Volume 83, Issue 1 pp. 64-70
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Time to second biochemical recurrence as a prognostic indicator in postprostatectomy patients who undergo salvage radiation therapy: An RTOG 9601 based post hoc analysis

Emily Chan Brodowsky MD

Emily Chan Brodowsky MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Akshay Sood MD

Akshay Sood MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mohit Butaney MD

Mohit Butaney MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sami E. Majdalany MD

Sami E. Majdalany MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alex Stephens MS

Alex Stephens MS

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas Corsi BS

Nicholas Corsi BS

Division of Medicine, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Austin J. Piontkowski BS

Austin J. Piontkowski BS

Division of Medicine, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ivan Rakic BS

Ivan Rakic BS

Division of Medicine, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Marcus Jamil MD

Marcus Jamil MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Deepansh Dalela MD

Deepansh Dalela MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
James O. Peabody MD

James O. Peabody MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Craig G. Rogers MD

Craig G. Rogers MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Firas Abdollah MD

Corresponding Author

Firas Abdollah MD

Department of Urology, VCORE—Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Correspondence Firas Abdollah, MD, FEBU, Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute (VUI), VUI Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Wayne State University, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 September 2022
Citations: 1

Abstract

Introduction and Objective

The prognostic significance of a “second” biochemical recurrence (sBCR) after salvage radiation therapy (sRT) with/without hormonal therapy following primary radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer has not been examined. We hypothesized that a shorter time to sBCR will be associated with worse cancer control outcomes.

Methods

The RTOG 9601 study included 760 patients with tumor stage pT2/T3, pN0, who had either persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) postradical prostatectomy or developed subsequent biochemical recurrence with PSA levels between 0.2 and 4.0 ng/ml. All patients received sRT (with or without 2 years of Bicalutamide) from 1998 to 2015. For our study, we focused on 421 patients who had sBCR after sRT—which was defined as a PSA increase of at least 0.3 ng/ml over the first nadir. Patients were divided into two categories: early sBCR (n = 210) and late sBCR (n = 211) using median time to sBCR (3.51 years). All patients who experienced sBCR received salvage hormonal therapy. Competing-risk analysis was used to examine the impact of early versus late sBCR on prostate cancer specific mortality (CSM), after accounting for available covariates.

Results

The majority of patients were age 60 years or older (75.8%), had pT3 disease (74.8%), and Gleason score 7 (75.2%). Overall, 13.8% had persistent PSA initially after surgery. At 10 years, starting at the time of sBCR, CSM rate was 31.3% in the early sBCR group versus 20.0% in the late sBCR group. In competing-risk analysis, time to sBCR was an independent predictor of CSM, where patients with early sBCR had 1.7-fold higher CSM risk (p = 0.026) than their counterparts with late sBCR.

Conclusions

Time to sBCR after sRT (with or without concomitant Bicalutamide) is a significant predictor of CSM following initial radical prostatectomy. This information can be used to guide subsequent treatments, and to counsel patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Firas Abdollah is an advisor/consultant of Decipher Biosciences.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.