimV et al. Postoperative neuromuscular blocker use is associated with higher primary fascial closure rates after damage control laparotomy. J Trauma (2010) 69: 557–5612083812610.1097/TA.0b013e3181e77ca4
- 92MurphyGS, VenderJS Neuromuscular-blocking drugs: use and misuse in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin (2001) 17: 925–9421176226810.1016/S0749-0704(05)70187-1
- 93MooreEE, JonesTN Benefits of immediate jejunostomy feeding after major abdominal trauma: a prospective, randomized study. J Trauma (1986) 26: 874–881309555710.1097/00005373-198610000-00003
- 94MooreFA, FelicianoDV, AndrassyRJ et al. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications: the results of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg (1992) 216: 172–183138698210.1097/00000658-199208000-00008
- 95KudskKA, CroceMA, FabianTC et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding: effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann Surg (1992) 215: 503–511161638710.1097/00000658-199205000-00013
- 96CheathamML, SafcsakK, BrzezinskiSJ et al. Nitrogen balance, protein loss, and the open abdomen. Crit Care Med (2007) 35: 127–1311709594010.1097/01.CCM.0000250390.49380.94
- 97CothrenCC, MooreEE, CieslaDJ et al. Postinjury abdominal compartment syndrome does not preclude early enteral feeding after definitive closure. Am J Surg (2004) 188: 653–6581561947910.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.036
- 98CollierB, GuillamondeguiO, CottonB et al. Feeding the open abdomen. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr (2007) 31: 410–4151771215010.1177/0148607107031005410
- 99DissanaikeS, PhamT, ShalhubS et al. Effect of immediate enteral feeding on trauma patients with an open abdomen: protection from nosocomial infections. J Am Coll Surg (2008) 207: 690–6971895478110.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.332
- 100ByrnesMC, ReicksP, IrwinE Early enteral nutrition can be successfully implemented in trauma patients with an open abdomen. Am J Surg (2010) 199: 359–3622022691010.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.033
- 101SmithBP, AdamsRC, DoraiswamyVA et al. Review of abdominal damage control and open abdomens: focus on gastrointestinal complications. J Gastrointest Liver Dis (2010) 19: 425–435
- 102SchragSP, SharmaR, JaikNP et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointest Liver Dis (2007) 16: 407–418
- 103EricssonCD, FischerRP, RowlandsBJ et al. Prophylactic antibiotics in trauma: the hazards of underdosing. J Trauma (1989) 29: 1356–1361281041010.1097/00005373-198910000-00011
- 104ReedRLII, EricssonCD, WuA et al. The pharmacokinetics of prophylactic antibiotics in trauma. J Trauma (1992) 32: 21–27173256910.1097/00005373-199201000-00005
- 105FabianTC Infection in penetrating abdominal trauma: risk factors and preventive antibiotics. Am Surg (2002) 68: 29–3512467313
- 106ToschlogEA, BlountKP, RotondoMF et al. Clinical predictors of subtherapeutic aminoglycoside levels in trauma patients undergoing once-daily dosing. J Trauma (2003) 55: 255–2601291363410.1097/01.TA.0000079367.23481.8D
- 107HakobyanRV, MkhoyanGG Epidural analgesia decreases intraabdominal pressure in postoperative patients with primary intra-abdominal hypertension. Acta Clin Belg (2008) 63: 86–9218575048