Volume 5, Issue 4 pp. 401-415
Article
Full Access

Stable versus partial response in advanced prostate cancer

Nelson H. Slack

Nelson H. Slack

National Prostatic Cancer Project, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Mark F. Brady

Mark F. Brady

National Prostatic Cancer Project, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Gerald P. Murphy MD

Corresponding Author

Gerald P. Murphy MD

National Prostatic Cancer Project, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, New York

Roswell Park Memorial Institute, 666 Elm Street, Buffalo, NY 14263Search for more papers by this author
First published: 1984
Citations: 19

Abstract

Stable response to therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer, as experienced in clinical trials of the National Prostatic Cancer Project (NPCP), has been reexamined. Data from ten complete trials totaling over 1,300 patients have been examined for survival patterns within categories of response to therapy. Survival patterns, both for all patients and for those alive at 12 weeks, were significantly poorer for patients categorized as progressors after 12 weeks on treatment than for those categorized as stable or as partial regressions. Furthermore, comparisons of survival patterns for those patients categorized as stable or partial regression revealed no statistically significant differences between them. The similarity of survival for the stable and partial regression categories indicates that the stable category represents more than a segment of the population with slowly progressing disease and can be taken as an indicator of response to therapy.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.