Volume 45, Issue 7 pp. 920-924
Research Article

Mutation analysis of SBDS in pediatric acute myeloblastic leukemia

Fidel Majeed MSc

Fidel Majeed MSc

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Marrow Failure and Myelodysplasia Program, Immunity Infection Injury and Repair Programme, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Sergiy Jadko PhD

Sergiy Jadko PhD

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Marrow Failure and Myelodysplasia Program, Immunity Infection Injury and Repair Programme, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Melvin H. Freedman MD, FRCP(C)

Melvin H. Freedman MD, FRCP(C)

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Marrow Failure and Myelodysplasia Program, Immunity Infection Injury and Repair Programme, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Yigal Dror MD

Corresponding Author

Yigal Dror MD

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Marrow Failure and Myelodysplasia Program, Immunity Infection Injury and Repair Programme, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ont., Canada M5G 1X8.===Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 July 2005
Citations: 17

Abstract

Background

Shwachman–Diamond syndrome (SDS) is associated with a high risk of myelodysplasia, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and chromosome 7 abnormalities. Ninety percent of SDS patients have mutations in SBDS on 7q11. Herein, we studied the role of genetic alterations in SBDS in AML.

Procedure

DNA was extracted from marrows of SDS patients with AML, as well as from children with de novo AML. Direct sequencing of PCR amplified genomic DNA was performed using specific primers flanking each exon. To study whether SBDS heterozygosity confers a risk for MDS/AML, data on family members of SDS patients on the Canadian Inherited Marrow Failure Registry (CIMFR) was analyzed.

Results

Of two SDS patients with SDS/AML one was homozygous 258 + 2T > C, and one was compound heterozygous 183-184TA > CT/258 + 2T > C. To determine whether a subset of patients with SDS can present with AML, we analyzed 48 AML samples at remission, but no mutations were identified. To address whether acquired mutated SBDS gene is associated with leukemic transformation in de novo AML, we analyzed 77 AML samples at diagnosis or relapse (4 with -7 and 7q-) for SBDS mutations; no alterations were detected. Also, among the relatives of an SDS patient cohort on the registry no cases of MDS/AML were reported.

Conclusions

Common mutations occurred in our SDS patients who develop AML, and thus, AML is not confined to a rare genetic subgroup of SDS. Newly diagnosed patients with AML are unlikely to have an underlying undiagnosed SDS. Acquired SBDS gene mutations also would appear unlikely to play a mechanistic role in de novo AML, and might not be involved in the pathogenesis of chromosome 7 abnormalities as well. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.