Wind- and sea wave-induced response mitigations of offshore wind turbines using track nonlinear energy sinks
Haoran Zuo
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
Search for more papers by this authorJian Zhang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Guo-Kai Yuan
China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
Correspondence
Songye Zhu, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Email: [email protected]
Guo-Kai Yuan, China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Songye Zhu
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
Correspondence
Songye Zhu, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Email: [email protected]
Guo-Kai Yuan, China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorHaoran Zuo
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
Search for more papers by this authorJian Zhang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Guo-Kai Yuan
China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
Correspondence
Songye Zhu, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Email: [email protected]
Guo-Kai Yuan, China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Songye Zhu
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
Correspondence
Songye Zhu, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Email: [email protected]
Guo-Kai Yuan, China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 52108479; Guangdong Natural Resources Department, Grant/Award Number: [2019]019; Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Grant/Award Numbers: BBW8, ZE2L, ZVX6, P0031763; Research Grants Council of Hong Kong, Grant/Award Numbers: C7038-20G, N_PolyU533/17
Summary
Modern offshore wind turbines (OWTs) are constructed with increasingly long blades and slender towers to capture wind resources more effectively. Consequently, OWTs have become vulnerable to wind and sea wave excitations. Mitigations of unfavorable OWT vibrations have been extensively investigated, with the majority focusing on passive vibration control strategies with control performance sensitive to structural frequency changes. Nonlinear energy sinks (NESs) are regarded as effective vibration control methods because their broadband fashion is robust against variations in structural frequencies. A novel NES with an improved track profile that combines both second- and fourth-order polynomials (Track II NES) is proposed in the present study to improve the vibration mitigation effectiveness of traditional Track I NES with a track profile of a fourth-order polynomial only. Governing equations of a single-degree-of-freedom system with Track II NES are first established, and an equivalent linearization method is adopted to optimize the track profile and damping of the Track II NES. Moreover, a detailed 3D finite element model of a representative 5-MW OWT is developed. Control effectiveness of the Track II NES is examined under different structural stiffnesses and mean wind speeds and then compared with that of conventional tuned mass damper (TMD) and Track I NES. Numerical results showed that the Track II NES can effectively suppress displacement and acceleration responses of OWTs and outperform its counterpart Track I NES. Moreover, the Track II NES can obtain reduction ratios close to those of the TMD but with better robustness against the detuning effect.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1 Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC). Global Wind Report 2019. 2020.
- 2 Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC). Global Wind Report-Annual Market Update 2017. 2018.
- 3Zuo H, Bi K, Hao H. A state-of-the-art review on the vibration mitigation of wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020; 121:109710.
- 4Brodersen ML, Bjørke AS, Høgsberg J. Active tuned mass damper for damping of offshore wind turbine vibrations. Wind Energy. 2017; 20: 783-796.
- 5Fitzgerald B, Sarkar S, Staino A. Improved reliability of wind turbine towers with active tuned mass dampers (ATMDs). J Sound Vib. 2018; 419: 103-122.
- 6Murtagh PJ, Ghosh A, Basu B, Broderick BM. Passive control of wind turbine vibrations including blade/tower interaction and rotationally sampled turbulence. Wind Energy. 2008; 11(4): 305-317.
- 7Lackner MA, Rotea MA. Passive structural control of offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy. 2011; 14(3): 373-388.
- 8Stewart GM, Lackner MA. The impact of passive tuned mass dampers and wind-wave misalignment on offshore wind turbine loads. Eng Struct. 2014; 73: 54-61.
- 9Dai K, Huang H, Lu Y, Meng J, Mao Z, Camara A. Effects of soil-structure interaction on the design of tuned mass damper to control the seismic response of wind turbine towers with gravity base. Wind Energy. 2021; 24: 323-344.
- 10Lin G-L, Lu L-Y, Lei K-T, Liu K-Y, Ko Y-Y, Ju S-H. Experimental study on seismic vibration control of an offshore wind turbine with TMD considering soil liquefaction effect. Marine Struct. 2021; 77:102961.
- 11Zhang Z, Staino A, Basu B, Nielsen SR. Performance evaluation of full-scale tuned liquid dampers (TLDs) for vibration control of large wind turbines using real-time hybrid testing. Eng Struct. 2016; 126: 417-431.
- 12Zhang Z, Basu B, Nielsen SR. Real-time hybrid aeroelastic simulation of wind turbines with various types of full-scale tuned liquid dampers. Wind Energy. 2019; 22: 239-256.
- 13Chen J, Georgakis CT. Spherical tuned liquid damper for vibration control in wind turbines. J Vib Control. 2013; 21(10): 1875-1885.
- 14Colwell S, Basu B. Tuned liquid column dampers in offshore wind turbines for structural control. Eng Struct. 2009; 31(2): 358-368.
- 15Chen J, Liu Y, Bai X. Shaking table test and numerical analysis of offshore wind turbine tower systems controlled by TLCD. Earthq Eng Eng Vib. 2015; 14(1): 55-75.
- 16Chen J, Zhao Y, Cong O, He M. Vibration control using double-response damper and site measurements on wind turbine. Struct Control Health Monit. 2018;e2200.
- 17Chen J, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Feng Y. Experimental research on design parameters of basin tuned and particle damper for wind turbine tower on shaker. Struct Control Health Monit. 2019;e2440.
- 18Zhang Z-L, Chen J-B, Li J. Theoretical study and experimental verification of vibration control of offshore wind turbines by a ball vibration absorber. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2013; 10(8): 1087-1100.
- 19Sun C, Jahangiri V. Bi-directional vibration control of offshore wind turbines using a 3D pendulum tuned mass damper. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2018; 105: 338-360.
- 20Sun C, Jahangiri V. Fatigue damage mitigation of offshore wind turbines under real wind and wave conditions. Eng Struct. 2019; 178: 472-483.
- 21Zhao Z, Dai K, Lalonde ER, et al. Studies on application of scissor-jack braced viscous damper system in wind turbines under seismic and wind loads. Eng Struct. 2019; 196:109294.
- 22Larsen TG, Zhang Z, Høgsberg J. Vibration damping of an offshore wind turbine by optimally calibrated pendulum absorber with shunted electromagnetic transducer. J Sound Vib. 2021; 505:116144.
- 23Zuo H, Bi K, Hao H. Using multiple tuned mass dampers to control offshore wind turbine vibrations under multiple hazards. Eng Struct. 2017; 141: 303-315.
- 24Hussan M, Rahman MS, Sharmin F, Kim D, Do J. Multiple tuned mass damper for multi-mode vibration reduction of offshore wind turbine under seismic excitation. Ocean Eng. 2018; 160: 449-460.
- 25Hu Y, Wang J, Chen MZ, Li Z, Sun Y. Load mitigation for a barge-type floating offshore wind turbine via inerter-based passive structural control. Eng Struct. 2018; 177: 198-209.
- 26Zhang R, Zhao Z, Dai K. Seismic response mitigation of a wind turbine tower using a tuned parallel inerter mass system. Eng Struct. 2019; 180: 29-39.
- 27Zuo H, Bi K, Hao H, Ma R. Influences of ground motion parameters and structural damping on the optimum design of inerter-based tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct. 2021; 227:111422.
- 28Sun C. Mitigation of offshore wind turbine responses under wind and wave loading: Considering soil effects and damage. Struct Control Health Monit. 2018; 25:e2117.
- 29Bhattacharya S, Cox JA, Lombardi D, Muir WD. Dynamics of offshore wind turbines supported on two foundations. Proc Insti Civil Eng-Geotechn Eng. 2013; 166(2): 159-169.
- 30Wang L, Zhou W, Guo Z, Rui S. Frequency change and accumulated inclination of offshore wind turbine jacket structure with piles in sand under cyclic loadings. Ocean Eng. 2020; 217:108045.
- 31Gendelman O, Manevitch L, Vakakis AF, M'closkey R. Energy pumping in nonlinear mechanical oscillators: part I-dynamics of the underlying Hamiltonian systems. J Appl Mech. 2001; 68(1): 34-41.
- 32Wierschem NE, Luo J, Al-Shudeifat M, et al. Experimental testing and numerical simulation of a six-story structure incorporating two-degree-of-freedom nonlinear energy sink. J Struct Eng. 2014; 140(6):04014027.
- 33Gendelman O, Starosvetsky Y, Feldman M. Attractors of harmonically forced linear oscillator with attached nonlinear energy sink I: description of response regimes. Nonlinear Dyn. 2008; 51(1–2): 31-46.
- 34AL-Shudeifat MA. Highly efficient nonlinear energy sink. Nonlinear Dyn. 2014; 76(4): 1905-1920.
- 35Al-Shudeifat MA, Wierschem N, Quinn DD, Vakakis AF, Bergman LA, Spencer BF Jr. Numerical and experimental investigation of a highly effective single-sided vibro-impact non-linear energy sink for shock mitigation. Int J Non-linear Mech. 2013; 52: 96-109.
- 36Wierschem NE, Hubbard SA, Luo J, et al. Response attenuation in a large-scale structure subjected to blast excitation utilizing a system of essentially nonlinear vibration absorbers. J Sound Vib. 2017; 389: 52-72.
- 37Luo J, Wierschem NE, Hubbard SA, et al. Large-scale experimental evaluation and numerical simulation of a system of nonlinear energy sinks for seismic mitigation. Eng Struct. 2014; 77: 34-48.
- 38Nucera F, Iacono FL, McFarland D, Bergman L, Vakakis A. Application of broadband nonlinear targeted energy transfers for seismic mitigation of a shear frame: Experimental results. J Sound Vib. 2008; 313(1–2): 57-76.
- 39AL-Shudeifat MA. Asymmetric magnet-based nonlinear energy sink. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2015; 10(1):014502.
- 40Chen Y-Y, Qian Z-C, Zhao W, Chang C-M. A magnetic Bi-stable nonlinear energy sink for structural seismic control. J Sound Vib. 2020; 473:115233.
- 41Lu Z, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Lu X. Nonlinear dissipative devices in structural vibration control: A review. J Sound Vib. 2018; 423: 18-49.
- 42Das S, Chakraborty S, Chen Y, Tesfamariam S. Robust design optimization for SMA based nonlinear energy sink with negative stiffness and friction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020; 140:106466.
- 43Zhang Y-W, Lu Y-N, Zhang W, et al. Nonlinear energy sink with inerter. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2019; 125: 52-64.
- 44Wang J, Wang B, Zhang C, Liu Z. Effectiveness and robustness of an asymmetric nonlinear energy sink-inerter for dynamic response mitigation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2021; 50: 1628-1650.
- 45Javidialesaadi A, Wierschem NE. An inerter-enhanced nonlinear energy sink. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2019; 129: 449-454.
- 46Wang J, Wierschem NE, Spencer BF Jr, Lu X. Track nonlinear energy sink for rapid response reduction in building structures. J Eng Mech. 2015; 141(1):04014104.
- 47Wang J, Li H, Wang B, Liu Z, Zhang C. Development of a two-phased nonlinear mass damper for displacement mitigation in base-isolated structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2019; 123: 435-448.
- 48Wang J, Wierschem NE, Wang B, Spencer BF Jr. Multi-objective design and performance investigation of a high-rise building with track nonlinear energy sinks. Struct Design Tall Special Build. 2020; 29(2):e1692.
- 49Wang J, Wierschem N, Spencer BF Jr, Lu X. Experimental study of track nonlinear energy sinks for dynamic response reduction. Eng Struct. 2015; 94: 9-15.
- 50Wang J, Wang B, Liu Z, Li H, Zhang C. Seismic response mitigation of building structures with a novel vibro-impact dual-mass damper. Eng Struct. 2020; 215:110673.
- 51Wang J, Wierschem N, Spencer BF Jr, Lu X. Numerical and experimental study of the performance of a single-sided vibro-impact track nonlinear energy sink. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2016; 45(4): 635-652.
- 52Zuo H, Bi K, Hao H. Simultaneous out-of-plane and in-plane vibration mitigations of offshore monopile wind turbines by tuned mass dampers. Smart Struct Syst. 2020; 26(4): 435-449.
- 53Roberts JB, Spanos PD. Random vibration and statistical linearization. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1990.
- 54Wang J, Wang B, Wierschem NE, Spencer BF Jr. Dynamic analysis of track nonlinear energy sinks subjected to simple and stochastic excitations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2020; 49(9): 863-883.
- 55Soong TT, Grigoriu M. Random vibration of mechanical and structural systems. New Jersey: P T R Prentice-Hall Inc.; 1993.
- 56Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2009.
10.2172/947422 Google Scholar
- 57Zuo H, Bi K, Hao H, Li C. Influence of earthquake ground motion modelling on the dynamic responses of offshore wind turbines. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2019; 121: 151-167.
- 58 Det Norske Veritas (DNV). DNV-RP-C205: environmental conditions and environmental loads. Norway: DNV; 2010.
- 59Vorpahl F, Strobel M, Jonkman JM, Larsen TJ, Passon P, Nichols J. Verification of aero-elastic offshore wind turbine design codes under IEA Wind Task XXIII. Wind Energy. 2014; 17(4): 519-547.
- 60Meng J, Dai K, Zhao Z, et al. Study on the aerodynamic damping for the seismic analysis of wind turbines in operation. Renew Energy. 2020; 159: 1224-1242.
- 61Chen B, Zhang Z, Hua X, Basu B, Nielsen SR. Identification of aerodynamic damping in wind turbines using time-frequency analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017; 91: 198-214.
- 62Valamanesh V, Myers A. Aerodynamic damping and seismic response of horizontal axis wind turbine towers. J Struct Eng. 2014; 140(11):04014090.
- 63 ASCE/AWEA. Recommended practice for compliance of large land-based wind turbine support structures. Reston, VA: ASCE/AWEA RP2011; 2011.
- 64Moriarty PJ, Craig HA. AeroDyn Theory Manual No. NREL/EL-500-36881. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2005.
10.2172/15014831 Google Scholar
- 65Bisoi S, Haldar S. Dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine in clay considering soil-monopile-tower interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2014; 63: 19-35.
- 66Arany L, Bhattacharya S, Macdonald JH, Hogan SJ. Closed form solution of Eigen frequency of monopile supported offshore wind turbines in deeper waters incorporating stiffness of substructure and SSI. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2016; 83: 18-32.
- 67 IEC 61400–1. Wind turbines-Part 1: Design requirements. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2005.
- 68Hasselmann K, Barnett T, Bouws E, et al. Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Hamburg: Deutsches Hydrographisches Institut; 1973.
- 69Ma R, Bi K, Hao H. A novel rotational inertia damper for heave motion suppression of semisubmersible platform in the shallow sea. Struct Control Health Monit. 2019;e2368.
- 70Zuo H, Bi K, Hao H. Dynamic analyses of operating offshore wind turbines including soil-structure interaction. Eng Struct. 2018; 157: 42-62.
- 71Zuo H, Bi K, Hao H. Mitigation of tower and out-of-plane blade vibrations of offshore monopile wind turbines by using multiple tuned mass dampers. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2019; 15(2): 269-284.