Volume 44, Issue 2 pp. 374-381
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Differences in Micturition-Related Brain Activity Between Volitional and Involuntary Detrusor Contractions

Nhi T. Ha

Nhi T. Ha

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Aidin Abedi

Aidin Abedi

Department of Neurological Surgery, USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Luis Alejandro Morales Ojeda

Luis Alejandro Morales Ojeda

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Rancho Research Institute, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, California, USA

Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stefania Montero

Stefania Montero

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Rancho Research Institute, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, California, USA

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Priya Kohli

Priya Kohli

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David Chapman

David Chapman

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Armita Abedi

Armita Abedi

School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Search for more papers by this author
Petr Gaburak

Petr Gaburak

Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David Ginsberg

David Ginsberg

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard L. Harvey

Richard L. Harvey

Rancho Research Institute, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Charles Y. Liu

Charles Y. Liu

Department of Neurological Surgery, USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kay Jann

Kay Jann

USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Evgeniy Kreydin

Corresponding Author

Evgeniy Kreydin

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Department of Neurological Surgery, USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Rancho Research Institute, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, California, USA

Correspondence: Evgeniy Kreydin ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 December 2024

Kay Jann and Evgeniy Kreydin contributed equally to this manuscript.

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Detrusor contractions can be classified as either volitional or involuntary. The latter are a hallmark of urge urinary incontinence. Understanding differences in neuroactivation associated with both types of contractions can help elucidate pathophysiology and therapeutic targets. In this study we aim to compare brain activity associated with voluntary and involuntary detrusor contractions.

Methods

Twenty seven stroke survivors with secondary storage lower urinary tract symptoms underwent four filling cycles of simultaneous urodynamics and BOLD-signal fMRI. After each fill, participants were instructed to void. Voids inside the designated 10-s period were considered voluntary contractions. All others were considered involuntary. Each contraction was then segmented into phases: Early (10 s before start of contraction), Rise (start of contraction to peak vesical pressure), Plateau, and Fall (from peak pressure to resolution of the contraction). BOLD-effect was compared between the two contraction types, employing a minimum cluster size of 25 voxels and significance threshold at p < 0.005.

Results

Compared to volitional contractions, involuntary contractions were associated with diminished brain activity in each contraction phase. During the Early phase, this difference was most prominent in areas implicated with sensory and autonomic function, shifting to regions tasked with motor control as the contraction continued and eventually attenuating as the contraction resolved.

Conclusion

This study uniquely contrasts brain activation associated with volitional and involuntary contractions. Relative to involuntary contractions, volitional contractions revealed increased activity in motor, sensory, and executive functioning regions. These findings reflect both the physiological mechanism of volitional contractions and suggest the displacement of this mechanism by a subcortical reflex in involuntary contractions.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT05301335.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Kreydin reports he is a cofounder and stockholder from SpineX Inc., outside the submitted work. No financial contribution was received from SpineX Inc for conceptualization or execution of this study. All other authors have no Conflict of Interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.