Interval spectral stochastic finite element analysis of structures with aggregation of random field and bounded parameters
Duy Minh Do
Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety (CIES), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wei Gao
Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety (CIES), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Correspondence to: Wei Gao, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales.
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] (D.M. Do); [email protected] (W. Gao)
Search for more papers by this authorChongmin Song
Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety (CIES), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorMichael Beer
Institute for Computer Science in Civil Engineering, Leibniz University Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorDuy Minh Do
Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety (CIES), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wei Gao
Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety (CIES), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Correspondence to: Wei Gao, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales.
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] (D.M. Do); [email protected] (W. Gao)
Search for more papers by this authorChongmin Song
Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety (CIES), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorMichael Beer
Institute for Computer Science in Civil Engineering, Leibniz University Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This paper presents the study on non-deterministic problems of structures with a mixture of random field and interval material properties under uncertain-but-bounded forces. Probabilistic framework is extended to handle the mixed uncertainties from structural parameters and loads by incorporating interval algorithms into spectral stochastic finite element method. Random interval formulations are developed based on K–L expansion and polynomial chaos accommodating the random field Young's modulus, interval Poisson's ratios and bounded applied forces. Numerical characteristics including mean value and standard deviation of the interval random structural responses are consequently obtained as intervals rather than deterministic values. The randomised low-discrepancy sequences initialized particles and high-order nonlinear inertia weight with multi-dimensional parameters are employed to determine the change ranges of statistical moments of the random interval structural responses. The bounded probability density and cumulative distribution of the interval random response are then visualised. The feasibility, efficiency and usefulness of the proposed interval spectral stochastic finite element method are illustrated by three numerical examples. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- 1Elishakoff I, Ren YJ, Shinozuka M. Some critical observations and attendant new results in the finite element method for stochastic problems. Chaos Some critical Solitons & Fractals 1996; 7: 597–609.
- 2Elishakoff I, Ren Y. The bird's eye view on finite element method for structures with large stochastic variations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 168: 51–61.
- 3Schueller GI. Computational stochastic mechanics – recent advances. Computers & Structures 2001; 79: 2225–2234.
- 4Elishakoff I, Ren Y. Finite Element Methods for Structures with Large Stochastic Variations. Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, 2003.
10.1093/oso/9780198526315.001.0001 Google Scholar
- 5Oden JT, Belytschko T, Babuska V, Hughes TJR. Research directions in computational mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2003; 192: 913–22.
- 6Matthies HG, Brenner CE, Bucher CG, Soares CG. Uncertainties in probabilistic numerical analysis of structures and solids – stochastic finite elements. Structural Safety 1997; 19: 283–336.
- 7Ghanem RG, Spanos PD. Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer - Verlag New York Inc.: Mineola, New York, USA, 1991.
10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6 Google Scholar
- 8Elishakoff I, Ren YJ, Shinozuka M. Conditional simulation of non-Gaussian random fields. Engineering Structures 1994; 16: 558–63.
- 9Ghanem RG, Kruger RM. Numerical solution of spectral stochastic finite element systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 129: 289–303.
- 10Sudret B, Der Kiureghian A. Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: a state-of-the-art report. In No. UCB/SEMM-2000/08 ed, University of California, Berkeley, USA, 2000.
- 11Anders M, Hori M. Three-dimensional stochastic finite element method for elasto-plastic bodies. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 51: 449–78.
- 12Huang SP, Quek ST, Phoon KK. Convergence study of the truncated Karhunen–Loeve expansion for simulation of stochastic processes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 52: 1029–43.
- 13Chung DB, Gutierrez MA, Graham-Brady LL, Lingen FJ. Efficient numerical strategies for spectral stochastic finite element models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 64: 1334–49.
- 14Eiermann M, Ernst O, Ullmann E. Computational aspects of the stochastic finite element method. Computing and Visualization in Science 2007; 10: 3–15.
10.1007/s00791-006-0047-4 Google Scholar
- 15Stefanou G, Papadrakakis M. Assessment of spectral representation and Karhunen–Loeve expansion methods for the simulation of Gaussian stochastic fields. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2007; 196: 2465–77.
- 16Spanos PD, Beer M, Red-Horse J. Karhunen-loeve expansion of stochastic processes with a modified exponential covariance kernel. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-Asce 2007; 133: 773–9.
- 17Ngah MF, Young A. Application of the spectral stochastic finite element method for performance prediction of composite structures. Composite Structures 2007; 78: 447–56.
- 18Stefanou G. The stochastic finite element method: past, present and future. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2009; 198: 1031–51.
- 19Spanos PD, Zeldin BA. Monte carlo treatment of random fields: a broad perspective. Applied Mechanics Reviews 1998; 51: 219–37.
10.1115/1.3098999 Google Scholar
- 20Spanos PD, Zeldin BA. Galerkin sampling method for stochastic mechanics problems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-Asce 1994; 120: 1091–106.
- 21Ghanem R. Stochastic finite elements with multiple random non-Gaussian properties. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1999; 125: 26–40.
- 22Graham LL, Deodatis G. Response and eigenvalue analysis of stochastic finite element systems with multiple correlated material and geometric properties. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2001; 16: 11–29.
- 23Stefanou G, Papadrakakis M. Stochastic finite element analysis of shells with combined random material and geometric properties. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193: 139–60.
- 24Chen N-Z, Guedes Soares C. Spectral stochastic finite element analysis for laminated composite plates. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197: 4830–9.
- 25Moens D, Vandepitte D. A survey of non-probabilistic uncertainty treatment in finite element analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194: 1527–55.
- 26Beer M, Ferson S, Kreinovich V. Imprecise probabilities in engineering analyses. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2013; 37: 4–29.
- 27Schenk CA, Schueller GI. Uncertainty Assessment of Large Finite Element Systems, Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; 1–165.
10.1007/11673941_1 Google Scholar
- 28Elishakoff I. Probabilistic Methods in the Theory of Structures. Wiley: New York, 1983.
- 29Beck JL. Bayesian system identification based on probability logic. Structural Control & Health Monitoring 2010; 17: 825–47.
- 30Papadimitriou C, Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS. Updating robust reliability using structural test data. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2001; 16: 103–13.
- 31Jaynes ET, Bretthorst GL. Probability theory : the logic of science. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, New York NY, 2003.
- 32Au SK. Connecting Bayesian and frequentist quantification of parameter uncertainty in system identification. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2012; 29: 328–42.
- 33Yan W-J, Katafygiotis LS. A novel Bayesian approach for structural model updating utilizing statistical modal information from multiple setups. Structural Safety 2015; 52: 260–71.
- 34Alvarez DA, Hurtado JE. An efficient method for the estimation of structural reliability intervals with random sets, dependence modeling and uncertain inputs. Computers & Structures 2014; 142: 54–63.
- 35de Angelis M, Patelli E, Beer M. Advanced line sampling for efficient robust reliability analysis. Structural Safety 2015; 52: 170–82.
- 36Beer M, Kreinovich V. Interval or moments: which carry more information?Soft Computing 2013; 17: 1319–27.
- 37Moore RE. Interval Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs N.J., 1966.
- 38Möller B, Beer M. Fuzzy Randomness: Uncertainty in Civil Engineering and Computational Mechanics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Heidelberg, Germany, 2004.
10.1007/978-3-662-07358-2 Google Scholar
- 39Du XP, Sudjianto A, Huang BQ. Reliability-based design with the mixture of random and interval variables. Journal of Mechanical Design 2005; 127: 1068–76.
- 40Gao W, Song C, Tin-Loi F. Probabilistic interval analysis for structures with uncertainty. Structural Safety 2010; 32: 191–9.
- 41Jiang C, Li WX, Han X, Liu LX, Le PH. Structural reliability analysis based on random distributions with interval parameters. Computers & Structures 2011; 89: 2292–302.
- 42Muscolino G, Sofi A. Stochastic analysis of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters via improved interval analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2012; 28: 152–63.
- 43Jiang C, Long XY, Han X, Tao YR, Liu J. Probability-interval hybrid reliability analysis for cracked structures existing epistemic uncertainty. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2013; 112: 148–64.
- 44Beer M, Zhang Y, Quek ST, Phoon KK. Reliability analysis with scarce information: comparing alternative approaches in a geotechnical engineering context. Structural Safety 2013; 41: 1–10.
- 45Do DM, Gao W, Song C, Tangaramvong S. Dynamic analysis and reliability assessment of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters under stochastic process excitations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2014; 132: 46–59.
- 46Wu JL, Luo Z, Zhang N, Zhang YQ. A new uncertain analysis method and its application in vehicle dynamics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2015; 50-51: 659–75.
- 47Möller B, Beer M. Engineering computation under uncertainty – capabilities of non-traditional models. Computers & Structures 2008; 86: 1024–41.
- 48Moller B, Graf W, Beer M. Fuzzy structural analysis using alpha-level optimization. Computational Mechanics 2000; 26: 547–65.
- 49Beer M, Ferson S. Fuzzy probability in engineering analyses. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM 2011) and the Fifth International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis (ISUMA 2011). Reston, VA: USA, 2011; 53–61.
- 50Muhanna RL, Zhang H, Mullen RL. Interval finite elements as a basis for generalized models of uncertainty in engineering mechanics. Reliable Computing 2007; 13: 173–94.
- 51Degrauwe D, Lombaert G, De Roeck G. Improving interval analysis in finite element calculations by means of affine arithmetic. Computers & Structures 2010; 88: 247–54.
- 52Wu JL, Luo Z, Zhang YQ, Zhang N, Chen LP. Interval uncertain method for multibody mechanical systems using Chebyshev inclusion functions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2013; 95: 608–630.
- 53Buras AJ, Jamin M, Lautenbacher ME. A 1996 analysis of the CP violating ratio epsilon'/epsilon. Physics Letters B 1996; 389: 749–756.
- 54Rao SS, Berke L. Analysis of uncertain structural systems using interval analysis. AIAA Journal 1997; 35: 727–735.
- 55Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4: Perth, Western Australia, 1995; 1942–1948.
- 56Xiaohui H, Eberhart RC, Yuhui S. Engineering optimization with particle swarm. In Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2003 SIS '03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE: Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 2003; 53–57.
- 57Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T, Grierson D. Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2005; 19: 43–53.
- 58Kreinovich V, Nguyen HT, Wu BL. On-line algorithms for computing mean and variance of interval data, and their use in intelligent systems. Information Sciences 2007; 177: 3228–38.
- 59Ferson S, Ginzburg L, Kreinovich V, Longpr L, Aviles M. Computing Variance for interval data is NP-hard. SIGACT News 2002; 33: 108–18.
10.1145/564585.564604 Google Scholar
- 60Oberkampf WL, Helton JC, Joslyn CA, Wojtkiewicz SF, Ferson S. Challenge problems: uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2004; 85: 11–9.
- 61Elishakoff I. Notes on philosophy of the Monte Carlo method. International Applied Mechanics 2003; 39: 753–762.
- 62Oberkampf WL, DeLand SM, Rutherford BM, Diegert KV, Alvin KF. Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2002; 75: 333–357.
- 63Venter G, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Multidisciplinary optimization of a transport aircraft wing using particle swarm optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2004; 26: 121–131.
- 64Perez RE, Behdinan K. Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization. Computers & Structures 2007; 85: 1579–1588.
- 65Plevris V, Papadrakakis M. A hybrid particle Swarm–Gradient algorithm for global structural optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2011; 26: 48–68.
- 66Yildiz AR. A new hybrid particle swarm optimization approach for structural design optimization in the automotive industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D-Journal of Automobile Engineering 2012; 226: 1340–1351.
- 67Parsopoulos KE, Vrahatis MN. Particle swarm Optimizer in noisy and continuously changing environments. In Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, MH Hamza (ed.). IASTED/ACTA Press; 289–294, 2001.
- 68Pant M, Thangaraj R, Grosan C, Abraham A. Improved particle swarm optimization with low-discrepancy sequences. In IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence: Hong Kong, 2008; 3011–3018.
- 69Liu NG, Gao W, Song CM, Zhang N, Pi YL. Interval dynamic response analysis of vehicle–bridge interaction system with uncertainty. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2013; 332: 3218–31.
- 70Spanos PD, Ghanem R. Stochastic finite-element expansion for random-media. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-Asce 1989; 115: 1035–53.