Incidental carcinoma of the prostate
George Van Andel MD
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorRuud Vleeming MD
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Karlheinz Kurth MD, PhD
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Dept. of Urology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Mei-bergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this authorTheo M. De Reijke MD
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorGeorge Van Andel MD
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorRuud Vleeming MD
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Karlheinz Kurth MD, PhD
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Dept. of Urology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Mei-bergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this authorTheo M. De Reijke MD
Department of Urology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), digital rectal examination (DRE), and quantification of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are accepted and evaluated methods for detecting prostate cancer. Positive predictive values (PPV) of DRE and TRUS are low, and only slightly enhanced when used in combination with PSA. PSA lacks sufficient sensitivity and specifity to be used alone as a screening test for prostate cancer. The parameters PSA-density and PSA-velocity make PSA a better tumor marker, but they are not reliable on an individual basis. Age-specific reference ranges have the potential to make PSA a more sensitive tumor marker for men less than 60 years of age and a more specific one for men beyond 60 years. With currently available diagnostic methods approximately 10% of patients undergoing transurethral or open resection of the prostate for presumed benign prostatic hyperplasia will have carcinoma detected in the histologie material. In 392 patients successively treated in our clinic for presumed BPH and thoroughly investigated to exclude prostatic carcinoma (DRE, TRUS, biopsy when PSA > 4 ng/ml or PSA-D > 0.15), the tumor was found incidentally in 4%. Another finding in this study was the detection of prostatic carcinoma by random biopsy in patients without a palpable or visible tumor by imaging and without PSA increase ( > 4 ng/ml). Biopsies were performed because of a hypoe-choic zone in the opposite lobe which turned out to be negative. Such tumors cannot be properly classified in the current TNM system. Treatment options for patients with incidental prostatic carcinoma are age- and stage-dependent. Patients less than 60 years old may be treated with a curative approach, irrespective of the T category (Tla or Tib); patients with a life expectancy longer than 10 years and a pTlb incidental carcinoma likewise should be offered a curative therapy. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
References
- 1 Whitmore WF Jr: Symposium on hormones and cancer therapy: hormone therapy in prostate cancer. Am J Med 21: 697–699, 1956.
- 2 Jewett H: The present status of radical prostatectomy for stage A and B prostatic cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2(1): 105–124, 1975.
- 3 Paul P: Problems and clinical significance of incidental carcinoma of the prostate. In JE Altwein, P Faul, W Schneider (eds): “ Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate.” Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1991, 1–9.
- 4 Breda G, Silvestre P, Giunta A, et al: Stage A prostate cancer: Follow-up with digital rectal exploration, prostate markers, fine-needle aspiration, ultrasonographically guided needle biopsy and biopsies of the residual prostate with rectoscope. Eur Urol 25: 116–118, 1994.
- 5 Schroder FH, Hermanek P, Denis L, et al: The TNM classification of prostate carcinoma. Prostate (Suppl) 4: 129–138, 1992.
- 6
Guinan PD,
Rubenstein M:
Methods of early diagnosis in genitourinary cancer.
Cancer (Suppl)
60: 668–676,
1987.
10.1002/1097-0142(19870801)60:3+<668::AID-CNCR2820601537>3.0.CO;2-P CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 7 Lee F, Littrup PJ, Torp Pedersen ST: Prostate cancer: Comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening. Radiology 168: 389–394, 1988.
- 8
Mettlin C,
Lee F,
Drago J, et al
and the investigators of the ACS-NPCDP:
American Cancer Society-National Prostate Cancer Detection Project: findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men.
Cancer
67: 2949–2958,
1991.
10.1002/1097-0142(19910615)67:12<2949::AID-CNCR2820671202>3.0.CO;2-X CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 9 Cooner WH: Prostate-specific antigen coordinated with digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in the detection of prostate cancer. World J Urol 11: 214–217, 1993.
- 10 Vijverberg PLM: Transrectal ultrasound for diagnosis and treatment of localized prostatic cancer. Thesis, University of Amsterdam 4: 49–60, 1993.
- 11 Vleeming R, Noordzij JW, Reijke de ThM, et al: The detection of prostatic carcinoma. World J Urol 11: 66–68, 1993.
- 12 Guinan PD, Bush I, Ray V, et al: The accuracy of the rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma. N Engl J Med 303(9): 499–503, 1980.
- 13 Allhoff EP, Liedke SG, Gonnerman O, et al: Efficient pathway for early detection of prostate cancer concluded from a 5 year prospective study. World J Urol 11: 201–205, 1993.
- 14 Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, et al: Prostate specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med 317: 909–916, 1987.
- 15 Catalona WJ: Screening for prostate cancer enthusiasm. Urology 42: 113–115, 1993.
- 16 Crawford ED, DeAntoni EP: PSA as a screening test for prostate cancer. Urol Clin North AM 20(4): 637–647, 1993.
- 17 Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al: Measurement of prostatic specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 324(17): 1156–1161, 1991.
- 18
Brawer MK,
Lange PH:
Prostate-specific antigen: its role in early detection, staging and monitoring patients with prostatic carcinoma.
J Endourol
3: 227–236,
1989.
10.1089/end.1989.3.227 Google Scholar
- 19 Shinohara K, Wheeler T, Scardino PT: The appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography: correlation of imaging and pathological examinations. J Urol 142: 76–82, 1989.
- 20
Cooner WH,
Mosley BR,
Rutherford CL, et al:
Coordination of urosonography and prostatic specific antigen in the diagnosis of nonpalpable prostate cancer.
J Endourol
3: 193–199,
1989.
10.1089/end.1989.3.193 Google Scholar
- 21
Hunter PK,
Butler SA,
Hodge GB, et al:
Detection of prostate cancer using transrectal ultrasound and sonographically guided biopsy in 1410 symptomatic patients.
J Endourol
3: 167–175,
1989.
10.1089/end.1989.3.167 Google Scholar
- 22
Perrin P,
Mouriquand P,
Monsallier M, et al:
Hypothetical place of transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer at an early stage.
J Endourol
3: 109–1113,
1989.
10.1089/end.1989.3.109 Google Scholar
- 23 Lee F, Torp-Pedersen ST, Littrup PJ, et al: Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. Radiology 170: 29–32, 1989.
- 24
Bostwick DG,
Cooner WH,
Denis L, et al:
The association of benign prostatic hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate.
Cancer (Suppl)
70(1):
291–301,
1992.
10.1002/1097-0142(19920701)70:1+<291::AID-CNCR2820701317>3.0.CO;2-4 PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 25 Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL Jr, et al: Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 143: 1146–1154, 1990.
- 26 Benson MC, Whang IS, Olssen CA, et al: The use of prostate specific antigen density to enhance the predictive value of intermediate levels of serum prostate specific antigen. J Urol 147: 817–821, 1992.
- 27 Benson MC, McMahon DJ, Cooner WH, et al: An algorithm for prostate cancer detection in a patient population using prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density. World J Urol 11: 206–213, 1993.
- 28 Wolff JM, Scholz A, Boeckmann W, et al: Differentiation between benign prostatic hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate employing prostate-specific-antigen-density. Poster (27), 2nd Int Congr Dutch Urol Assoc, Amsterdam, 1993.
- 29 Brawer MK, Aramburu EAG, Chen GL, et al: The inability of prostate specific antigen index to enhance the predictive value of prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma. J Urol 150: 369–373, 1993.
- 30 Vleeming R, Craen de AJM, Reijke de ThM, et al: To biopt or not to biopt? Does PSA-density alter decision making? Xlth Congr Eur Assoc Urol, Berlin, July 13–16, 1994, 43A.
- 31 Carter HB, Pearson JD, Metter JE, et al: Longitudinal evaluation of prostate specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease. JAMA 267: 2215–2220, 1992.
- 32 Oesterling J, Cooner WH, Jacobson SJ, et al: Influence of patient age on the serum PSA concentration: an important clinical observation. Urol Clin North Am 20: 671–681, 1993.
- 33 Oesterling JE: The influence of patient age and race on the serum PSA: a rationale for age-specific and race-specific reference ranges. Presented at Xlth Congr EAU, Berlin, 1994.
- 34 Denton SE, Choy SH, Valk WL: Occult prostatic carcinoma diagnosed by the step section technique of the surgical specimen. J Urol 93: 296–298, 1965.
- 35 Vollmer RT: Prostate cancer and chip specimens: complete versus partial sampling. Hum Pathol, 17: 285–290, 1986.
- 36 Murphy GP, Dean PJ, Brasfield JA, et al: Incidental carcinoma of the prostate. How much sampling is adequate? Am J Surg Pathol 10: 170–174, 1986.
- 37 Moore GH, Lawshe B, Murphy J: Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in transurethral resectates of the prostate gland. Am J Surg Pathol 10(3): 165–169, 1986.
- 38 Sheldon CA, Williams RD, Fraley EE: Incidental carcinoma of the prostate: a review of the literature and critical reappraisal of classification. J Urol 124: 626–631, 1980.
- 39 Zincke H, Blute ML, Fallen MJ, et al: Radical prostatectomy for stage A adenocarcinoma of the prostate: staging errors and their implications for treatment recommendations and disease outcome. J Urol 146: 1053–1058, 1991.
- 40 Voges GE, MacNeal JE, Redwine EA, et al: The predictive significance of substaging stage A prostate cancer (Al versus A2) for volume and grade of total cancer in the prostate. J Urol 147: 858–863, 1992.
- 41 Oesterling JE, Brendler CB, Epstein JI, et al: Correlation of clinical stage, serum prostatic acid phosphatase, Gleason grade with final pathological stage in 275 patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 138: 92–97, 1987.
- 42
Parfitt HE Jr,
Smith JA Jr,
Gliedman JB, et al:
Accuracy of staging in Al carcinoma of the prostate.
Cancer
51: 2346–2350,
1983.
10.1002/1097-0142(19830615)51:12<2346::AID-CNCR2820511230>3.0.CO;2-S PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 43 Rossignol G, Leandri P, Ramon J, et al: Radical prostatectomy in stage A carcinoma of the prostate: outcome of 115 patients. Abstract 11, 1st Int Congr Dutch Urol Assoc, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1991.
- 44 Donohue RE, Mani JH, Whitesel JA, et al: Pelvic lymph node dissection. Urology 20: 559–565, 1982.
- 45
Babaian RJ,
Troncose P,
Ayala A:
Transurethral resection zone prostate cancer detected at cystoprostatectomy.
Cancer
67: 1418–1422,
1991.
10.1002/1097-0142(19910301)67:5<1418::AID-CNCR2820670524>3.0.CO;2-A CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 46 Hamper UM, Sheth S, Walsh PC, et al: Carcinoma of the prostate: value of transrectal sonography in detecting extension in the neurovascular bundle. AJR 155: 1015–1019, 1990.
- 47 Platt JF, Bree RL, Schwab K: The accuracy of CT in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. AJR 149(2): 315–318, 1987.
- 48 Pollack HM, Schnall MD: Magnetic Resonance Imaging in carcinoma of the prostate. Prostate (Suppl.) 4: 17–31, 1992.
- 49 Schnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszewski J, et al: Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 178: 797–802, 1991.
- 50 Chelsky MJ, Schnall MD, Seidmon EJ, et al: Use of the endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. J Urol 150: 391–395, 1993.
- 51 Jager JG, Barentsz JO, de la Rosette JJ, et al: Preliminary results of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. Radiology 34(3): 129–133, 1994.
- 52 Byar DP and The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group: Survival of patients with incidentally found microscopic cancer of the prostate: results of a clinical trial of conservative treatment. J Urol 108: 908–919, 1972.
- 53 Epstein JL, Paull G, Eggleston JC, et al: Prognosis of untreated stage Al prostatic carcinoma: a study of 94 cases with extended follow up. J Urol 136: 837–839, 1986.
- 54 Davidson PTJ: Diagnosis, prognosis and management of incidentally found prostate cancer. Urol Res 21: 1–8, 1993.
- 55 Blute ML, Zincke H, Farrow GM, et al: Long-term followup of young patients with stage A adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 136: 840–843, 1986.
- 56 Soloway MSD, Altwein JE: The management of incidental TlaGl (TNM 1987) prostate cancer. Prostate (Suppl) 4: 149–151, 1992.