Volume 20, Issue 11 pp. 1150-1158
Original Report

Validation of ICD-9-CM codes to identify gastrointestinal perforation events in administrative claims data among hospitalized rheumatoid arthritis patients

Jeffrey R. Curtis

Corresponding Author

Jeffrey R. Curtis

UAB, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA

J. R. Curtis, UAB, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, FOT 805D, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Shih-Yin Chen

Shih-Yin Chen

United BioSource Corporation, Lexington, MA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Winifred Werther

Winifred Werther

Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ani John

Ani John

Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Johnson

David A. Johnson

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 August 2011
Citations: 19

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To validate, using physician review of abstracted medical chart data as a gold standard, a claims-based algorithm developed to identify gastrointestinal (GI) perforation cases among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods

Patients with established RA, aged 18 years or older with hospital admissions between January 2004 and September 2009, were selected from a large US-hospital-based database. An algorithm with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes for GI perforation and combinations of GI-related diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) procedure codes for relevant GI surgeries was used to identify potential GI perforation cases. Two senior experienced specialist physicians independently reviewed abstracted chart data and classified cases as confirmed or unconfirmed GI perforations. Positive predictive values (PPVs) to identify confirmed GI perforation were calculated and stratified by upper versus lower GI tract.

Results

Overall, 86 of 92 GI perforation cases were confirmed, yielding an overall PPV of 94% (95%confidence interval [CI] = 86%–98%). PPV was 100% (95%CI = 100%–100%) for upper GI perforation (esophagus, stomach) and 91% (95%CI = 90%–97%) for lower GI perforation (small intestine, PPV = 100%; large intestine, PPV = 94%; unspecified lower GI, PPV = 89%).

Conclusions

This algorithm, consisting of a combination of ICD-9-CM diagnosis and CPT-4 codes, could be used in future safety studies to evaluate GI perforation risk factors in RA patients. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.