Volume 38, Issue 2 pp. 478-498
TERMINOLOGY, CONSENSUS ARTICLE, BEST PRACTICE POLICIES

International Continence Society consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of nocturia

Karel Everaert

Corresponding Author

Karel Everaert

Urology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Correspondence Karel Everaert, Department of Urology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Francois Hervé

Francois Hervé

Urology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Ruud Bosch

Ruud Bosch

Urology Department, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Roger Dmochowski

Roger Dmochowski

Urology Department, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Search for more papers by this author
Marcus Drake

Marcus Drake

Bristol Urological Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Hashim Hashim

Hashim Hashim

Bristol Urological Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Chapple

Christopher Chapple

Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Philip Van Kerrebroeck

Philip Van Kerrebroeck

Urology Department, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Sherif Mourad

Sherif Mourad

Urology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Abrams

Paul Abrams

Bristol Urological Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Alan Wein

Alan Wein

Urology Department, University of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 February 2019
Citations: 112

Karel Everaert and Francois Hervé contributed equally to this study.

Editorial assistance was provided by Caroline Loat, PhD.

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with nocturia have to face many hurdles before being diagnosed and treated properly. The aim of this paper is to: summarize the nocturia patient pathway, explore how nocturia is diagnosed and treated in the real world and use the Delphi method to develop a practical algorithm with a focus on what steps need to be taken before prescribing desmopressin.

Methods

Evidence comes from existing guidelines (Google, PubMed), International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society (ICI-RS) 2017, prescribing information and a Delphi panel (3 rounds). The International Continence Society initiated this study, the authors represent the ICI-RS, European Association of Urology, and Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU).

Results

Diagnostic packages: consensus on, history taking for all causalities, intake diary (fluid, food) and bladder diary, not for its duration. Pelvic (women) or rectal (men) examination, prostate-specific antigen, serum sodium check (SSC), renal function, endocrine screening: when judged necessary. Timing or empty stomach when SSC is not important. Therapeutic packages: the safe candidates for desmopressin can be phenotyped as no polydipsia, heart/kidney failure, severe leg edema or obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Lifestyle interventions may be useful. Initiating desmopressin: risk management consensus on three clinical pictures.

Follow-up of desmopressin therapy: there was consensus on SSC day 3 to 7, and at 1 month. Stop therapy if SSC is <130 mmol/L regardless of symptoms. Stop if SSC is 130 to 135 mmol/L with symptoms of hyponatremia.

Conclusion

A summary of the nocturia patient pathway across different medical specialists is useful in the visualization and phenotyping of patients for diagnosis and therapy. By summarizing basic knowledge of desmopressin, we aim to ease its initiation and shorten the patient journey for nocturia.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.