Volume 55, Issue 10 pp. 450-456
Research Paper

Physical Basis for Separation of Rice Starch using Various Density Gradient Systems and its Effect on Starch Recovery, Purity, and Pasting Properties

Harmeet S. Guraya

Corresponding Author

Harmeet S. Guraya

USDA ARS Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA 70179, USA

USDA ARS Southern Regional Research Center, PO Box 19687, New Orleans, LA 70179, USA. Phone: +1-504-286-4258, Fax: +1-504-286-4430Search for more papers by this author
Charles James

Charles James

USDA ARS Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA 70179, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Elaine T. Champagne

Elaine T. Champagne

USDA ARS Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA 70179, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 October 2003
Citations: 10

Abstract

A 32% waxy and non waxy rice flour slurry containing starch-protein agglomerates was physically disrupted in presence of water by use of high pressure homogenizer called Microfluidizer®. Microfluidized rice flour slurry from passes 2 and 4 was collected followed by isolation of starch using three different density gradient solutions/systems (CeCl, NaCl/sucrose and ZnSO4·7H2 O). Complete deagglomeration was obtained after passing the rice flour slurry four times through the Microfluidizer®. The recovery of isolated starch varied from 76.28% to 91.20% for different density gradient systems. The degree of deagglomeration did not seem to affect recovery but affected the purity of the isolated starches. All starches produced from pass 4 rice slurry resulted in starches with residual protein below 0.5%. Higher density of the gradient solution resulted in higher recovery and purity of starch. The isolation method had a significant effect on the pasting properties of the isolated starch. Residual protein in isolated starch had a negative correlation with peak viscosity and setback of pass 2 waxy and nonwaxy starches. The salts were retained in purified starch despite rigorous washing (at least 75 times greater than the control) and could affect starch properties.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.