Volume 35, Issue 16 pp. 2786-2801
Research Article

Bayesian multinomial probit modeling of daily windows of susceptibility for maternal PM2.5 exposure and congenital heart defects

Joshua L. Warren

Corresponding Author

Joshua L. Warren

Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, U.S.A.

Correspondence to: Joshua L. Warren, Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, PO Box 208034 New Haven, CT 06520-8034, U.S.A.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jeanette A. Stingone

Jeanette A. Stingone

Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Amy H. Herring

Amy H. Herring

Department of Biostatistics, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas J. Luben

Thomas J. Luben

National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, USA Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Montserrat Fuentes

Montserrat Fuentes

Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Arthur S. Aylsworth

Arthur S. Aylsworth

Department of Pediatrics and Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Peter H. Langlois

Peter H. Langlois

Texas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Lorenzo D. Botto

Lorenzo D. Botto

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Adolfo Correa

Adolfo Correa

Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew F. Olshan

Andrew F. Olshan

Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
National Birth Defects Prevention Study

National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 February 2016
Citations: 23
Contract/grant sponsor: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; contract/grant number: 5R01ES014843-02R01ES020619T32ES007018

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies suggest that maternal ambient air pollution exposure during critical periods of pregnancy is associated with adverse effects on fetal development. In this work, we introduce new methodology for identifying critical periods of development during post-conception gestational weeks 2–8 where elevated exposure to particulate matter less than 2.5 µm (PM2.5) adversely impacts development of the heart. Past studies have focused on highly aggregated temporal levels of exposure during the pregnancy and have failed to account for anatomical similarities between the considered congenital heart defects. We introduce a multinomial probit model in the Bayesian setting that allows for joint identification of susceptible daily periods during pregnancy for 12 types of congenital heart defects with respect to maternal PM2.5 exposure. We apply the model to a dataset of mothers from the National Birth Defect Prevention Study where daily PM2.5 exposures from post-conception gestational weeks 2–8 are assigned using predictions from the downscaler pollution model. This approach is compared with two aggregated exposure models that define exposure as the average value over post-conception gestational weeks 2–8 and the average over individual weeks, respectively. Results suggest an association between increased PM2.5 exposure on post-conception gestational day 53 with the development of pulmonary valve stenosis and exposures during days 50 and 51 with tetralogy of Fallot. Significant associations are masked when using the aggregated exposure models. Simulation study results suggest that the findings are robust to multiple sources of error. The general form of the model allows for different exposures and health outcomes to be considered in future applications. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.