Volume 38, Issue 3 pp. 1009-1023
SOUNDING BOARD

The clinical role of LASER for vulvar and vaginal treatments in gynecology and female urology: An ICS/ISSVD best practice consensus document

Mario Preti MD

Mario Preti MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Pedro Vieira-Baptista MD

Pedro Vieira-Baptista MD

Hospital Lusíadas Porto, Porto, Portugal

Lower Genital Tract Unit, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu PhD

Corresponding Author

Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu PhD

Department of Urogynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare, London, UK

Correspondence

Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu, Imperial College Healthcare, Department of Urogynaecology, London, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Carol Emi Bretschneider MD

Carol Emi Bretschneider MD

Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Margot Damaser PhD

Margot Damaser PhD

Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute and Department of Biomedical Engineering Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Oktay Demirkesen MD

Oktay Demirkesen MD

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Debra S. Heller MD

Debra S. Heller MD

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey

Search for more papers by this author
Naside Mangir MD

Naside Mangir MD

Kroto Research Institute, Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Claudia Marchitelli MD

Claudia Marchitelli MD

Department of Gynecology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Search for more papers by this author
Sherif Mourad MD

Sherif Mourad MD

Department of Urology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Search for more papers by this author
Micheline Moyal-Barracco MD

Micheline Moyal-Barracco MD

Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Tarnier-Cochin, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Sol Peremateu MD

Sol Peremateu MD

Department of Gynecology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Search for more papers by this author
Visha Tailor MD

Visha Tailor MD

Department of Urogynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tufan Tarcan MD

Tufan Tarcan MD

Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Elise J.B. De MD

Elise J.B. De MD

Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School Boston, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Colleen K. Stockdale MD, MS

Colleen K. Stockdale MD, MS

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 February 2019
Citations: 60
Roger Dmochowski led the peer-review process as the Associate Editor responsible for the paper.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical role of LASER for vulvar and vaginal treatments in gynecology and female urology is controversial.

AIMS

In this best practice document, we propose recommendations for the use of LASER for gynecologic and urologic conditions such as vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence, vulvodynia, and lichen sclerosus based on a thorough literature review.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This project was developed between January and September 2018. The development of this document followed the ICS White Paper Standard Operating Procedures.

RESULTS

Most of the available studies are limited by their design; for example they lack a control group, patients are not randomized, follow up is short term, series are small, LASER is not compared with standard treatments, and studies are industry sponsored. Due to these limitations, the level of evidence for the use of LASER in the treatment of these conditions remains low and does not allow for definitive recommendations for its use in routine clinical practice. Histological evidence is commonly reported as proof of tissue regeneration following LASER treatment. However, the histological changes noted can also be consistent with reparative changes after a thermal injury rather than necessarily representing regeneration or restoration of function. The use of LASER in women with vulvodynia or lichen sclerosus should not be recommended in routine clinical practice. There is no biological plausibility or safety data on its use on this population of women.

DISCUSSION

The available clinical studies do not present convincing data regarding the efficacy of LASER for the treatment of vaginal atrophy or urinary incontinence. Also, while short-term complications seem to be uncommon, data concerning long-term outcomes are lacking.

CONCLUSION

At this point, LASER is not recommended for routine treatment of the aforementioned conditions unless part of well-designed clinical trials or with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflicts of interest to declare.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.