Volume 37, Issue 16 pp. 2703-2716
Article
Full Access

Wavelet–Galerkin solutions for one-dimensional partial differential equations

Kevin Amaratunga

Kevin Amaratunga

Intelligent Engineering Systems Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.

Graduate Student

Search for more papers by this author
John R. Williams

John R. Williams

Intelligent Engineering Systems Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.

Associate Professor

Search for more papers by this author
Sam Qian

Sam Qian

Aware, Inc. One Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02142, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
John Weiss

John Weiss

Aware, Inc. One Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02142, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 August 1994
Citations: 149

Abstract

In this paper we describe how wavelets may be used to solve partial differential equations. These problems are currently solved by techniques such as finite differences, finite elements and multi-grid. The wavelet method, however, offers several advantages over traditional methods. Wavelets have the ability to represent functions at different levels of resolution, thereby providing a logical means of developing a hierarchy of solutions. Furthermore, compactly supported wavelets (such as those due to Daubechies1) are localized in space, which means that the solution can be refined in regions of high gradient, e.g. stress concentrations, without having to regenerate the mesh for the entire problem.

In order to demonstrate the wavelet technique, we consider the one-dimensional counterpart of Helmholtz's equation. By comparison with a simple finite difference solution to this problem with periodic boundary conditions, we show how a wavelet technique may be efficiently developed. Dirichlet boundary conditions are then imposed, using the capacitance matrix method described by Proskurowski and Widlund2 and others. The convergence rates of the wavelet solutions are examined and they are found to compare extremely favourably to the finite difference solutions. Preliminary investigations also indicate that the wavelet technique is a strong contender to the finite element method, at least for problems with simple geometries.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.