Volume 69, Issue 12 e29996
ONCOLOGY: RESEARCH ARTICLE

Failure modes and effects analysis of pediatric I-131 MIBG therapy: Program design and potential pitfalls

Nichole M. Maughan

Corresponding Author

Nichole M. Maughan

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Correspondence

Nichole M. Maughan, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Pl, Campus Box 8224, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jose L. Garcia-Ramirez

Jose L. Garcia-Ramirez

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Frederick S Huang

Frederick S Huang

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel N. Willis

Daniel N. Willis

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Amir Iravani

Amir Iravani

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Maxwell Amurao

Maxwell Amurao

Division of Radiation Safety, Department of Environmental Health and Safety, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David Luechtefeld

David Luechtefeld

Division of Radiation Safety, Department of Environmental Health and Safety, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joyce C. Mhlanga

Joyce C. Mhlanga

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephanie M. Perkins

Stephanie M. Perkins

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jacqueline E. Zoberi

Jacqueline E. Zoberi

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 September 2022
Citations: 2

This work has been previously published as a meeting abstract: “Embracing Inpatient Radiopharmaceutical Therapies in Radiation Oncology: An Example With Commissioning Pediatric I-131 MIBG Therapy,” ASTRO 2021 Annual Meeting, October 2021, https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(21)02303-8/fulltext

Abstract

Background

There is growing interest among pediatric institutions for implementing iodine-131 (I-131) meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) therapy for treating children with high-risk neuroblastoma. Due to regulations on the medical use of radioactive material (RAM), and the complexity and safety risks associated with the procedure, a multidisciplinary team involving radiation therapy/safety experts is required. Here, we describe methods for implementing pediatric I-131 MIBG therapy and evaluate our program's robustness via failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA).

Methods

We formed a multidisciplinary team, involving pediatric oncology, radiation oncology, and radiation safety staff. To evaluate the robustness of the therapy workflow and quantitatively assess potential safety risks, an FMEA was performed. Failure modes were scored (1–10) for their risk of occurrence (O), severity (S), and being undetected (D). Risk priority number (RPN) was calculated from a product of these scores and used to identify high-risk failure modes.

Results

A total of 176 failure modes were identified and scored. The majority (94%) of failure modes scored low (RPN <100). The highest risk failure modes were related to training and to drug-infusion procedures, with the highest S scores being (a) caregivers did not understand radiation safety training (O = 5.5, S = 7, D = 5.5, RPN = 212); (b) infusion training of staff was inadequate (O = 5, S = 8, D = 5, RPN = 200); and (c) air in intravenous lines/not monitoring for air in lines (O = 4.5, S = 8, D = 5, RPN = 180).

Conclusion

Through use of FMEA methodology, we successfully identified multiple potential points of failure that have allowed us to proactively mitigate risks when implementing a pediatric MIBG program.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

This work was not supported by any grants. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.