Locking-Free Mixed Interior Penalty DG Methods for the Total Pressure-Formulation of the Biot-Brinkman Model in Porous Media
Xianying Cui
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wenjing Yan
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Correspondence:
Wenjing Yan ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorFeifei Jing
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
Search for more papers by this authorRui Li
School of Mathematics and Information Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
Search for more papers by this authorXianying Cui
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wenjing Yan
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
Correspondence:
Wenjing Yan ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorFeifei Jing
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
Search for more papers by this authorRui Li
School of Mathematics and Information Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
This work is devoted to overcome the locking phenomenon for the Biot-Brinkman model, which describes the interaction between the deformation of a fluid-saturated porous medium and viscous fluid flow. By introducing the total pressure in the Biot-Brinkman equations, a four-field formulation is derived as the target model. Well-posedness is followed independent of the material parameters. The mixed interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin (IPDG) methods are used to derive stable numerical solutions. Error estimates in both –norm and energy norm are established, which show optimum for the SIPG scheme, and achieve parameter robustness in the case of . Numerical examples are provided to verify the accuracy and stability, as well as locking-free of the proposed mixed DG methods.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1A. H. D. Cheng, Poroelasticity, vol. 27 (Springer International Publishing, 2016).
10.1007/978-3-319-25202-5 Google Scholar
- 2R. Caraballo, C. W. In, A. F. Martín, and R. Ruiz-Baier, “Robust Finite Element Methods and Solvers for the Biot–Brinkman Equations in Vorticity Form,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 40, no. 3 (2024): e23083.
- 3Q. Hong, J. Kraus, M. Kuchta, M. Lymbery, K.-A. Mardal, and M. E. Rognes, “Robust Approximation of Generalized Biot-Brinkman Problems,” Journal of Scientific Computing 93 (2022): 77.
- 4H. Wang, Theory of Linear Poroelasticity With Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, 2000).
- 5K. Terzaghi, Theoretical Soil Mechanics (Wiley, 1943).
10.1002/9780470172766 Google Scholar
- 6M. A. Biot, “Theory of Elasticity and Consolidation for a Porous Anisotropic Solid,” Journal of Applied Physics 26, no. 2 (1955): 82–185.
- 7H. C. Brinkman, “A Calculation of the Viscous Force Exerted by a Flowing Fluid on a Dense Swarm of Particles,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 1 (1949): 27–34.
10.1007/BF02120313 Google Scholar
- 8F. Ben-Hatira, K. Saidane, and A. Mrabet, “A Finite Element Modeling of the Human Lumbar Unit Including the Spinal Cord,” Journal of Biomedical Engineering 5 (2012): 146–152.
- 9B. Burtschell, P. Moireau, and D. Chapelle, “Numerical Analysis for an Energy-Stable Total Discretization of a Poromechanics Model With Inf-Sup Stability,” Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series 35, no.1 (2019): 28–53.
10.1007/s10255-019-0799-5 Google Scholar
- 10N. Barnafi, P. Zunino, L. Dedè, and A. Quarteroni, “Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Approximation of a General Linearized Poro-Hyperelastic Model,” Computers & Mathematics With Applications 91 (2021): 202–228.
- 11A. Armiti-Juber and C. Rohde, “On Darcy- and Brinkman-Type Models for Two-Phase Flow in Asymptotically Flat Domains,” Computational Geosciences 23 (2019): 285–303.
- 12F. J. Carrillo and I. C. Bourg, “A Darcy-Brinkman-Biot Approach to Modeling the Hydrology and Mechanics of Porous Media Containing Macropores and Deformable Microporous Regions,” Water Resources Research 55, no.10 (2019): 8096–8121.
10.1029/2019WR024712 Google Scholar
- 13P. S. Vassilevski and U. Villa, “A Mixed Formulation for the Brinkman Problem,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 52, no.1 (2014): 258–281.
10.1137/120884109 Google Scholar
- 14P. J. Phillips and M. F. Wheeler, “A Coupling of Mixed and Discontinuous Galerkin Finite-Element Methods for Poroelasticity,” Computational Geosciences 12 (2008): 417–435.
- 15P. J. Phillips and M. F. Wheeler, “Overcoming the Problem of Locking in Linear Elasticity and Poroelasticity: An Heuristic Approach,” Computational Geosciences 13 (2009): 5–12.
- 16J. J. Lee, “Robust Error Analysis of Coupled Mixed Methods for Biot's Consolidation Model,” Journal of Scientific Computing 69 (2016): 610–632.
- 17J. J. Lee, K.-A. Mardal, and R. Winther, “Parameter-Robust Discretization and Preconditioning of Biot's Consolidation Model,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 39, no.1 (2017): A1–A24.
10.1137/15M1029473 Google Scholar
- 18J. J. Lee, E. Piersanti, K.-A. Mardal, and M. E. Rognes, “A Mixed Finite Element Method for Nearly Incompressible Multiple-Network Poroelasticity,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 41, no.2 (2019): A722–A747.
10.1137/18M1182395 Google Scholar
- 19Z. Ge and M. Ma, “Multiphysics Discontinuous Galerkin Method for a Poroelasticity Model,” Applied Mathematics and Computation 301 (2017): 78–94.
- 20A. Cesmelioglu, J. J. Lee, and S. Rhebergen, “Analysis of an Embedded–Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Biot's Consolidation Model,” Journal of Scientific Computing 97 (2023): 60.
- 21G. Fu, “A High-Order HDG Method for the Biot's Consolidation Model,” Computers & Mathematics With Applications 77, no.1 (2019): 237–252.
10.1016/j.camwa.2018.09.029 Google Scholar
- 22J. Kraus, P. L. Lederer, M. Lymbery, K. Osthues, and J. Schöberl, “Hybridized Discontinuous Galerkin/Hybrid Mixed Methods for a Multiple Network Poroelasticity Model With Application in Biomechanics,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 45, no.6 (2023): B802–B827.
10.1137/22M149764X Google Scholar
- 23G. Aguilar, F. Gaspar, F. Lisbona, and C. Rodrigo, “Numerical Stabilization of Biot's Consolidation Model by a Perturbation on the Flow Equation,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 75, no.11 (2008): 1282–1300.
10.1002/nme.2295 Google Scholar
- 24L. Berger, R. Bordas, D. Kay, and S. Tavener, “Stabilized Lowest-Order Finite Element Approximation for Linear Three-Field Poroelasticity,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 37, no.5 (2015): A2222–A2245.
10.1137/15M1009822 Google Scholar
- 25T. Kadeethum, S. Lee, and H. M. Nick, “Finite Element Solvers for Biot's Poroelasticity Equations in Porous Media,” Mathematical Geosciences 52 (2020): 977–1015.
- 26I. Babuka and M. Suri, “Locking Effects in the Finite Element Approximation of Elasticity Problems,” Numerische Mathematik 62 (1992): 439–463.
10.1007/BF01396238 Google Scholar
- 27S. Yi, “A Study of Two Modes of Locking in Poroelasticity,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 55, no.4 (2017): 1915–1936.
10.1137/16M1056109 Google Scholar
- 28J. B. Haga, H. Osnes, and H. P. Langtangen, “On the Causes of Pressure Oscillations in Low-Permeable and Low-Compressible Porous Media,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 36, no.12 (2012): 1507–1522.
10.1002/nag.1062 Google Scholar
- 29D. S. Malkus and T. J. R. Hughes, “Mixed Finite Element Methods-Reduced and Selective Integration Techniques: A Unification of Concepts,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 15, no.1 (1978): 63–81.
10.1016/0045-7825(78)90005-1 Google Scholar
- 30D. Boffi, F. Brezzi, and M. Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications, vol. 44 (Springer, 2013).
10.1007/978-3-642-36519-5 Google Scholar
- 31D. Braess, “Stability of Saddle Point Problems With Penalty,” ESAIM. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 30, no.6 (1996): 731–742.
10.1051/m2an/1996300607311 Google Scholar
- 32B. Gómez-Vargas, K.-A. Mardal, R. Ruiz-Baier, and V. Vinje, “Twofold Saddle-Point Formulation of Biot Poroelasticity With Stress-Dependent Diffusion,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 61, no.3 (2023): 1449–1481.
10.1137/21M1449695 Google Scholar
- 33Q. Hong, J. Kraus, M. Lymbery, and F. Philo, “A New Practical Framework for the Stability Analysis of Perturbed Saddle-Point Problems and Applications,” Mathematics of Computation 92 (2022): 607–634.
- 34W. Zulehner, “Nonstandard Norms and Robust Estimates for Saddle Point Problems,” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 32, no.2 (2011): 536–560.
10.1137/100814767 Google Scholar
- 35L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, vol. 19 (American Mathematical Society, 2022).
- 36D. A. Di Pietro and A. Ern, Mathematical Aspects of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods, vol. 69 (Springer, Science & Business Media, 2011).
- 37C. Bacuta and J. H. Bramble, “Regularity Estimates for Solutions of the Equations of Linear Elasticity in Convex Plane Polygonal Domains,” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik Und Physik 54 (2003): 874–878.
- 38D. N. Arnold, L. R. Scott, and M. Vogelius, “Regular Inversion of the Divergence Operator With Dirichlet Boundary Conditions on Polygon,” Annali Della Scuola Normale Superiore Di Pisa, Classe Di Scienze 15, no.2 (1988): 169–192.
- 39B. Rivière, Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Elliptic and Parabolic Equations: Theory and Implementation (SIAM, 2008).
10.1137/1.9780898717440 Google Scholar