Volume 29, Issue 16 pp. 1661-1672
Research Article

Likelihood-based methods for estimating the association between a health outcome and left- or interval-censored longitudinal exposure data

Kathleen A. Wannemuehler

Corresponding Author

Kathleen A. Wannemuehler

Division of Foodborne, Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vectorborne and Enteric Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.

Division of Foodborne, Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vectorborne and Enteric Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
Robert H. Lyles

Robert H. Lyles

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, The Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Amita K. Manatunga

Amita K. Manatunga

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, The Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Metrecia L. Terrell

Metrecia L. Terrell

Department of Epidemiology, The Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Michele Marcus

Michele Marcus

Department of Epidemiology, The Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, The Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 June 2010
Citations: 2

This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A.

Abstract

The Michigan Female Health Study (MFHS) conducted research focusing on reproductive health outcomes among women exposed to polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs). In the work presented here, the available longitudinal serum PBB exposure measurements are used to obtain predictions of PBB exposure for specific time points of interest via random effects models. In a two-stage approach, a prediction of the PBB exposure is obtained and then used in a second-stage health outcome model. This paper illustrates how a unified approach, which links the exposure and outcome in a joint model, provides an efficient adjustment for covariate measurement error. We compare the use of empirical Bayes predictions in the two-stage approach with results from a joint modeling approach, with and without an adjustment for left- and interval-censored data. The unified approach with the adjustment for left- and interval-censored data resulted in little bias and near-nominal confidence interval coverage in both the logistic and linear model setting. Published in 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.