Volume 33, Issue 3 475 pp. 577-585
Article

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Traditional and Fast-Track Patient Care in Elective Open Infrarenal Aneurysm Repair

Bernd Muehling

Corresponding Author

Bernd Muehling

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Hubert Schelzig

Hubert Schelzig

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Steffen

Peter Steffen

Section of Pain Management, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Rainer Meierhenrich

Rainer Meierhenrich

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Ludger Sunder-Plassmann

Ludger Sunder-Plassmann

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Karl-Heinz Orend

Karl-Heinz Orend

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 January 2009
Citations: 101

This work was presented in part at the annual meeting of the German Society of Surgery, Surgical Forum 2008, Berlin, and was published as Best of Abstracts in Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery (Langenbecks Arch Surg (2008) 393:281–287).

Abstract

Background

Fast-track recovery programs have led to reduced patient morbidity and mortality after major surgery. In terms of elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair, no evidence is available about such programs. To address this issue, we have conducted a randomized prospective pilot study.

Methods

The study involved prospective randomization of 101 patients with the indication for elective open aneurysm repair in a traditional and a fast-track treatment arm. The basic fast-track elements were no bowel preparation, reduced preoperative fasting, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), enhanced postoperative feeding, and postoperative mobilization. Morbidity and mortality, need for postoperative mechanical ventilation, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and total length of postoperative hospital stay were analyzed in terms of an intention to treat.

Results

Demographic data for the two groups were similar. In the fast-track group the need for postoperative ventilation was significantly lower (6.1% versus 32%; p = 0.002), the median LOS on ICU did not significantly differ (20 h versus 32 h; p = 0.183), full enteral feeding was achieved significantly earlier (5 versus 7 days; p < 0.0001), and the rate of postoperative medical complications—gastrointestinal, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and infective—was significantly lower (16% versus 36%; p = 0.039). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the fast-track group (10 days versus 11 days; p = 0.016); the mortality rate in both groups was 0%.

Conclusions

An optimized patient care program in open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair shows favorable results concerning need for postoperative assisted mechanical ventilation, time to full enteral feeding, and incidence of medical complications. Further ranomized multicentric trials are necessary to justify broad implementation (clinical trials. gov identifier NCT 00615888).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.