Volume 60, Issue 4 pp. 611-615
Research Article

Clinical features and outcomes in patients with secondary Ewing sarcoma

Mark A. Applebaum MD

Mark A. Applebaum MD

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Goldsby MD

Robert Goldsby MD

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California

Search for more papers by this author
John Neuhaus PhD

John Neuhaus PhD

Department of Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California

Search for more papers by this author
Steven G. DuBois MD

Corresponding Author

Steven G. DuBois MD

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California

Department of Pediatrics, UCSF School of Medicine, 505 Parnassus Avenue, M646 San Francisco, CA 94143-0106.===Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 July 2012
Citations: 23

Conflict of interest: Nothing to declare.

The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Abstract

Background

Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is rarely diagnosed as a second malignancy. We sought to describe a cohort of patients with secondary EWS and investigate if patient characteristics and survival differ between patients with secondary and primary EWS.

Procedure

Patients with EWS or peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database from 1973 to 2008 were evaluated based on primary or secondary tumor sequence. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods and evaluated using the log-rank test. Competing risk analysis was used to describe risk of death due to malignancy rather than other causes.

Results

Fifty-eight cases of secondary EWS were reported, accounting for 2.1% of all EWS cases. The median latency from primary malignancy to secondary EWS was 64 months (range 1–282 months). 12.1% of patients with secondary EWS received radiation to the site of secondary tumor during therapy for their primary malignancy. Patients with secondary EWS were more likely to have axial tumors (77.4% vs. 62.5%; P = 0.03) and smaller tumors (75.0% vs. 48.2% <8 cm; P = 0.001). Five-year overall survival from diagnosis was inferior for patients with secondary compared to primary EWS (34.3% vs. 52.2%; P = 0.002). However, patients with secondary tumors were less likely than those with primary EWS to die from their malignancy [hazard ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23–0.85].

Conclusions

Secondary EWS accounts for a minority of cases of EWS. Tumor size and site and patient survival differ among patients with primary and secondary EWS. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013; 60: 611–615. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.