Volume 2, Issue 3 pp. 146-152
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A damaging punch: Assessment and application of a method to quantify punch performance

Emily C. Dunn

Corresponding Author

Emily C. Dunn

Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research, School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Correspondence

Emily C. Dunn, Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research, School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Clare E. Humberstone

Clare E. Humberstone

Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
K. Fiona Iredale

K. Fiona Iredale

Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research, School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Anthony J. Blazevich

Anthony J. Blazevich

Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research, School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 January 2019
Citations: 21
Research completed at the Australian Institute of Sport Combat Centre, Canberra, Australia.

Abstract

Measurement of punch performance in a reliable, quantitative manner is relevant to combat sport, military, and concussion research. A punching protocol (3MPT) was developed, based on performance demands of amateur boxing, and evaluated on a custom-built punch integrator (PI). PI reliability and accuracy were assessed by calculating TE and CV for a range of known masses. A within-subject, repeated-measures design assessed the test-retest reliability of 3MPT. Fifteen male boxers (17.5 ± 0.5 years; 177.5 ± 9.5 cm; 73.0 ± 14.0 kg) were familiarized and then completed two 3MPT trials 90 minutes apart on 2 days (total of four tests). Peak punch force (N), relative punch force (N/kg), impulse (N·s), and rate of force development calculated to various time points were compared using a linear mixed model. Smallest worthwhile change (SWC) was also computed. PI data were reliable and accurate (CV <0.1%). TE and SWC comparisons revealed that 3MPT can detect moderate and large changes in performance; however, within-day reliability improved from day 1 (3.1%-13.8%) to 2 (2.3%-5.1%) indicating a possible learning effect. Likewise, differences between test one and two were greater on day 1 than 2. Numerous punch-related variables can be accurately and reliably measured using the 3MPT but repeat-trial familiarization is suggested to reduce between-test variability.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.