Volume 60, Issue 1 pp. 41-44
Research Article

Chemotherapy compliance in patients with osteosarcoma

Jyoti Bajpai MD, DM

Corresponding Author

Jyoti Bajpai MD, DM

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Cancer Center, Mumbai 400012, India.===Search for more papers by this author
Ajay Puri MS

Ajay Puri MS

Department of Surgical Oncology (Bone and Soft Tissue), Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Kajal Shah MD

Kajal Shah MD

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Deepa Susan MD

Deepa Susan MD

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Nirmala Jambhekar MD

Nirmala Jambhekar MD

Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Bharat Rekhi MD

Bharat Rekhi MD

Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Saral Desai MD

Saral Desai MD

Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Ashish Gulia MS

Ashish Gulia MS

Department of Surgical Oncology (Bone and Soft Tissue), Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Sudeep Gupta DM

Sudeep Gupta DM

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 April 2012
Citations: 25

Nothing to disclose i.e. no conflict of interest

Abstract

Purpose

Histological response (HR) to neoadjuvant-chemotherapy (NACT) is considered as a robust prognostic marker in treated osteosarcomas. Chemotherapy compliance can affect both, dose intensity and density and may affect the final outcome in these cases. This vital aspect has been inadequately addressed and therefore merits further investigation.

Method

A retrospective study of NACT-treated osteosarcoma patients, during the year 2010 was conducted. Compliance was defined as receipt of planned cycles of chemotherapy in the planned doses, within the planned duration or up to 25% additional time. HR was assessed by grading for histological necrosis (HN). Good responders (GR) included those with tumors showing ≥90% HN.

Results

Of 124 patients, 115 were analyzed for post-NACT HR. Of the 73 (64%) compliant patients, 47 were GR and of the 42 (36%) non-compliant patients, 18 were GR. There was significant association between GR and compliance (P = 0.031). However, at a median follow-up of 7.9 months, there was no significant difference in survival between the noncompliant versus compliant group. Non-compliance was justifiable in 26 patients and not justifiable in 16 patients. Using univariate analysis, T-size, pain, performance status, albumin, LDH, and education were identified as significant factors, while in multivariate analysis, only poor performance status was identified as an independent variable for non-compliance.

Conclusions

Two-thirds patients were found to be compliant with NACT. There was a significant association between GR and compliant patients. Significant correlation between compliance and survival may be established with a longer follow-up particularly since “good necrosis” is generally predictive of good survival. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013; 60: 41–44. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.