The cohesive element approach to dynamic fragmentation: the question of energy convergence
Corresponding Author
J. F. Molinari
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 104 Latrobe Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 104 Latrobe Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorG. Gazonas
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, Attn: AMSRD-ARL-WM-MD; Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorR. Raghupathy
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 104 Latrobe Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorF. Zhou
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 104 Latrobe Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
J. F. Molinari
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 104 Latrobe Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 104 Latrobe Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorG. Gazonas
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, Attn: AMSRD-ARL-WM-MD; Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066 U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorR. Raghupathy
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 104 Latrobe Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorF. Zhou
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 104 Latrobe Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The cohesive element approach is getting increasingly popular for simulations in which a large amount of cracking occurs. Naturally, a robust representation of fragmentation mechanics is contingent to an accurate description of dissipative mechanisms in form of cracking and branching. A number of cohesive law models have been proposed over the years and these can be divided into two categories: cohesive laws that are initially rigid and cohesive laws that have an initial elastic slope. This paper focuses on the initially rigid cohesive law, which is shown to successfully capture crack branching mechanisms in simulations. The paper addresses the issue of energy convergence of the finite-element solution for high-loading rate fragmentation problems, within the context of small strain linear elasticity. These results are obtained in an idealized one-dimensional setting, and they provide new insight for determining proper cohesive zone spacing as function of loading rate. The findings provide a useful roadmap for choosing mesh sizes and mesh size distributions in two and three-dimensional fragmentation problems. Remarkably, introducing a slight degree of mesh randomness is shown to improve by up to two orders of magnitude the convergence of the fragmentation problem. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- 1 Piekutowski AJ. Fragmentation of a sphere initiated by hypervelocity impact with a thin sheet. International Journal of Impact Engineering 1995; 17: 627–638.
- 2 De Chant L. Validation of a computational implementation of the Grady–Kipp dynamic fragmentation theory for thin metal plate impacts using an analytical strain-rate model and hydrodynamic analogues. Mechanics of Materials 2005; 37: 83–94.
- 3 Grady DE, Kipp ME. Continuum modelling of explosive fracture in oil shale. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 1980; 17: 147–157.
- 4 Brown WK, Karp RR, Grady DE. Fragmentation of the Universe. Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science 1983; 94(2): 401–412.
- 5 Espinosa HD, Brar NS, Yuan G, Xu Y, Arrieta V. Enhanced ballistic performance of confined multi-layered ceramic targets against long rod penetrators through interface defeat. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2000; 37(36): 4893–4913.
- 6 Normandia MJ. Impact response and analysis of several silicon carbides. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology 2004; 1(3): 226–234.
- 7 Dugdale DS. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1960; 8: 100–104.
- 8 Barrenblatt GI. The mathematical theory of equilibrium of cracks in brittle fracture. Advances in Applied Mechanics 1962; 7: 55–129.
10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 Google Scholar
- 9 Xu XP, Needleman A. Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1994; 42: 1397–1434.
- 10 Xu XP, Needleman A. Numerical simulations of dynamic interfacial crack growth allowing for crack growth away from the bond line. International Journal of Fracture 1995; 74: 253–275.
- 11 Xu XP, Needleman A. Numerical simulations of dynamic crack growth along an interface. International Journal of Fracture 1996; 74: 289–324.
10.1007/BF00035845 Google Scholar
- 12 Camacho GT, Ortiz M. Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1996; 33: 2899–2938.
- 13 Camacho GT, Ortiz M. Adaptive Lagrangian modelling of ballistic penetration of metallic targets. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering 1997; 142: 269–301.
- 14 Pandolfi A, Krysl P, Ortiz M. Finite element simulation of ring expansion and fragmentation: the capturing of length and time scales through cohesive models of fracture. International Journal of Fracture 1999; 95: 279–297.
- 15 Pandolfi A, Guduru PR, Ortiz M, Rosakis AJ. Three dimensional cohesive-elements of dynamic fracture in C300 steel. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2000; 37: 3733–3760.
- 16 Ruiz G, Ortiz M, Pandolfi A. Three dimensional finite-element simulation of the dynamic Brazilian tests on concrete cylinders. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 48: 963–994.
- 17 Ruiz G, Ortiz M, Pandolfi A. Three dimensional cohesive modeling of dynamic mixed-mode fracture. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 52: 97–120.
- 18 Zhai J, Zhou M. Finite element analysis of micromechanical failure modes in a heterogeneous ceramic material system. International Journal of Fracture 2000; 101: 161–180.
- 19 Zavattieri PD, Espinosa HD. Grain level analysis of crack initiation and propagation in brittle materials. Acta Materialia 2001; 49: 4291–4311.
- 20 Zhou F, Molinari JF. Stochastic fracture of ceramics under dynamic tensile loading. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2004; 41(22–23): 6573–6596.
- 21 Zhou F, Molinari JF. Dynamic crack propagation with cohesive elements: a methodology to address mesh dependency. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 59(1): 1–24.
- 22 Maiti S, Rangaswamy K, Geubelle PH. Mesoscale analysis of dynamic fragmentation of ceramics under tension. Acta Materialia 2005; 53(3): 823–834.
- 23 Zhou F, Molinari JF, Ramesh KT. Effects of material properties on the fragmentation of brittle materials. International Journal of Fracture 2005, in press.
- 24 Falk ML, Needleman A, Rice JR. A critical evaluation of cohesive zone models of dynamic fracture. Journal de Physique IV, Proceedings 2001; 5.43–5.50.
- 25 Rice JR. Some studies of crack dynamics. In Physical Aspects of Fracture Proceedings of NATO Advanced Study Institute on Physical Aspects of Fracture, 5–17, Cargese, Corsica, June 2000.
- 26 Papoulia KD, Vavasis S, Ganguly P. Spatial convergence of crack nucleation using a cohesive finite element model on a pinwheel-based mesh. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2006, in press.
- 27 Hughes TLJ. The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
- 28 Pandolfi A, Ortiz M. An efficient adaptive procedure for three-dimensional fragmentation simulations. Engineering with Computers 2002; 18: 148–159.
- 29 Papoulia KD, Sam CH, Vavasis SA. Time continuity in cohesive finite element modeling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 58(5): 679–701.
- 30 Rice JR. Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture. In Fracture, An Advanced Treatise, Vol. II: Mathematical Fundamentals, H Liebowitz (ed.). Academic Press: New York, 1968; 191–311.
- 31 Schapery RA. A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media. International Journal of Fracture 1975; 11(1): 141–159.
- 32 Rice JR. The mechanics of earthquake rupture. In Physics of the Earth's Interior (Proceedings of International School of Physics ‘Enrico Fermi’), AM Dziewonski, E Boschi (eds). North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1980; 555–649.
- 33 Williams ML. On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1957; 24: 109–114.
- 34 Palmer AC, Rice JR. The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of over-consolidated clay. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1973; 332: 527–548.
- 35 Yu C, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M, Coker D, Rosakis AJ. Three-dimensional modeling of intersonic shear-crack growth in asymmetrically loaded unidirectional composite plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2002; 39(25): 6135–6157.
- 36 Drugan WJ. Dynamic fragmentation of brittle materials: analytical mechanics-based models. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2001; 49: 1181–1208.
- 37 Zhou F, Molinari JF, Shioya T. A rate-dependent cohesive model for simulating dynamic crack propagation in brittle materials. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2005; 72: 1383–1410.
- 38 Areias PMA, Belytschko T. Analysis of three-dimensional crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 63(5): 760–788.
- 39 Shioya T, Zhou F. Dynamic fracture toughness and crack propagation in brittle material. Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Constitutive Relation in High/Very High Strain Rates, Noda, Japan, 1995; 105–112.
- 40 Zhou F, Molinari JF, Ramesh KT. A cohesive model based fragmentation analysis: effects of strain rate and initial defect distribution. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2005; 42(18–19): 5181–5207.
- 41 Zhou F, Molinari JF, Ramesh KT. A finite difference analysis of the brittle fragmentation of an expanding ring. Computational Materials Science 2005, in press.
- 42 Zhou F, Molinari JF, Ramesh KT. Characteristic fragment size distribution of dynamically expanding rings. Applied Physics Letters 2005, submitted.
- 43 Englman R, Rivier N, Jaeger Z. Size-distribution in sudden breakage by the use of entropy maximization. Journal of Applied Physics 1988; 63(9): 4766–4768.
- 44 Raz T, Even U, Levine RD. Fragment size distribution in cluster impact: shattering versus evaporation by a statistical approach. Journal of Chemical Physics 1995; 103(13): 5394–5409.
- 45 Smalley LL, Woosley JK. Application of steady state maximum entropy methods to high energy impacts on ceramic targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering 1999; 23: 869–882.
- 46 Grady DE. Local inertial effects in dynamic fragmentation. Journal of Applied Physics 1982; 53(1): 322–325.
- 47 Bazant ZP, Li Y-N. Cohesive crack with rate-dependent opening and viscoelasticity: 1. Mathematical model and scaling. International Journal of Fracture 1997; 86: 247–265.
- 48 Li Y-N, Bazant ZP. Cohesive crack with rate-dependent opening and viscoelasticity: 2. Numerical algorithm, behavior and size effect. International Journal of Fracture 1997; 86: 267–288.
- 49 Moes N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 46(1): 131–150.
- 50 Belytschko T, Chen H, Xu JX, Zi G. Dynamic crack propagation based on loss of hyperbolicity and a new discontinuous enrichment. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 58(12): 1873–1905.
- 51 Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 61(13): 2316–2343.