Environmental flow requirements of fish in Lesotho rivers using the DRIFT methodology
Corresponding Author
Angela H. Arthington
Co-operative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
Co-operative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.Search for more papers by this authorMark J. Kennard
Co-operative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorBradley J. Pusey
Co-operative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Angela H. Arthington
Co-operative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
Co-operative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.Search for more papers by this authorMark J. Kennard
Co-operative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorBradley J. Pusey
Co-operative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
DRIFT (Downstream Response to Imposed Flow Transformations) is a scenario-based environmental flow assessment methodology applied during impact studies associated with the Lesotho Highlands Water Project, Southern Africa. DRIFT offers a structured process for predicting the biophysical, social and economic consequences of altering a river's flow regime. The fish component of DRIFT provides a ten-step protocol designed to make such predictions using field data on a river's fish fauna linked to information on flow-related aspects of fish biology drawn from the literature and the knowledge base and professional experience of fish ecologists. A worked example of the methodology is presented based on a study site downstream from Katse Dam on the Malibamatso River, Lesotho, where the ecological consequences of four flow scenarios were evaluated. DRIFT and its fish component have emerged from studies in a semi-arid, developing region where unpredictable hydrological regimes and data scarcity constrain the prediction of ecological responses to flow regulation. Faced with similar information constraints, scientific uncertainty and limited windows of opportunity to guide water management, other countries have employed scientific panels to recommend environmental flows. DRIFT and its fish component compare favourably with recommended best practice for Australian scientific panel assessments of the flow requirements of river ecosystems. The risks associated with use of scientific panel approaches are discussed and minimum data sets and standards are recommended for the conduct of a DRIFT fish assessment. DRIFT and related frameworks represent the second level in a three-tiered hierarchy of environmental flow methods. They can provide environmental flow recommendations of far greater scientific resolution than hydrological methods by integrating many types of information on the responses of riverine biota to flow modifications. However, DRIFT should only be applied within an adaptive management framework where there is a genuine commitment to the generation and use of new knowledge derived from monitoring and research. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Anon. 1996. Expert Panel on Air Quality Standards. Nitrogen Dioxide. Department of Environment: London.
- Arthington AH. 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Holistic Methodologies. Occasional Paper 26/98. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation: Canberra.
- AH Arthington, R Lloyd (eds). 1998. Logan River Trial of the Building Block Methodology for Assessing Environmental Flow Requirements: Workshop Report. Centre for Catchment and In-Stream Research and Department of Natural Resources: Brisbane.
- AH Arthington, GC Long (eds). 1997. Logan River Trial of the Building Block Methodology for Assessing Environmental Flow Requirements: Background Papers. Centre for Catchment and In-Stream Research and Department of Natural Resources: Brisbane.
- Arthington AH, Pusey BJ. 1993. In-stream flow management in Australia: methods, deficiencies and future directions. Australian Biologist 6: 52–60.
- AH Arthington, JM Zalucki (eds). 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods. Occasional Paper 27/98. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation: Canberra.
- Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Pusey BJ, Bluhdorn DR, King JM, Day JA, Tharme RE, O'Keeffe JH. 1992. Development of an holistic approach for assessing environmental flow requirements of riverine ecosystems. In Proceedings of an International Seminar and Workshop on Water Allocation for the Environment, JJ Pigram, BP Hooper (eds). Centre for Water Policy Research, University of New England: Armidale, Australia.
- Arthington AH, Brizga SO, Kennard MJ. 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Best Practice Framework. Occasional Paper 25/98. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation: Canberra.
- Arthington AH, Brizga SO, Choy SC, Kennard MJ, Mackay SJ, McCosker RO, Ruffini JL, Zalucki JM. 2000. Environmental Flow Requirements of the Brisbane River Downstream from Wivenhoe Dam. South East. Queensland Water Corporation and Centre for Catchment and In-Stream Research: Brisbane.
- Bovee KD. 1982. A Guide to Stream Habitat Analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 21. FWS/OBS-82/26. US Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Services: Washington, DC.
- Bovee KD. 1986. Development of Habitat Suitability Criteria for Use in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 86(7). US Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, DC.
- Brizga SO. 2000. Burnett Basin Water Allocation Management Plan: Proposed Environmental Flow Performance Measures, Volumes 1 and 2. Department of Natural Resources: Brisbane.
- Brizga SO, Arthington AH, Pusey BJ, Kennard MJ, Mackay SJ, Werren GL, Craigie NM, Choy SJ. 2002. Benchmarking, a ‘top-down’ methodology for assessing environmental flows in Australian rivers. ENVIRO FLOWS 2002. Proceedings of the International Conference of Environmental Flows for River Systems, incorporating the 4th International Ecohydraulics Symposium. Southern Waters Ecological Research & Consulting (Pty) Ltd., Cape Town: South Africa.
- Brown CA, Sparks A, Howard G. 2000. Palmiet River Instream Flow Assessment: Instream Flow Requirement for the riverine ecosystem. In Proceedings of the IFR Workshop and Determination of Associated Dam Yields. Southern Waters Report No. G400-00-0499 to the South African Department of Water Affairs and Forestry: Pretoria, South Africa.
- Bunn SE, Arthington AH. 2002. Principles and ecological consequences of altered hydrological regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30: 492–507.
- Cambray JA. 1984. Early ontogeny of Labeo capensis (Pisces: Cyprinidae). South African Journal of Zoology 20: 190–196.
- Cottingham P, Hannan G, Hillman T, Koehn J, Metzling L, Roberts J, Rutherford I. 1991. Report of the Ovens Scientific Panel on the Environmental Condition and Flows in the Ovens River. Technical Report 9/2001. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology: Canberra.
- Cottingham P, Thoms MC, Quinn GP. 2002. Scientific panels and their use in environmental flow assessment in Australia. Australian Journal of Water Resources 5: 103–111.
10.1080/13241583.2002.11465196 Google Scholar
- Downes B, Barmuta L, Fairweather P, Faith DP, Keought MJ, Lake PS, Mapstone BD, Quinn GP. 2002. Monitoring Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Practice in Flowing Waters. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511542015 Google Scholar
- Dunbar MJ, Gustard A, Acreman M, Elliott CRN. 1998. Overseas Approaches to Setting River Flow Objectives. R&D Technical Report W6B(96)4. Institute of Hydrology: Wallingford.
- French TD, Chambers PA. 1997. Reducing flows in the Nechako River (British Columbia, Canada): potential response of the macrophyte community. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2247–2254.
- Gehrke PC, Brown P, Schiller CB, Moffatt DB, Bruce AM. 1995. River regulation and fish communities in the Murray-Darling River system, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11: 363–375.
- Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL. 1992. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. John Wiley: Chichester.
- Gore JA, Layzer JB, Russell IA. 1992. Non-traditional applications of in-stream flow techniques for conserving habitat of biota in the Sabie River of Southern Africa. In River Conservation and Management, PJ Boon, P Calow, GE Petts (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 161–178.
- Groshens TP, Orth DJ. 1994. Transferability of habitat suitability criteria for smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu. Rivers 4: 194–212.
- Hill MT, Platts S, Beschta RL. 1991. Ecological and geomorphological concepts for instream and out-of-channel flow requirements. Rivers 2: 198–210.
- Jones J, Hunter D. 1995. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal 311: 376–380.
- Jowett IG. 1997. Instream flow methods: a comparison of approaches. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13: 115–127.
- Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood-pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium (LARS), DP Dodge (ed.). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Special Publication 106: 110–127.
- Kennard MJ. 2000. Freshwater fish. In Burnett Basin WAMP: Current Environmental Conditions and Impacts of Water Resource Development, Volume II(b). S Brizga, A Arthington, S Choy, L Duivenvoorden, M Kennard, R Maynard, W Poplawski (eds). Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines: Brisbane; Appendix G.
- Kennard M, Arthington AH, Thompson C. 2000. Flow requirements of freshwater fish. In Environmental Flow Requirements of the Brisbane River Downstream from Wivenhoe Dam. South East Queensland Water Corporation and Centre for Catchment and In-Stream Research: Brisbane; 265–330.
- King J, Louw D. 1998. Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa using the Building Block Methodology. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 1: 109–124.
10.1080/14634989808656909 Google Scholar
- King JM, Tharme RE. 1994. Assessment of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology and Initial Development of Alternative Instream Flow Methodologies for South Africa. Water Research Commission Report No. 295/1/94. Water Research Commission: Pretoria, South Africa.
- King JM, Cambray JA, Dean Impson N. 1998. Linked effects of dam-released floods and water temperature on spawning of the Clanwilliam yellowfish Barbus capensis. Hydrobiologia 384: 245–265.
- JM King, RE Tharme, MS de Villiers (eds). 2000. Environmental Flow Assessments for Rivers: Manual for the Building Block Methodology. Water Research Commission Technology Transfer Report No. TT131/00. Water Research Commission: Pretoria, South Africa.
- King J, Brown C, Sabet H. 2003. A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 619–639.
- Loneragan NR, Bunn SE. 1999. River flows and estuarine ecosystems: implications for coastal fisheries from a review and a case study of the Logan River, southeast Queensland. Australian Journal of Ecology 24: 431–440.
- Metsi Consultants. 2000a. Consulting Services for the Establishment and Monitoring of the Instream Flow Requirements for River Courses Downstream of LHWP dams. IFR Methodology Report No. 648-F-03 (Volume 2) (authors Brown C, King J). Lesotho Highlands Development Authority Contract 648: Maseru, Lesotho.
- Metsi Consultants. 2000b. Consulting Services for the Establishment and Monitoring of the Instream Flow Requirements for River Courses Downstream of LHWP dams. Fish. Report No. 648-F-18 (authors Arthington A, Rall J, Kennard M). Lesotho Highlands Development Authority Contract 648: Maseru, Lesotho.
- National Health and Medical Research Council. 1994. General Guidelines for Medical Practitioners on Providing Information to Patients. National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra.
- Niehaus BH, Steyn GJ, Rall JL. 1997. Habitat preference and population structure of the rock catfish (Austroglanis sclateri) in the Senqunyane River, Lesotho. Water South Africa 23: 405–410.
- O'Brien JS. 1987. A case study of minimum streamflow for fishery habitat in the Yampa River. In Sediment Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers, CR Thorne, JC Bathurst, RD Hey (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 921–946.
- Pettit NE, Froend RH, Davies PM. 2001. Identifying the natural flow regime and the relationship with riparian vegetation for two contrasting Western Australian rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 201–215.
10.1002/rrr.624 Google Scholar
- Petts GE, Maddock I. 1994. Flow allocation for in-river needs. In River Restoration, G Petts, P Calow (eds). Blackwell Science: Oxford; 60–79.
- Poff NL, Ward JV. 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of stream flow patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46: 1805–1818.
- Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KI, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47: 769–784.
- Puckridge JT, Sheldon F, Walker KF, Boulton AJ. 1998. Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers. Marine and Freshwater Research 49: 55–72.
- Pusey BJ. 1998. Methods addressing the flow requirements of fish. In Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods, AH Arthington, JM Zalucki (eds). Occasional Paper 27/98. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation: Canberra; 64–103.
- Pusey BJ. 2001. Fish. Pioneer Valley Water Resource Plan: Current Environmental Condition and Impacts of Existing Water Resource Development. Volume II. Queensland Government Natural Resources and Mines: Brisbane.
- Pusey BJ, Arthington AH, Read MG. 1995a. Species richness and spatial variation in fish assemblage structure in two rivers of the Wet Tropics of Northern Queensland, Australia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42: 181–199.
- Pusey BJ, Read MG, Arthington AH. 1995b. The feeding ecology of freshwater fishes in two rivers of the Australian Wet Tropics. Environmental Biology of Fishes 43: 85–103.
- Pusey BJ, Arthington AH, Read MG. 1998a. Freshwater fishes of the Burdekin River, Australia: biogeography, history and spatial variation in assemblage structure. Environmental Biology of Fishes 53: 303–318.
- Pusey BJ, Kennard MJ, Arthur JM, Arthington AH. 1998b. Quantitative sampling of stream fish assemblages: single- versus multiple pass electrofishing. Australian Journal of Ecology 23: 365–374.
- Pusey BJ, Kennard MJ, Arthington AH. 2000. Discharge variability and the development of predictive models relating stream fish assemblage structure to habitat in north-eastern Australia. Ecology of Freshwater Fishes 9: 30–50.
- Pusey BJ, Arthington AH, Bird J, Close PG. 2001a. Reproduction in three species of rainbowfishes (Melanotaeniidae) from rainforest streams in north-eastern Queensland, Australia. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 10: 75–87.
- Pusey BJ, Close PG, Arthington AH, Bird J. 2001b. Larval fishes in north-eastern Australian rainforest streams: patterns of abundance and microhabitat use. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 110: 27–46.
- Rall JL. 1999. Development of a conservation program on Pseudobarbus quathlambae in the catchment area of phase 1B of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. PhD Thesis, Rand Afrikaans University.
- Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10: 1–12.
- Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP. 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37: 231–249.
- Roe E, Van Eeten M. 2001. Threshold-based resource management: a framework for comprehensive ecosystem management. Environmental Management 27: 195–214.
- Skelton PH. 1993. A Complete Guide to Freshwater Fishes of Southern Africa. Southern Book Publishers: Halfway House.
- Stalnaker CB, Arnette SC. 1976. Methodologies for the Determination of Stream Resource Flow Requirements: An Assessment. US Fish and Wildlife Services, Office of Biological Sciences Western Water Association.
- Stalnaker C, Lamb BL, Henriksen J, Bovee K, Bartholow J. 1994. The Instream Incremental Methodology: A Primer for IFIM. Biological Report 29. US Department of the Interior, National Biological Service: Washington, DC.
- Tennant DL. 1976. Instream flow requirements for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1: 6–10.
10.1577/1548-8446(1976)001<0006:IFRFFW>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
- Tharme RE. 1996. Review of the International Methodologies for the Quantification of the Instream Flow Requirements of Rivers. Report to the South African Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Freshwater Ecology Unit, University of Cape Town: Rondebosch.
- Tharme RE. 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications.
- Thoms MC, Sheldon F, Roberts J, Harris J, Hillman TJ. 1996. Scientific Panel Assessment of Environmental Flows for the Barwon-Darling River. New South Wales Department of Land and Water Conservation: Sydney.
- Walker KF, Thoms MC. 1993. Environmental effects of flow regulation on the River Murray, South Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 8: 103–119.
- Walters CJ. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. MacMillan Publishing: New York.
- Ward JV, Standford JA. 1995. Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 11: 105–119.
- Williamson SC, Bartholow JM, Stalnaker CB. 1993. Conceptual model for quantifying pre-smolt production from flow-dependent physical habitat and water temperature. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 8: 15–28.